In recent years much has been written about old age dependency and the need for greater emphasis on individual and familial responsibility for supporting elderly persons as opposed to state responsibility. We argue that old age dependency is not a new problem and that there was communal responsibility—as opposed to strictly privitized responsibility—for elderly persons in the past.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MinklerM., Blaming the Aged Victim: The Politics of Scapegoating in Times of Fiscal Conservatism, International Journal of Health Services, 13:1, pp. 158–159, 1983.
2.
ThomsonD., “I am not my father's keeper”: Families and the Elderly in Nineteenth Century England, Law and History Review, 3, pp. 265, 285–286, 1984.
3.
ThomsonD., The Decline of Social Welfare: Falling Support for the Elderly Since Early Victorian Times, Ageing and Society, 4:4, pp. 453–455, 1984.
4.
SchultzJ. H., The Economics of Aging, 3rd Edition, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp. 36–39, 1985.
5.
MylesJ., The Trillion Dollar Misunderstanding: Social Security's Real Crisis, Working Papers, 8, pp. 22–31, 1981.
6.
SmithR. M., The Structural Dependence of the Elderly as a Recent Development: Some Skeptical Historical Thoughts, Ageing and Society, 4:4, pp. 414–415, 1984.
7.
OxleyG. W., Poor Relief in England and Wales 1601–1834, David and Charles, Newton-Abbott, England p. 57, 1974.
8.
JordonW. K., Philanthropy in England 1480–1660: A Study of the Changing Pattern of English Social Aspirations, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY p. 42, 1959.
9.
SlackP., Poverty and Politics in Salisbury: 1597–1666, in Crisis and Order in English Towns 1550–1700, ClarkP. and SlackP. (eds.), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 166, 176, 1972.
10.
TierneyB., Medieval Poor Law: A Sketch of Canonical Theory and Its Application in England, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA p. 6, 1959.
11.
WallR., The Household: Demographic and Economic Change in England 1650–1970, in Family Forms in Historic Europe, WallR.RobinJ., and LaslettP. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 508–509, 1983.
12.
LaslettP., Family and Household as Work and Kin Groups, in Family Forms in Historic Europe, WallR.RobinJ., and LaslettP. (eds.), pp. 552, 559, 1983.
13.
LaslettP., Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 61, 94, 179, 199, 201, 1977.
14.
HajnalJ., Two Kinds of Pre-industrial Household Formation Systems, in Family Forms in Historic Europe, WallR.RobinJ., and LaslettP. (eds.) p. 69, 1983.
15.
LaslettP., The Significance of the Past in the Study of Ageing, Ageing and Society, 4:4, pp. 379–389, 1984.
16.
RobinJ., Family Care of the Elderly in a Nineteenth Century Devonshire Parish, Ageing and Society, 4:4, pp. 505–516, 1984.
17.
WallR., Residential Isolation of the Elderly: A Comparison Over Time, Ageing and Society, 4:4, pp. 483–503, 1984.
18.
QuadagnoJ., Aging in Industrial Society, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1972.
19.
SmithJ. E., Widowhood and Ageing in Traditional English Society, Ageing and Society, 4:4, pp. 437–438, 1984.
20.
StearnsP. N., Introduction, in Old Age in Preindustrial Society, StearnsP. N. (ed.), Holmes and Meier, New York, NY, pp. 1–18, 1982.
21.
AchenbaumW. A. and StearnsP. N., Modernization and the History of Old Age, Gerontologist, 18, pp. 306–313, 1978.
22.
LaslettP., Societal Development and Aging, in Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, BinstockR. and ShanasE. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY p. 100, 1976.
23.
FeldsteinM. S., Facing the Crisis of Social Security, The Public Interest, pp. 88–100, 1977.
24.
WilliamsonJ. B.ShindulJ. A., and EvansL., Aging and Public Policy: Social Control or Social Justice?, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL p. 115, 1985.
