The author would like to express thanks for critical comments received from Betty Szudy, LOHP, University of California, and an anonymous reviewer.
2.
DeutschS.“Editor's Introduction: Theme Issue on Occupational Safety and Health,”Labor Studies Journal6, 1981,3–6.
3.
GochfeldM.CampbellV.LandsbergisP.“Demography of the Hazardous Waste Industry,” In GochfeldM. (ed) Occupational Medicine: State of the Arts Reviews — Hazardous Waste Industry. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 1990,9–23.
4.
HughesJ.“An Assessment of Training Needs for Worker Safety and Health Programs: Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response,”Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene6 (1991), 114–118.
5.
Gochfeld, ibid.
6.
RuttenbergR.“Needs Assessment for Hazmat Training Program.”NIEHS,1994.
7.
SlatinC.“Health and Safety Training: Listening to Workers' Voices,”New Solutions5 (1995), 4–5.
8.
MerrillM.“Trust in Training: The Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union Worker-to-Worker Training Program,” in ColliganM. (ed) Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Reviews — Occupational Safety and Health Training. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus,1994,341–354.
9.
WallersteinN.WeingerM.“Health and Safety Education For Worker Empowerment,”American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 22 (1992), 619–635.
10.
GustavsenB.HunniusG. (1981): New Patterns of Work Reform: The Case of Norway. Oslo: Oslo University Press, 1981.
11.
DeutschS.“Workplace Democracy and Worker Health: Strategies For Intervention,” In JohnsonJ. and JohanssonG. (eds): The Psychosocial Work Environment: Work Organization, Democratization and Health. Amityville, N.Y.: Baywood Pub. Co., 1991, 281–292.
12.
WeilD.The Impact of Safety and Health Committee Mandates on OSHA Enforcement: Lessons From Oregon. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute, 1994.
13.
U. S. Government Accounting Office, Occupational Safety and Health: Differences Between Programs in the United States and Canada. Washington, D.C.: GAO, 1993.
14.
WallersteinN.BakerR.“Labor Education Programs In Health and Safety.” In ColliganM. (ed): Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Reviews: Occupational Safety and Health Training. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 1994, 619–635.
15.
DeutschS.“Worker Learning in the Context of Changing Technology and Work Environment.” In LeymannH. and KornbluhH. (eds): Socialization and Learning at Work. Aldershot: Gower Publishing, 1989,237–255.
16.
BrownM. P. and NguyenScottN.“Evaluating a Training-for-Action Job Health and Safety Program,”American Journal of Industrial Medicine22 (1992) 739–750.
LuskinJ.SomersCWoodingJ.LevensteinC.“Teaching Health and Safety: Problems and Possibilities for Learner-Centered Training,”American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 22 (1991) 665–676.
19.
KaminskiM.GraubarthR.MockA.“Strengthening the Role of Local Health and Safety Activists,”New Solutions5 (1995)6–14.
20.
DeutschS., National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Hazardous Waste Worker Training Grant Programs and Inter-Agency Cooperative Agreement with U.S. Department of Energy, Site Visit Evaluation Report. NIEHS, 1994.
21.
DeutschS. and ViaE.“A University Labor Education Program to Train Labor Movement Occupational Safety and Health Trainers,” In Proceedings of the Symposium for Labor Educators on Occupational Health and Safety. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin School for Workers, 1979,199–206.
22.
Merrill, ibid.
23.
McQuiston, ibid.
24.
U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, “Complex Clean-up: The Environmental Legacy of Nuclear Weapons Production.”Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991.