The majority of U.S. sewage sludges are disposed by application to land for use as a soil amendment. Class B sludges, containing a complex mix of chemical and biological contaminants, comprise the majority. Residents near land application sites report illness. Symptoms of more than 328 people involved in 39 incidents in 15 states are described. Investigation and tracking of the incidents by agencies is poor. Only one of 10 EPA regions provided substantial information on the incidents in their region. Investigations, when conducted, focused on compliance with regulations. No substantial health-related investigations were conducted by federal, state, or local officials. A system for tracking and investigation is needed. Analysis of the limited data suggests that surface-applied Class B sludges present the greatest risk and should be eliminated. However, even under less risky application scenarios, the potential for off-site movement of chemicals, pathogens, and biological agents suggests that their use should be eliminated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JonesG.RobertsonA.ForbesJ., and HollierG., Harper-Collins Dictionary of Environmental Science, Harper Publisher, p. 372, 1992.
2.
EddyN., Septic Tanks in the U.S.: How Many Are There, Where Are They, and Are They Working Properly?Small Flows, 13: 2, 1999.
EPA Biosolids Generation and Uses, EPA 530R-99-009, September 1999.
5.
EPA Biosolids Generation and Uses, EPA 530R-99-009, September 1999.
6.
Biosolids n (1997): solid organic matter recovered from sewage treatment process and used, esp. as fertilizer—usually in pl. Webster's Dictionary.
7.
HarrisonE. Z. and EatonM. M., The Role of Municipalities in Regulating the Land Application of Sewage Sludges and Septage, Natural Resources Journal, 41: 1, 2001.
8.
HarrisonE. Z.McBrideM. B., and BouldinD. R., Land Application of Sewage Sludges: An Appraisal of the US Regulations, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 11: 1, 1999.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
13.
LewisD. L.GattieD. K.NovakM. E.SanchezS., and PumphreyC., Interactions of Pathogens and Irritant Chemicals in Land-Applied Sewage Sludges (Biosolids), BMC Public Health, 2: 11, 2002.
14.
DowdS. E.GerbaC. P.PepperI. L., and PillaiS. D., Bioaerosol Transport Modeling and Risk Assessment in Relation to Biosolid Placement, Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, pp. 343–348, 2000.
15.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.; LewisD. L.GattieD. K.NovakM. E.SanchezS., and PumphreyC., Interactions of Pathogens and Irritant Chemicals in Land-Applied Sewage Sludges (Biosolids), BMC Public Health, 2: 11, 2002.
We did not contact California because information from the EPA Regional Biosolids Coordinator was sufficient.
18.
However, EPA retains regulatory authority for sludge application for all states except those that have received federal delegation for implementing the program (Oklahoma, S. Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin).
19.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, Biosolids Management and Enforcement, Audit Report No. 2000-P-10, 2000.
20.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, Biosolids Management and Enforcement, Audit Report No. 2000-P-10, 2000.
21.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General Status Report, Land Application of Biosolids, 2002-S-000004, 2002.
22.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
23.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General Status Report, Land Application of Biosolids, 2002-S-000004, 2002.
24.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
25.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
26.
Correspondence from Mark Miller, The Canadian Infectious Disease Society, Ottawa, Canada, June 1, 2001.
27.
Correspondence from DominyMadolyn, Region 4 Biosolids Coordinator to Ellen Harrison, Cornell Waste Management Institute, 2001.
28.
Correspondence from ZimmermanRobert S.Jr., Dept of Health, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to The Honorable Camille George, 2000.
29.
GoodfriendD. P., Evaluation of Health Concerns in Waterford, Virginia and their Possible Association with Biosolid Application, May 30, 2000.
30.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
31.
LewisD. L.GattieD. K.NovakM. E.SanchezS., and PumphreyC., Interactions of Pathogens and Irritant Chemicals in Land-Applied Sewage Sludges (Biosolids), BMC Public Health, 2: 11, 2002.
32.
DudleyD. J.GuentzelM. N.IbarraM. J.MooreB. E., and SagikB. P., Enumeration of Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria from Sewage Sludges, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 38, pp. 118–126, 1980.
33.
Report on Complaint 0005, Michael Rainey, Dept. of Environmental Services, N.H., May 30, 2000.
34.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, Biosolids Management and Enforcement, Audit Report No. 2000-P-10, 2000.
35.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, Biosolids Management and Enforcement, Audit Report No. 2000-P-10, 2000.
36.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, Status Report, Land Application of Biosolids, 2002-S-000004, 2002.
37.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Standards for the Use of Disposal of Sewage Sludge, Federal Register, 58: 32, 1993.
38.
StraubT. M.PepperI. L., and GerbaC. P., Hazards from Pathogenic Microorganisms in Land-Disposed Sewage Sludge, Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 132, NRC2002.
39.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002; PillaiS. D.WidmerK. W.DowdS. E., and RickeS. C., Occurrence of Airborne Bacteria and Pathogen Indicator during Land Application of Sewage Sludge, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62: 1, pp. 296–299, 1995.
40.
DudleyD. J.GuentzelM. N.IbarraM. J.MooreB. E., and SagikB. P., Enumeration of Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria from Sewage Sludges, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 38, pp. 118–126, 1980.
41.
OttolengthiA. C. and HamparianV. V., Multiyear Study of Sludge Application to Farmland: Prevalence of Bacterial Enteric Pathogens and Antibody Status of Farm Families, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53: 1, pp. 1118–1124, 1987.
42.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
43.
Two (2) million CFU/g(dry wt) of fecal coliform used as an indicator of treatment effectiveness, are allowed in Class B sludges that can be land-applied.
44.
Centers for Disease Control, Guidance for Controlling Potential Risks to Workers Exposed to Class B Biosolids, DHHS (NIOSH) publication number 2002–149, 2002.
45.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
46.
SchiffmanS. S.WalkerJ. M.DaltonP.LorigT. S.RaymerJ. H.ShustermanD., and WilliamsC. M., Potential Health Effects of Odor from Animal Operations, Wastewater Treatment, and Recycling of Byproducts, Journal of Agromedicine, 7: 1, 2000.
47.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002; LewisD. L.GattieD. K.NovakM. E.SanchezS., and PumphreyC., Interactions of Pathogens and Irritant Chemicals in Land-Applied Sewage Sludges (Biosolids), BMC Public Health, 2: 11, 2002.
48.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
49.
National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.
50.
DornC. R.ReddyC. S.LamphereD. N.GaeumanJ. V., and LaneseR., Municipal Sewage Sludge Application on Ohio Farms: Health Effects, Environmental Research, 38, pp 332–359, 1985.
