For instance, CovelloV.T. (1989) “Communicating right-to-know information on chemical risks.”Environ. Sci. Technol.23: 1444–1449.
2.
Committee on Risk Assessment Methods, National Academy of Sciences, documents on exposure assessment, maximally tolerated dose in bioassays, and two-stage models of chemical carcinogenesis, 1991–1992. Also, personal communication with Bernard Goldstein, MD, chair of CRAM, July 1992.
3.
ZeckhauserR., and ViscusiK. (1991) “Risk within reason.”Science248: 559–564.
4.
SagoffM. (1988) The Economy of the Earth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; MayoD. and HollanderR. (1991) Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Office of Management and Budget (1991) The Regulatory Program of the United States Government, Washington: the White House.
6.
Office of Technology Assessment (1987). Identifying and Regulating Chemical Carcinogens in the Federal Government, Washington: GPO.
7.
National Academy of Sciences (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington: NAS Press.
8.
See SilbergeldE.K. (1991) “Risk assessment and risk management: The uneasy divorce.” In: MayoD., and Hollander, op.cit., pp 99–114.