Several complications may be encountered by the investigator who wishes simply to “plug a future time perspective measure or two” into highly quantitative analyses. Difficulties in data collection appear to arise both from the complex nature of time perspective and from characteristics sometimes associated with older respondents themselves. Although an accompanying data base for empirically determining the most appropriate procedures is currently absent, it appears that an awareness of certain basic points can enhance the quality and accuracy of data collection. A number of these generic methodological considerations are discussed, and various suggestions are offered. Time perspective should not be considered a universal solution for every researchable issue in gerontology. Its strong face validity and literature to date should, however, encourage our addressing the methodological difficulties that exist.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BuhlerC., The Course of Human Life as a Psychological Problem, Human Development, 11, pp. 184–200, 1968.
2.
ButlerR. N., The Life Review: An Interpretation of Reminiscence in the Aged, Psychiatry, 26, pp. 65–76, 1963.
3.
HendricksC. D. and HendricksJ., Concepts of Time and Temporal Construction Among the Aged with Implications for Research, in Time, Roles, and Self in Old Age, GubriumJ. F. (ed.), Human Sciences Press, New York, 1976.
4.
KastenbaumR. J., On the Meaning of Time in Later Life, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 109, pp. 9–25, 1966.
5.
KastenbaumR. J., Time, Death and Ritual in Old Age, in The Study of Time II, FraserJ. T. and LawrenceN. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975.
6.
MarksonE. W., Readjustment to Time in Old Age: A Life Cycle Approach, Psychiatry, 36, pp. 37–48, 1973.
7.
NeugartenB. L., Time, Age and the Life Cycle, American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, pp. 887–893, 1979.
8.
FinkH. N., The Relationship of Time Perspective to Age, Institutionalization, and Activity, Journal of Gerontology, 12, pp. 414–417, 1957.
9.
NeugartenB. L. and GarronD. V., Attitudes of Middle Aged Persons Toward Growing Older, Geriatrics, 14, pp. 21–24, 1959.
10.
KastenbaumR., Cognitive and Personal Futurity in Later Life, Journal of Individual Psychology, 19, pp. 216–222, 1963.
11.
CostaP. and KastenbaumR., Some Aspects of Memories and Ambitions Among Centennarians, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 110, pp. 3–16, 1967.
12.
SpenceD. L., The Role of Futurity in Aging Adaptation, The Gerontologist, 8, pp. 180–183, 1968.
13.
BackK. W. and BourqueL. B., Life Graphs: Aging and Cohort Effects, Journal of Gerontology, 25, pp. 249–255, 1970.
14.
BortnerR. W. and HultschD. F., Personal Time Perspective in Adulthood, Developmental Psychology, 7, pp. 98–103, 1972.
15.
BortnerR. W. and HultschD. F., Patterns of Subjective Deprivation in Adulthood, Developmental Psychology, 10, pp. 534–545, 1974.
16.
BourqueL. B. and BackK. W., Life Graphs and Life Events, Journal of Gerontology, 32, pp. 669–674, 1977.
17.
ChiribogaD. A., A Life Course Perspective, Journal of Gerontology, 33, pp. 388–393, 1978.
18.
LevyS. M., Temporal Experience in the Aged: Body Integrity and Social Milieu, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 9, pp. 313–334, 1978–1979.
19.
HughesE., Institutionalized Older Adults and Their Future Orientation, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 27, pp. 130–134, 1980.
20.
RakowskiW., Future Time Perspectives in Later Adulthood: Review and Research Directions, Experimental Aging Research, 5, pp. 43–88, 1979.
21.
RunyanW. M., The Life Satisfaction Chart: Perceptions of the Course of Subjective Experience, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 11, pp. 45–64, 1980.
22.
GiambraL. W., Adult Male Daydreaming Across the Life Span: A Replication, Further Analyses, and Tentative Norms Based Upon Retrospective Reports, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8, pp. 197–227, 1977–1978.
23.
CottleT. J., The Circles Test: An Investigation of Perceptions of Temporal Relatedness and Dominance, Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 31, pp. 58–71, 1967.
24.
von WrightJ. M. and von WrightM. R., Sex Difference in Personal and Global Future Time Perspective, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, p. 44, 1976.
25.
EriksonE. H., Identity and the Life Cycle, Psychological Issues, 1, pp. 1–171, 1959, (monograph).
26.
HoornaertJ., Time Perspective: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations, Psychologica Belgica, 13, pp. 265–294, 1973.
27.
RakowskiW., Comparability and Reliability of Techniques to Assess Personal Future Extension, Experimental Aging Research, 8:4, pp. 199–201, 1982.
28.
von WrightJ. and KinnunenR., On the Scaling of Future Time, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, pp. 1235–1241, 1976.
29.
WallaceM., Future Time Perspective in Schizophrenia, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, pp. 240–245, 1956.
30.
EsonM. E. and GreenfieldN., Life Space: Its Content and Temporal Dimensions, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100, pp. 113–128, 1962.
31.
YakerH. M., The Schizophrenic Perception of Time—A Syntactical Analysis of Time Language, in The Future of Time: Man's Temporal Environment, YakerH.OsmondH., and CheekF. (eds.), Doubleday Company, Garden City, New York, 1972.
32.
CottleT. J. and PleckJ. H., Linear Estimation of Temporal Extension: The Effect of Age, Sex, and Social Class, Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 33, pp. 81–93, 1969.
33.
CottleT. J. and KlinebergS. J., The Present of Things Future: Explorations of Time in Human Experience, Free Press, New York, 1974.
34.
RakowskiW., Reporting and Coding Expected Life-Events as Concerns in Time Perspective Research, paper presented at the Thirty-first Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society, Dallas, Texas, November 17, 1978.
