The study of place transitions—moves between places as well as changes occurring in environments of elders who age in place—is a relatively new, diverse research area of high relevance for adult developmentalists and gerontologists. This article explores the usefulness of a tractable model of environmental stress and proposes three potential “place therapies” that may minimize the negative impacts of place transitions upon older adults. Specifically, a transactional model of environmental stress linked to behavior setting theory is proposed for understanding both positive and negative outcomes associated with different kinds of place transitions. Three distinct “place therapies” are considered as interventions that may hold promise for preventing, ameliorating, and enriching the diverse impacts of place transitions on older adults and their environmental milieu.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldwinC., & StokolsD. (1988). The effects of environmental change on individuals and groups: Some neglected issues in stress research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8, 57–75.
2.
ArmerJ. (1993). Elderly relocation to a congregate setting: Factors influencing adjustment. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 14, 157–172.
3.
BarerB. (1994). Men and women aging differently. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 38, 29–40.
4.
BarkerR. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior.Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
5.
BarkerR. (1979). The influence of frontier environments on behavior. In SteffenJ. (Ed.), The American West (pp. 61–92). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.
6.
BoschettiM. (1990). Continuity and change in century old farm homes. In SelbyR.AnthonyK.ChoiJ., & OrlandB. (Eds.), Coming of Age (pp. 139–146). Oklahoma City, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
7.
BourestomN., & PastalanL. (1981). The effects of relocation on the elderly: A reply to J. H. Borup, D. T. Gallego, & P. G. Heffernan. The Gerontologist, 21, 4–7.
8.
BrownB., & PerkinsD. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In AltmanI. & LowS. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). New York: Plenum.
9.
CampbellJ. (1986). The inner reaches of outer space: Metaphors as myth and religion.Toronto: St. James Press.
10.
CohenA. (1985). The symbolic construction of community.London: Tavistock Publications.
11.
CoppokD.FeldheimI., & KennaleyK. (1990). Developing a sense of community: A programming approach for institutionalized elderly. Activities, Adaptation, and Aging, 14, 17–25.
12.
CubaL. (1989). Retiring to vacationland: From visitor to resident. Generations, 13, 63–69.
13.
CubaL. (1995, November). At home in many places: Multiple place identities in older and younger migrants. In ScheidtR. & Norris-BakerL. (Organizers), Place transitions: Implications for the well-being of native and transitory community-based elderly. Symposium conducted at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Los Angeles, CA.
14.
CubaL., & HummonD. (1993). Constructing a sense of home: Place affiliation and migration across the life cycle. Sociological Forum, 8, 547–572.
15.
DanermarkB., & EkstromM. (1990). Relocation and health effects on the elderly: A commented research review. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 17, 25–49.
16.
DanielsT., & LappingM. (1987). Small-town triage: A rural settlement policy. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 29–40.
17.
DimondM.McCanceK., & KingK. (1987). Forced residential relocation: Its impact on the well-being of older adults. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 9, 445–464.
18.
EkstromM. (1994). Elderly people's experiences of housing renewal and forced relocation: Social theories and contextual analysis in explanations of emotional experiences. Housing Studies, 9, 369–391.
19.
FeldmanR. (1995, March). Maintaining continuity of place attachment with residential mobility. In FeldmanR. & FriedM. (Organizers), Functions and dysfunctions of place attachment. Symposium conducted at the 26th annual meeting of the Environmental Design Research Association, Boston, MA.
20.
FitchenJ. (1991). Endangered spaces, enduring places: Change, identity, and survival in rural American.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21.
GolantS. (1991). Congregate housing for the elderly: Theoretical, policy, and programmatic perspectives. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 9, 21–38.
22.
GolantS. (1998). Changing an older person's shelter and care setting: A model to explain personal and environmental outcomes. In ScheidtR. & WindleyP. (Eds.), Aging and environment theory: A focus on housing (pp. 33–60). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
23.
GolantS., & LaGrecaA. (1994). Housing quality of U.S. elderly households: Does aging in place matter?The Gerontologist, 34, 803–814.
24.
GumpP. (1969). Intra-setting analysis: The third grade classroom as a special but instructive case. In WillemsE. & RauschH. (Eds.), Naturalistic Viewpoints in Psychological Research (pp. 200–220). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
25.
HaldemannV., & WisterA. (1993). Environment and aging. Journal of Canadian Studies, 28, 30–44.
26.
HummonD. (1986). City mouse, country mouse: The persistence of community identity. Qualitative Sociology, 9, 3–25.
27.
HummonD. (1992). Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In AltmanI. & LowS. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 253–279). New York: Plenum.
28.
HummonD. (1995). Place attachment: Observations on multiple ties to home, community, and region. In R. Feldman & M. Fried (Organizers). Functions and dysfunctions of place attachment. Symposium conducted at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Environmental Design Research Association, Boston, MA.
29.
JacobsenG., & AlbertsonB. (1987). Social and economic change in rural Iowa: The development of rural ghettoes. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 10–11, 58–65.
30.
KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KaplanS.BardwellL., & SlakterD. (1993). The museum as a restorative environment. Environment and Behavior, 25, 725–742.
32.
KentD. P. (1972). Social policy and program considerations in planning for the aging. In KentD. P.KastenbaumR., & SherwoodS. (Eds.), Research planning and action for the elderly (pp. 3–19). New York: Behavioral Publications.
33.
LawtonM. P. (1998). Environment and aging: Theory revisited. In ScheidtR. & WindleyP. (Eds.), Environment and aging theory: A focus on housing (pp. 1–32). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
34.
LowS., & AltmanI. (1994). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In AltmanI. & LowS. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). New York: Plenum.
35.
Norris-BakerC., & ScheidtR. (1990). Place attachment among older residents of a “ghost town”: A transactional approach. In SelbyR.AnthonyK.ChoiJ., & OrlandB. (Eds.), Coming of age (pp. 333–342). Oklahoma, City, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
36.
Norris-BakerC., & ScheidtR. (1994). From ‘Our Town’ to ‘Ghost Town’?: The changing context of home for rural elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 38, 181–202.
37.
O'BryantS. (1983). The subjective value of “home” to older homeowners. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 1, 29–43.
38.
OresjoE. (1985). The residents' view of urban renewal—Norra Gota in Boras. Paper presented at The Future is Now, A Home Equity Conversion Conference, Lunds University, Lund, Sweden.
39.
RodinJ. (1987). Personal control through the life course. In AbiesR. (Ed.), Life Span Perspectives and Social Psychology (pp. 103–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
RodinJ. (1989). Sense of control: Potentials for intervention. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 503, 29–42.
41.
RoweJ., & KahnR. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37, 433–440.
42.
RowlesG. (1987). A place to call home. In CarstensenL. & EdelsteinB. (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Gerontology (pp. 335–353). New York: Pergamon.
43.
RowlesG. (1990). Place attachment among the small-town elderly. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 11, 103–120.
44.
RowlesG. (1993). Evolving images of place in aging and aging in place. Generations, 17, 65–70.
45.
RubinsteinR. (1989). The home environments of older people: A description of the psychological processes linking person and place. Journal of Gerontology, 44, S45–S53.
46.
RubinsteinR., & ParmeleeP. (1992). Attachment to place and the representation of the life course by the elderly. In AltmanI. & LowS. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 139–165). New York: Plenum.
47.
RyffC., & EssexM. (1992). The interpretation of life experience and well-being: The sample case of relocation. Psychology and Aging, 7, 507–517.
48.
ScheidtR. (1993). Place and personality in adult development. In KastenbaumR. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adult development (pp. 370–377). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
49.
ScheidtR., & Norris-BakerC. (1990). A transactional approach to environmental stress among older residents of rural communities. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 11, 5–30.
50.
ScheidtR., & Norris-BakerC. (1991, November). A behavior setting analysis of environmental stress among older residents of declining rural communities. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Francisco, CA.
51.
ScheidtR., & Norris-BakerC. (1993). The environmental context of poverty among older residents of economically endangered Kansas towns. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 12, 335–348.
52.
ScheidtR., & WindleyP. (1985). The ecology of aging. In BirrenJ. & ShaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp. 245–258). New York: Academic Press.
53.
SchroederF. (1980). Types of American towns and how to reach them. Southern Quarterly, 19, 104–135.
54.
SchulzR., & BrennerG. (1977). Relocation of the aged: A review and theoretical analysis. Journal of Gerontology, 32, 323–333.
55.
ShumakerS., & StokolsD. (1982). Residential mobility as a social issue and research topic. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 1–19.
56.
SommersD., & RowellK. (1992). Factors differentiating elderly residential movers and nonmovers: A longitudinal analysis. Population Research and Policy Reviews, 11, 249–262.
57.
StokolsD. (1995). The paradox of environmental psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 821–837.
58.
StokolsD., & ShumakerS. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. In HarveyJ. (Ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment (pp. 441–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
StokolsD., & ShumakerS. (1982). The psychological context of residential mobility and well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 149–171.
60.
TalbotJ., & KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1991). The benefits of nearby nature for elderly apartment users. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 33, 119–130.
61.
TomstamL. (1992). The Quo Vadis of gerontology: On the scientific paradigm of gerontology. The Gerontologist, 32, 318–323.
62.
ToyamaT. (1988). Identity and milieu: A study of relocation focusing on the reciprocal changes in elderly people and their environment. Unpublished manuscript, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
63.
WickerA. (1979). An introduction to ecological psychology.New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
WickerA. (1987). Behavior settings reconsidered: Temporal stages, resources, internal dynamics. In StokolsD. and AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 613–653). New York: Wiley & Sons.
