Abstract
The results of experimental studies of reminiscing are not as uniformly optimistic about its therapeutic value as is the theoretical literature. Moreover, anecdotal evidence regarding the impact of reminiscence interventions is more positive than the statistical evidence. This study suggests reasons for these previous findings, and examines data from a discussion group intervention in thirty nursing homes, in which 185 residents completed pre- and posttests. It analyzes the characteristics of participants in relation to modifications in selected attitudes and behaviors over the intervention period. Analysis of variance and discriminant analysis revealed no significant relationships between attitudinal or behavioral modifications and demographic or other characteristics, with one exception. Value-choices made by participants were related to such modifications. The findings are interpreted in terms of the “mental adaptability” of participants and the compensatory nature of reminiscence in an institutional setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
