Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In developmental studies of spatial perspective taking, it is important to clearly distinguish imagining body movement from other related cognitive information processing, to capture the genuine features of this ability in aging. This study examined the characteristics of these abilities in the older adults by comparing differences among age groups. A video game task was devised to evaluate response times from various angles of rotation. Four hundred twenty-eight healthy individuals aged 6 to 79 years (eight age groups at 10-year intervals) participated. Average response times for each age group confirmed a curvilinear change that accelerated from childhood to early adulthood and decelerated in later life. However, older participants did not display inferior performance compared with the younger adults on the response times to rotate an imaginary self to a 180° position. These results confirm previous findings that spatial perspective taking, particularly imagining body movement, remains robust in normal aging.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baltes

P. B.

Lindenberger

(1997). Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window at the study of cognitive aging? Psychology and Aging, 12, 12–21.

Levine

(1982). You-are-here maps: Psychological considerations. Environment and Behavior, 14, 221–237.

May

(2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 163–206.

McDonald

Stuart-Hamilton

(2002). Egocentrism in older adults: Piaget's three mountains task revisited. Educational Gerontology, 28, 35–43.

Newcombe

(1989). The development of spatial perspective taking. In Reese

H. W.

(Ed.), Advances in child and behavior (pp. 203–247). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Noda

(2010). Manipulative strategies prepare for mental rotation in young children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 746–762.

Ohta

R. J.

Walsh

D. A.

Krauss

I. K.

(1981). Spatial perspective taking ability in young and elderly adults. Experimental Aging Research, 7, 45–63.

Park

D. C.

Smith

A. D.

Lautenschlager

Earles

J. L.

Frieske

Zwahr

(1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 621–637.

Piaget

Inhelder

(1956). The child's conception of space, Langdon

F. J.

Lunzer

J. L.

(Trans.). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

10.

Quaiser-Pohl

Rohe

A. M.

Amberger

(2010). The solution strategy as an indicator of the developmental stage of preschool children's mental-rotation ability. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 95–100.

11.

Qureshi

A. W.

Apperly

I. A.

Samson

(2010). Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Cognition, 117, 230–236.

12.

Rosser

R. A.

Ensing

S. S.

Mazzeo

Horan

P. F.

(1985). Visual perspective taking in children: Further ramifications of an information-processing model. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146, 379–387.

13.

Ruby

Decety

(2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 546–550.

14.

Schultz

(1991). The contribution of solution strategy to spatial performance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 474–491.

15.

Watanabe

(2011). Distinctive features of spatial perspective-taking in the elderly. Journal of Aging and Human Development, 72, 225–241.

16.

Watanabe

Katagi

Ishikawa

Kawamura

(2008). Development of a spatial cognition test for the old handicapped. Paper presented at the 20th Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development (p. 389). Würzburg, Germany.

17.

Watanabe

Takamatsu

(2012). Features of lifelong development in spatial perspective-taking. Paper presented at the 22th Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development (p. 362). Edmonton, Canada.

18.

Wraga

Shephard

J. M.

Churcha

J. A.

Inati

Kosslyn

S. M.

(2005). Imagined rotations of self versus objects: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1351–1361.

19.

Yamadori

Ashina

Fujii

Tsukiura

Okuda

Osaka

(1999). The nature of age-related decline on the performance of the reading span task. Brain and Cognition, 39, 19–22.

20.

Zacks

J. M.

(2008). Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: A meta-analysis and review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1–19.

Spatial Perspective Taking is Robust in Later Life

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References