Studies of theory of mind (ToM) abilities in older age groups have yielded mixed results. Thirteen earlier studies are reviewed: these often had small sample sizes, and varied in educational level of older participants. We hypothesized that educational level would be an important factor for ToM in elderly participants, and especially in a non-Western country. We investigated performance on ToM and non-mental story tasks in 250 participants in three age groups (young, middle-aged, and old) in Colombia. There was a decline with ToM as well as non-mental task abilities with age. However, a strong effect of education was found in the old group; those with good educational attainment performed at the same level as young participants, and outperformed the middle-aged group. The possibility of a cohort effect for the middle-aged group is discussed. It is concluded that educational opportunities are a significant protective factor for ToM abilities in elderly populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaltesP. B., & KunzmannU. (2003). Wisdom. The Psychologist, 16, 131–132.
2.
BaltesP. B., & SchaieK. W. (1976). On the plasticity of intelligence in adulthood and old age: Where Horn and Donaldson fail. American Psychologist, 31, 720–725.
3.
Baron-CohenS.JollifeT.MortimoreC., & RobertsonM. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813–822.
4.
BirrenJ. E., & FisherL. M. (1990). Conceptualizing wisdom: The primacy of affect-cognition relations. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 317–332). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CallaghanT.RochatP.LillardA.ClauxM. L.OddenH.ItakuraS. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning: Evidence from five cultures. Psychological Science, 16, 378–384.
6.
CharltonR. A.BarrickT. R.MarkusH. S., & MorrisR. G. (2009). Theory of mind associations with other cognitive brain functions and brain imaging in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 24, 338–348.
7.
CharmanT.RuffmanT., & ClementsW. (2002). Is there a gender difference in false belief development?Social Development, 11, 1–10.
8.
DumontheilI.ApperlyI. A., & BlakemoreS-J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13, 331–338.
9.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E., & McHughP. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
10.
GermanT. P., & HehmanJ. A. (2006). Representational and executive selection resources in “theory of mind”: Evidence from compromised belief-desire reasoning in old age. Cognition, 101, 129–152.
11.
HappéF. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154.
12.
HappéF. G. E.WinnerE., & BrownellH. (1998). The getting of wisdom: Theory of mind in old age. Developmental Psychology, 34, 358–362.
13.
HeddenT., & GabrieliJ. D. E. (2004). Insight into the ageing mind: A view from cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 5, 87–97.
14.
KeightleyM. L.WinocurG.BurianovaH.HongwanishkulD., & GradyC. L. (2006). Age effects on social cognition: Faces tell a different story. Psychology and Aging, 21, 558–572.
MacPhersonS. E.PhillipsL. H., & SalaDella S. (2002). Age, executive function, and social decision making: A dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 17, 598–609.
17.
MaylorE. A.MoulsonJ. M.MuncerA-M., & TaylorL. A. (2002). Does performance on theory of mind tasks decline in old age?British Journal of Psychology, 93, 465–485.
18.
McKinnonM. C., & MoscovitchM. (2007). Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored. Cognition, 102, 179–218.
19.
MitchellP. (1997). Introduction to theory of mind. London, UK: Arnold.
20.
PernerJ., & HowesD. (1992). “He thinks he knows”: And more developmental evidence against simulation (role-taking) theory. Mind and Language, 7, 72–86.
21.
PernerJ.LeekamS. R., & WimmerH. (1987). Three-year-olds difficulty with false beliefs: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125–137.
22.
PhillipsL. H.MacLeanR. D. J., & AllenR. (2002). Age and the understanding of emotions: Neuropsychological and sociocognitive perspectives. Journal of Gerontology, Psychological Sciences, 57B, P526–P530.
23.
RabbittP. (2005). Cognitive changes across the lifespan. In JohnsonM. L. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of age and aging (pp. 190–199). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24.
RussellT. A.TchanturiaK.RahmanQ., & SchmidtU. (2007). Sex differences in theory of mind: A male advantage on Happe's “cartoon” task. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1554–1564.
25.
SalthouseT. A., & NesselroadeJ. R. (2002). An examination of the Hofer and Sliwinski (2001) evaluation. Gerontology, 48, 18–21.
26.
SaltzmanJ.StraussE.HunterM., & ArchibaldS. (2000). Theory of mind and executive functions in normal human aging and Parkinson's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 781–788.
27.
SlessorG.PhillipsL. H., & BullR. (2007). Exploring the specificity of age-related differences in theory of mind tasks. Psychology and Aging, 22, 639–643.
28.
StaudingerU. (1999). Older and wiser?International Journal of Behavioural Development, 23, 641–664.
29.
SternbergR., & JordanJ. (Eds.). (2005). A handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives. New York, NY & Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
