Previous studies suggested that older adults are more likely to engage in heuristic decision-making than young adults. This study used eye tracking technique to examine young adults' and highly educated older adults' attention toward two types of decision-relevant information: heuristic cue vs. factual cues. Surprisingly, highly educated older adults showed the reversed age pattern—they looked more toward factual cues than did young adults. This age difference disappeared after controlling for educational level. Additionally, education correlated with attentional pattern to decision-relevant information. We interpret this finding as an indication of the power of education: education may modify what are thought to be “typical” age differences in decision-making, and education may influence young and older people's decision-making via different paths.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeiseckerA. E. (1988). Aging and the desire for information and input in medical decisions: Patient consumerism in medical encounters. Gerontologist, 28, 330–335.
2.
BergC. A.MeeganS. P., & KlaczynskiP. (1990). Age and experiential differences in strategy generation and information requests for solving everyday problems. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 615–639.
3.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD., & CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.
4.
CassilethB. R.ZupkisR. V.Sutton-SmithK., & MarchV. (1980). Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 92, 832–836.
5.
DeberR. B.KraetschmerN., & IrvineJ. (1996). What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?Archives of Internal Medicine, 156, 1414–1420.
6.
DrorI. E.KatonaM., & MungurK. (1998). Age differences in decision making: To take a risk or not?Gerontology, 44, 67–71.
7.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E., & McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
8.
HackT. F.DegnerL. F., & DyckD. G. (1994). Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Social Science Medicine, 39, 279–289.
9.
JohnsonM. M. (1990). Age differences in decision making: A process methodology for examining strategic information processing. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 75–78.
10.
LeventhalE. A.LeventhalH.SchaeferP., & EasterlingD. (1993). Conservation of energy, uncertainty reduction, and swift utilization of medical care among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 48, 78–86.
11.
MalyR. C.LeakeB., & SillimanR. A. (2004). Breast cancer treatment in older women: Impact of the patient-physician interaction. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 1138–1145.
12.
ManorB. R., & GordonE. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in the free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128, 85–93.
13.
MataR.SchoolerL. J., & RieskampJ. (2007) The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging, 22, 796–810.
14.
MatherM.. (2006). A review of decision making processes: Weighing the risks and benefits of aging. In CarstensenL. L. & HartelC. R. (Eds.), When I'm 64 (pp. 145–173). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15.
MeyerB. J. F.TalbotA. P., & RanalliC. (2007). Why older adults make more immediate treatment decisions about cancer than younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 22, 505–524.
16.
MillerT. R., & WolinskyF. D. (2007). Self-rated health trajectories and mortality among older adults. The Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 62B, S22–S27.
17.
PelliD. G.RobsonJ. G., & WilkinsA. J. (1988). The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clinical Vision Science, 2, 187, 199.
18.
PetersE.FinucaneM. L.MacGregorD. G., & SlovicP. (2000). The bearable lightness of aging: Judgment and decision processes in older adults. In National Research Council, SternP. C., & CarstensenL. L. (Eds.), The aging mind: Opportunities in cognitive research (Appendix C, pp. 144–165). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
19.
PetrisekA. C.LaliberteL. L.AllenS. M., & MorV. (1997). The treatment decision-making process: Age differences in a sample of women recently diagnosed with nonrecurrent, early-stage breast cancer. Gerontologist, 37, 598–608.
20.
PierceP. F. (1993). Deciding on breast cancer treatment: A description of decision behavior. Nursing Research, 42, 22–28.
21.
ShahA. K., & OppenheimerD. M. (2009). Heuristic made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 207–222.
22.
StreufertS.PogashR.PiaseckiM., & PostG. M. (1990). Age and management team performance. Psychology & Aging, 5, 551–559.
23.
ThorntonW., & DumkeH. A. (2005). Age differences in everyday problem-solving and decision-making effectiveness: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Aging, 20, 85–99.
24.
TunP. A., & LachmanM. E. (2008). Age differences in reaction time and attention in a national telephone sample of adults: Education, sex, and task complexity matter. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1421–1429.
25.
WechslerD. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
26.
YatesJ. F., & PatalanoA. L. (1999). Decision making in aging. In ParkD. C.MorrellR. W., & ShifrenK. (Eds.), Processing of medical information in aging patients: Cognitive and human factors perspectives (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
ZacharyR. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale, revised manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
28.
ZwahrM. D.ParkD. C., & ShifrenK. (1999). Judgments about estrogen replacement therapy: The role of age, cognitive abilities, and beliefs. Psychology & Aging, 14, 179–191.
