We developed a measure of preparation for future care needs (PFCN) which consists of three parts: a) attitudes regarding the usefulness of planning for future care needs and toward the risk of needing help or care in the future; b) processes of preparation (becoming aware of future care needs, avoidance of preparation, gathering information, developing preferences, concrete planning); and c) contents of planning for short- and long-term care needs. Validity data of the questionnaire are reported based on 590 older adults (65–92 years). Engaging in preparation processes was associated with habitual decision styles, higher satisfaction with preparation, and greater knowledge of services. Greater vulnerability to needing future care was associated with higher expectations of needing care and more preparation. Internal consistency and stability of the measure based on 96 seniors was acceptable for almost all scales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AspinwallL., & TaylorS. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 417–436.
2.
BergC. A.StroughJ.CalderoneK.MeeganS. P., & SansoneC. (1997). Planning to prevent everyday problems from occurring. In FriedmanS. L. & ScholnickE. K. (Eds.), Why, how, and when do we plan? The developmental psychology of planning (pp. 209–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
BogdanR. C., & BiklenS. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BrechlingB., & SchneiderC. (1993). Preserving autonomy in early stage dementia. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 20, 17–33.
5.
ClementsJ. (1995, April 11). Dear mom and dad: Here's something that's easier to read than to discuss. The Wall Street Journal, p. C1.
6.
DeimlingG.SmergliaV., & BarresiC. (1990). Health care professionals and family involvement in care-related decisions concerning older patients. Journal of Aging and Health, 2, 310–315.
7.
DeVellisR. F. (1991). Scale development. Theory and applications.Newbury Park: Sage.
8.
EinhornH. J., & HogarthR. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgement and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 52–88.
9.
FerraroK. F., & FarmerM. M. (1999). Utility of health data from social surveys: Is there a gold standard for measuring morbidity?American Sociological Review, 64, 303–315.
10.
FriedmanS. L., & ScholnickE. K. (1997). An evolving “blueprint” for planning: Psychological requirements, task characteristics, and social-cultural influences. In FriedmanS. L. & ScholnickE. K. (Eds.), The developmental psychology of planning: Why, how, and when do we plan? (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
GeorgeL. K. (1996). Social factors and illness. In BirrenJ. E. & SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th edition, pp. 229–252). San Diego: Academic Press.
12.
GilgunJ. F. (1995). We shared something special: The moral discourse of incest perpetrators, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 265–281.
13.
GurinG.VeroffJ., & FieldS. (1960). Americans view their mental health: A nation-wide interview study.New York: Basic Books.
14.
HafenM.Jr. (1999). Preparation for caregiving by parents of children with disabilities: An exploratory study. Unpublished master's thesis, Utah State University, Logan.
15.
HagestadG. O., & BurtonL. M. (1986). Grandparenthood, life context and family development. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 471–484.
16.
HammondK. J. (1990). Case based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognitive Science, 14, 385–443.
17.
HeymanD., & JeffersF. (1965). Observations on the extent of concern and planning by the aged, for possible chronical illness. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 13, 153–159.
18.
HighD. (1990). Who will make health care decisions for me when I can't?Journal of Aging and Health, 2, 291–309.
19.
HobbsF. B., & DamonB. L. (1996). 65+ in the United States.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
HolahanC. J., & MoosR. (1986). Personality, coping, and family resources in stress resistence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 389–395.
21.
HoldenK.McBrideT., & PerozekM. (1997). Expectations of nursing home use in the Health and Retirement Study: The role of gender, health, and family characteristics. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 52B, S240–S251.
22.
HubermanM. A., & MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–429). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
23.
JanisI. L., & MannL. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment.New York: Free Press.
24.
JetteA. (1996). Disability trends and transitions. In BinstockR. & GeorgeL. K. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (4th edition, pp. 94–117). San Diego: Academic Press.
25.
KaplanG. A.StrawbridgeW. J.CamachoT., & CohenR. D. (1993). Factors associated with change in physical functioning in the elderly: A six-year prospective study. Journal of Aging and Health, 5, 140–153.
26.
KellyL. E.KnoxV. J., & GekoskiW. L. (1998). Women's views of institutional versus community-based long-term care. Research on Aging, 20, 218–245.
27.
KleinT., & SalaskeI. (1994). Determinanten des Heimeintritts im Alter und Chancen seiner Vermeidung [Determinants of entrance into a nursing home in old age and chances of avoiding it]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie, 27, 442–455.
28.
KulysR., & TobinS. S. (1980). Interpreting the lack of future concern among the elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 11, 111–126.
29.
LawtonM. P., & BrodyE. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9, 179–186.
30.
MahoneyF. I., & BarthelD. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.
31.
MaloneyS. K.FinnJ.BloomD., & AndersenJ. (1996). Personal decisionmaking styles and long-term care choices. Health Care Financing Review, 18, 141–156.
32.
McCaslinR. (1988). Reframing research on service use among the elderly: An analysis of recent findings. The Gerontologist, 28, 592–599.
33.
MertonR. K. (1966). Anticipatory socialization. In BiddleB. J. & ThomasE. J. (Eds.), Role theory: Concepts and research (pp. 347–350). New York: John Wiley.
34.
PattersonB. (1996, February 13). Advance planning eases friction between parties. Times Colonist (Victoria), p. C1.
35.
PenningM. J. (1995). Health, social support, and the utilization of health services among older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 50B, S330–339.
36.
PinquartM., & SörensenS. (2000). Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Vorbereitung von Senioren auf einen zukünftigen Hilfs- and Pflegebedarf (FVP): Skalenkonstruktion und teststatistische Überprüfung [Development of a measure of preparation for future help and care needs for seniors: Scale construction and statistical validation]. Diagnostica, 46, 130–139.
37.
Schmitz-ScherzerR.SchickI.KühnD.PlagemanK., & KrauthoffU. (1977). Vorbereitung auf das Alter? [Preparation for old age?]. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Jugend, Familie und Gesundheit.
38.
ScholnickE. K., & FriedmanS. L. (1993). Planning in context: Developmental and situational considerations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 145–167.
39.
ScottS. G., & BruceR. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 818–831.
40.
ShellenbargerS. (1994, November 9). With elder care comes a professional and personal crisis. The Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
41.
SkarbornM., & NickiR. (1996). Worry among Canadian seniors. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 43, 169–178.
42.
SörensenS. (1993). Preparation for caregiving: The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of thinking ahead in multi-generation families. Unpublished dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
43.
SörensenS. (1998). Predictors of anticipating caregiving in multi-generation families. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 14(4), 499–520.
44.
SörensenS., & PinquartM. (2000, August). Path models of future care preparation: Western and Eastern Germany. Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.
45.
SörensenS., & PinquartM. (2000a). Preparation for future care needs: Styles of preparation used by older Eastern German, United States, and Canadian women. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 15(4), 349–381.
46.
SörensenS., & PinquartM. (2000b). Vulnerability and access to resources as predictors of preparation for future care needs in the elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 12(3), 275–300.
47.
SörensenS., & ZaritS. H. (1996). Preparation for caregiving: A study of multi-generational families. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 42, 43–63.
48.
State of Utah Economics and Demographic Research Database (1998). Population projections by five year age groups.www.qget.state.ut.us
49.
StewartS.PersonS.LukeC. G., & HorowitzJ. D. (1998). Effects of home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and out-of-hospital deaths. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46, 174–180.
50.
StoneR.CafferataG. L., & SanglJ. (1987). Caregivers of the frail elderly: A national profile. The Gerontologist, 27, 616–626.
51.
TeresiJ.HolmesD.HolmesM., & BergmanS. (1989). Factors relating to institutional risk among elderly members of Israeli kibbutzim. The Gerontologist, 29, 203–208.
52.
van de VijverF., & LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
