Background. “Recovery” is the new mantra for reforming the mental health system and occupational therapists have embraced the change. Purpose. To critically examine the concept of recovery across five dimensions: clarity, simplicity, generality, accessibility, and importance. Key Issues. The implicit assumption that the recovery concept is universally applicable is challenged. This examination raises concerns about the application of the recovery concept cross culturally, across the lifespan, and at different levels of service delivery. Implications. The meaning and application of the recovery concept will need to be cautiously applied to populations traditionally underserved by the mental health care system, including seniors, visible minorities, children and youth, recent immigrants, and refugees. Research exploring the meaning and process of recovery across diverse groups and at different levels of service delivery is needed. Occupational therapists must continue to critically examine the concept of recovery to position our field thoughtfully and inclusively within mental health care reform.
Australian Health Ministers. (2003). National mental health plan 2003–2008. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
2.
BaeS-W., & BrekkeJ. S. (2002). Characteristics of Korean-Americans with Schizophrenia: A cross-ethnic comparison with African-Americans, Latinos, and Euro-Americans. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 28 (4): 703–717.
3.
BonneyS., & StickleyT. (2008). Recovery and mental health: A review of the British literature. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, 15, 140–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01185.x
4.
CameronR. P., TonH., YangC., EndrigaM. C., LanM.-E, & KoikeA. K. (2008). The Transcultural Wellness Center: Rehabilitation and recovery in Asian and Pacific Islander mental health care. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 7, 284–314.
ChamberlainJ. (1984). Speaking for ourselves: An overview of the ex-psychiatric inmates' movement. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 8 (2), 56–63.
7.
ChinnP. L., & KramerM. K. (1995). Critical reflection on nursing theory. In ChinnP. L. & KramerM. K. (Eds.) Theory and Nursing: A Systematic Approach (pp. 125–137). New York: Mosby.
8.
DavidsonL., LawlessM. S., & LearyF. (2005). Concepts of recovery: Competing or complementary?Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18, 664–667.
9.
DavidsonL., O'ConnellM. J., TondoraJ., LawlessM., & EvansA. C. (2005). Recovery in serious mental illness: A new wine or just a new bottle?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice36, 480–487. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.36.5.480
10.
DavidsonL., O'ConnellM. J., TondoraJ., StyronT, & KangasK. (2006). The top ten concerns about recovery encountered in mental health system transformation. Psychiatric Services, 57, 640–645. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.5.640
11.
DeeganP. E. (1996). Recovery as a journey of the heart. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 19 (3), 91–97.
12.
DickersonF. B. (2006). Disquieting aspects of the recovery paradigm. Psychiatric Services, 57, 647. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.5.647
13.
FernandoS. (2008). We shall overcome!Openmind, 149, 25.
14.
FinlaysonM. (2007). Why theory matters. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 291.
15.
FriesonB. J. (2007). Recovery and resilience in children's mental health: Views from the field. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31 (1), 38–48. doi: 10.2975/31.1.2007.38.48
16.
GaryF. A. (2005). Stigma: Barrier to mental health care among ethnic minorities. Issues in Mental Health Nursing26, 979–999. doi: 10.1080/01612840500280661
17.
HardingC. M., ZubinJ., & StraussJ. S. (1992). Chronicity in schizophrenia: Revisited. British Journal of Psychiatry, 161 (Suppl. 18), 27–37.
18.
IdaD. J. (2007). Cultural competency and recovery within diverse populations. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31 (1), 49–53. doi: 10.2975/31.1.2007.49.53
19.
JacobsonN., & GreenleyD. (2001). What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication. Psychiatric Services, 52, 482–485.
20.
KrupaT., & ClarkC. (2004). Occupational therapy in the field of mental health: Promoting occupational perspectives on health and well-being. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 69–74.
21.
LapselyH., NikoraL., & BlackR. (2002). Kia Mauri Tau! Narratives of recovery from disabling mental health problems. Report of the University of Waikato Mental Health Narratives Project. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
LiebermanR. P., & KopelowiczA. (2005). Recovery from schizophrenia: A concept in search of research. Psychiatric Services, 56 (6), 735–742.
24.
LloydC., WaghornG., & WilliamsP. L. (2008). Conceptualising recovery in mental health rehabilitation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71 (8), 321–328.
25.
MausbachB. T., MooreR., BowieC., CardenasV., & PattersonT. L. (2009). A review of instruments for measuring functional recovery in those diagnosed with psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35, 307–318. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn152
26.
MeadS., & CopelandM.E. (2000). What recovery means to us: Consumers' perspectives. Community Mental Health Journal, 36 (3), 315–328. doi: 10.1023/a:1001917516869
27.
Mental Health Commission. (1998). Blueprint for mental health services in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
OnkenS. J., CraigC. M., RidgwayP., RalphR. O., & CookJ. A. (2007). An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: A review of the literature. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31 (1), 9–22. doi:10.2975/31.1.2007.9.22
31.
OnkenS. J., DumontJ. M., RidgwayP., DornanD. H., & RalphR. O. (2002). Mental health recovery: What helps and what hinders? A national research project for the development of recovery facilitating system performance indicators. Phase one research report: A national study of consumer perspectives on what helps and hinders mental health recovery. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) National Technical Assistance Center (NTAC).
32.
PiatM., SabettiJ., & CoutureA. (2008). Do consumers use the word “Recovery”?Psychiatric Services, 59, 446–447. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.4.446
33.
PowersB. A., & KnappT. R. (2006). Dictionary of nursing theory and research (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
34.
RalphR. O., KidderK., & PhillipsD. (2000). Can we measure recovery? A compendium of recovery and recovery-related instruments. Retrieved from http://www.hsri.org/
35.
GruhlK. L. Rebeiro (2005). Reflections on… The recovery paradigm: Should occupational therapists be interested? Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72, 96–102.
SellsD., BorgM., MarinI., MezzinaR., ToporA., & DavidsonL. (2006). Arenas of recovery for persons with severe mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 9 (1), 3–16. doi: 10.1080/15487760500339402
38.
TaV. M., JuonH. S., GielenA. C., SteinwachsD., & DugganA. (2008). Disparities in use of mental health and substance abuse services by Asian and Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander women. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 35, 20–36. doi: 10.1007/sll414-007-9078-y
39.
The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.06.001
40.
ThibeaultR., & HebertM. (1997). A congruent model of health promotion in occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy International, 4, 271–293. doi: 10.1002/oti.60
41.
ToothB., KalyanasundaramV., GloverH., & MomenzadahS. (2003). Factors consumers identify as important to recovery from schizophrenia. Australasian Psychiatry, 11 (Suppl. 1), 570–577.
ZwickerJ. G., & HarrisS. R. (2009). A reflection on motor learning theory in pediatric occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 29–37.
