Background. Although problems with power sharing are frequently described in discussions about client-centred practice, little research has explored occupational therapists' experiences with this model of service delivery. To critically examine this aspect of occupational therapy, an insider study was conducted. Purpose. The objectives of the study were to explore therapists' experiences with client-centred practice and to reveal how power works within this practice and in the health service environment. Method. Semi-structured interviews with 9 therapists were conducted and a thematic analysis of these transcripts was completed. A variety of institutional documents were reviewed and analysed. Results. Three main themes were identified: the different interpretations of occupational therapy discourse, the power of context and the continuum of client-therapist interactions. Clinical Implications. It is important to consider the various competing discourses and institutional practices that frame the therapeutic relationship when evaluating methods to improve client-centred practice.
AbberleyP. (1995). Disabling ideology in health and welfare-the case of occupational therapy. Disability and Society, 10, 2, 221–232.
2.
BibykB., DayD. G., MorrisL., O'BrienM., RebeiroK. L., SeguinP. (1999). Who's in charge here? The client's perspective on client-centred care. OT Now, 1, 11–13.
3.
BlainJ., & TownsendE. (1993). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice: impact study findings. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 5, 271–285.
4.
BorlandK. (1991). Interpretative conflict. In GluckS. B. and PataiD. (Eds.), Women's words: the feminist practice of oral history (pp. 63–75). New York: Routledge.
5.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: A Canadian occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
6.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (2004). CAOT statistics track trends in occupational therapy, OT Now, 6, 3, 8–9.
7.
CarpenterC. & HammellK. W. (2000). Evaluating qualitative research. In HammellK.W., CarpenterC. & DyckI. (Eds.) Using qualitative research. A practical introduction for occupational and physical therapists (pp. 107–120). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
8.
CoffeyA., & AtkinsonP. (1996) Making sense of qualitative data. Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CrabtreeJ. L., & LyonsM. (1997). Focal points and relationships: A study of clinical reasoning. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 2, 57–64.
10.
DavisK. (1993). Nice doctors and invisible patients: The problems of power in feminist common sense. In ToddA. D. & FisherS. (Eds.) The social organization of doctor patient communication (pp. 243–266). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
11.
Department of National Health and Welfare, & Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1983). Guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Cat. H39- 33/1983E. Ottawa, ON: Author.
12.
Department of National Health and Welfare & Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1986). Intervention guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Cat. H39- 100/1986E. Ottawa, ON: Author.
13.
DomholdtE. (1993). Physical therapy research. Principles and applications. Toronto, ON: W.B. Saunders Company.
14.
DugganR. (2005) Reflection as a means to foster client-centred practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72, 2, 103–112.
15.
FalardeauM., & DurandM. J. (2002). Negotiation-centred versus client-centred: Which approach should be used?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 3, 135–142.
16.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality. An Introduction. Volume I. New York: Vintage Books.
18.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/KnowledgeGordonC. (Ed.) New York: Pantheon Books.
19.
GageM. (1999). Physical disabilities: Meeting the challenges of client-centred practice. In SumsionT. (Ed.) Client-centred practice in occupational therapy. A guide to implementation (pp. 98–101). Toronto, ON: Churchill Livingstone.
20.
GageM., & PolatajkoH. (1995). Naming practice: The case for the term client-driven. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 3, 115–118.
21.
HabermasJ. (1970). Knowledge and interest. In EmmettD. and MacIntyreA. (Eds.), Sociological theory and philosophical analysis. London, England: MacMillan.
HammersleyM., & AtkinsonP. (1995). Ethnography. Principles in practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
24.
Harmon-JonesE. & MillsJ. (Eds.) (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
25.
HardingS. (1998). Subjectivity, experience, and knowledge: An epistemology from/fro Rainbow Coalition politics. In RogersM.F. (Ed.), / Contemporary feminist theory. A text reader / (pp. 79–108). Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill.
26.
HartsockN. (1990). Foucault on power: A theory for women? In NicholsonL.J. (Ed.) Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
27.
HartsockN. (1998). The feminist standpoint revisited and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
28.
LabontéR. (1996) Measurement and practice: Power issues in quality of life, health promotion and empowerment. In RenwickR., BrownI. & NaglerM. (Eds.), Quality of life in health promotion and rehabilitation: Conceptual approaches, issues, and applications (pp. 132–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
LatherP. (1991). Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routeledge.
LawM, BaptisteS., McCollM. A., OpzoomerA., PolatajkoH., & PollockN. (1990). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 82–87.
32.
LawM., BaptisteS., & MillsJ. (1995). Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 5, 250–257.
33.
LawM. & MillsJ. (1998) Does client-centred practice make a difference? In LawM. (Ed.), Client-centred occupational therapy (pp. 20–29). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
34.
LawM., PolatajkoH., PollockN., McCollM. A., CarswellA., & BaptisteS. (1994). Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: clinical and measurement issues. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 4, 191–197.
35.
MattinglyC. F. (1994) Occupational therapy as a two-body practice. The body as machine. The lived body. In MattinglyC.F. and FlemmingM. Hayes (eds.), Clinical Reasoning: Forms of Inquiry in a Therapeutic Practice (pp. 37–93). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
36.
MeesonB. (1998). Occupational therapy in community mental health, part 2: factors influencing intervention choice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 2, 57–62.
37.
NorbyE. & BellnerA. (1995). The helping encounter. Occupational therapists' perception of therapeutic relationships. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 9, 41–46.
38.
NorthenJ. G., RustD. M., NelsonC. E., & WattsJ.H. (1995) Involvement of adult rehabilitation patients in setting occupational therapy goals. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 214–220.
39.
OpieA. (1998). “Nobody asked me for my view:” User's empowerment by multidisciplinary health teams. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 188–206.
40.
PeloquinS. M. (1993) The depersonalization of patients: A profile gleaned from narrative. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 9, 830–837.
41.
PollockN., McCollM. A., & CarswellA. (1999). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. In SumsionT. (Ed.) Client-centred practice in occupational therapy. A guide to implementation (pp. 103–114). Toronto, ON: Churchill Livingstone.
42.
RebeiroK. L. (2000). Client perspectives on occupational therapy practice: Are we truly client-centred?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 1, 7–14.
43.
SankarA. (1986). Out of the clinic into the home: Control and patient-physician communication. Social Sciences & Medicine, 22, pp. 973–982.
44.
SmithD. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic. A feminist sociology. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
45.
SmithD. E. (1990a). The conceptual practices of power. A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
46.
SmithD. E. (1990b). Texts, facts and femininity. Exploring the relations of ruling. New York: Routledge.
47.
SternM., RestallG. & RipatJ. (2000). The use of self reflection to improve client-centred processes. In FearingV. G. & ClarkJ. (Eds.), Individuals in context: A practical guide to client-centred practice (pp. 145–158). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
48.
SumsionT. (1993). Client-centred practice: the true impact. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 1, 6–8.
49.
SumsionT. (1999). Implementation issues. In SumsionT. (Ed.), Client-centred practice in occupational therapy. A guide to implementation (pp. 28–39). Toronto, ON: Churchill Livingstone.
50.
SumsionT. (2005). Facilitating client-centred practice: Insights from clients. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 1, 13–20.
51.
SumsionT. & SmythG. (2000). Barriers to client-centred-ness and their resolution. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 1, 15–21.
52.
ToomeyM., NicholsonD., & CarswellA. (1995). The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 5, 242–249.
53.
TownsendE. (1998). Good intentions overruled: A critique of empowerment in the routine organisation of mental health services. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
54.
TownsendE. (2003) Reflections on power and justice in enabling occupation. Canadian Journal of occupational Therapy, 70, 5, 74–87.
55.
TownsendE., LangilleL., & RipleyD. (2003). Professional tensions in client-centred practice: Using institutional ethnography to generate understanding and transformation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 1, 17–28.
56.
WhitefordG. (2000). Occupational deprivation: Global challenge in the new millennium. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 5, 200–204.
57.
WilkinsS., PollockN., RochonS., & LawM. (2001). Implementing client-centred-practice: Why is it so difficult to do?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 2, 70–79.
