For nearly 20 years, Canadian occupational therapists have attached great importance to the client-centred approach within their practice. Professionals have agreed to define this approach through a philosophy built around the concepts of respect, power and partnership. But no reported work has really clarified what is meant by these three fundamental concepts.
This article attempts to define the concepts of respect and power in the therapist-client relationship through a review of occupational therapy and related health and social sciences literature. It raises the question: “In the professional-client relationship, should the power reside with the client or is a more balanced approach needed? ” This paper also proposes using the term negotiation instead of partnership, since negotiation seems to offer more applications for occupational therapy practice. The objective of the authors who advocate for greater negotiation between client and therapist is to stimulate analysis.
BowenR. (1996). The issue is- should occupational therapy adopt a consumer based model of service delivery?American Journal of Occupational therapy, 50, 899–902.
2.
BurkeM.1991. Styles de pouvoir. Paris: Dunod.
3.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists & Department of National Health and Welfare. (1983). Guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Ottawa, ON: Department of National Health and Welfare.
4.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists & Department of National Health and Welfare. (1986). Intervention guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Ottawa, ON: Department of National Health and Welfare.
5.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1991). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
6.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists & Health Canada. (1993). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred mental health practice. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
7.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1997). Enabling Occupation: An Occupation Perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
8.
ChewningB.SleathB. (1996). Medication decision-making and management: A client-centered model. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 389–398.
9.
CorringD.CookJ. (1999). Client-centred care means that I am a valued human being. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 71–82.
10.
DahlR. A. (1957). The concept of power. Béhavioral Sciences, 2, 201–215.
DélivréF. (1997). Le pouvoir de négocier. Paris: Interéditions.
13.
DupontC. (1990). La négociation; conduite, théorie, applications. Paris: Dalloz.
14.
EganM.DuboulozC-JVon ZweckC.VallerandJ. (1998). The client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 136–142.
15.
EmersonJ. (1962). Power-dépendance relations. American Sociology Review, 27, 331–340.
16.
FearingV. G.LawM.ClarkJ. (1997). An occupational performance process model: Fostering client and therapist alliances. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 7–15.
17.
FisherR.UryW. (1982). Comment réussir une négociation. Paris: Éditions du seuil.
18.
FortinP.BoulianneB. (1998). Le suicide: Interventions et enjeux éthiques. Sainte-Foy, Quebec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
19.
FrenchJ.R.P.RavenB. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (dir.) (1959). Studies of social power (pp. 150–168) Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute of social research.
20.
GageM. (1995). Re-engineering of health care: Opportunity or threat for occupational therapists?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 197–207.
21.
GagnonJ.H. (1987). L'art de bien négocier. Montréal, Québec: Agence d'arc.
22.
GiddensA. (1987). La constitution de la société. Paris: PUF.
23.
KanwalG. S. (1997). Hope, respect and flexibility in the psychotherapy of schizophrenia. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 33, 133–150.
24.
LawM.BaptisteS.Carswell-OpzoomerA.McCollM. A.PolatajkoH.PollockN. (1991). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
25.
LawM.BaptisteS.MillsJ. (1995). Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 250–257.
26.
LeclercC. (1998). Quatre visions du pouvoir dans les groupes restreints. Dans Savoie, A. Leadership et pouvoir: équipes et groupes. Lausanne, Suisse: Lena éditions.
27.
LerouxM.DelainM. (1992). Les dimensions cachées de la négociation. Paris: INSEP.
28.
MeyerA. (1977). The philosophy of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 639–642.
29.
PeloquinS. M. (1997). Should we trade person-centered service for a consumer-based model?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 612–615.
30.
RebeiroK. L. (2000). Client perspectives on occupational therapy practice: Are we truly client-centred?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 7–14.
31.
RogersC. (1939). The clinical treatment of the problem child. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32.
RogersC. (1965). Client-centered therapy; its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
33.
SimJ. (1998). Respect for autonomy: Issues in neurological rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 3–10.
34.
St-ArnaudY. (1999). Le changement assisté. Compétences pour intervenir en relations humaines. Montréal, Québec: Gaétan Morin éditeur.
35.
SumsionT. (1993). Client-centred practice: The true impact. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 6–8.
36.
SumsionT. (1999). A study to determine a British occupational therapy definition of client-centred practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 52–58.
37.
SumsionT.SmythG. (2000). Barriers to client-centredness and their resolution. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 15–21.
38.
TownsendE. (1998). Occupational therapy language: Matters of respect, accountability and leadership. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 45–49.
39.
TownsendL. (1999). La pratique centrée sur le client: De bonnes intentions souvent contrecarrées. Actualités ergothérapiques, 1, 8–10.
40.
WhalleyK. (1995). Spinal cord injury; Quality of life; Occupational therapy: is there a connection. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 151–157.
41.
WhalleyK. (2001). Intrinsicality: Reconsidering spirituality, meaning(s) and mandates. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 186–193.
