In subjects with different types of cleft palate, palatal shape and symmetry were evaluated utilizing the moiré contourography technique. The sample consisted of 95 subjects with cleft palate and 68 controls. The differences between cleft and control subjects in the transverse and anteroposterior location of the highest point of the palate, palatal axis angle, and the palatal index were assessed by analysis of variance. Effects of cleft type, gender, developmental stage of the dentition, missing teeth, and eight skeletal and pharyngeal cephalometric variables on palatal shape and symmetry were assessed using multiple-regression analyses. In comparison with the noncleft individuals, the cleft palate subjects showed parallel but clearly more remarkable asymmetry in palatal shape and position of the first maxillary molars. The anteroposterior location of the deepest point in the palate was more posterior, and the palate was relatively shallower. The severity of the cleft type affected both the anteroposterior and transverse position of the highest point in palatal morphology.
AthanasiouA., MazaheriM., ZarriniaK.Longitudinal study of the dental arch dimensions in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.J Pedod1987a; 11: 253–268.
2.
AthanasiouA., MazaheriM., ZarriniaK.Longitudinal study of the dental arch dimensions in hard and soft palate clefts.J Pedod1987b; 12: 35–47.
3.
BerkowitzS.Stereophotogrammetric analysis of casts of normal and abnormal palates.Am J Orthod1971; 60: 1–18.
4.
BerkowitzS., GonzalesG., Nghiem-PhuL.An optical profilometer—a new instrument for the three-dimensional measurement of cleft palate casts.Cleft Palate J1982; 19: 129–138.
5.
BerkowitzS., KrischerJ., PruzanskyS.Quantitative analysis of cleft palate casts. A geometric study.Cleft Palate J1974; 11: 134–161.
6.
BerkowitzS., PruzanskyS.Stereophotogrammetry of serial casts of cleft palate.Cleft Palate J1968; 38: 136–149.
7.
BisharaS.E., BurkeyP.S., KharoufJ.G.Dental and facial asymmetries: a review.Angle Orthod1994; 64: 89–98.
8.
BisharaS.E., De ArrendondoR.S.M., ValesH.P., JacobsenJ.R.Dentofacial relationship in persons with operated clefts; comparisons between three cleft types.Am J Orthod1985; 87: 481–507.
DiewertV.M., ShiotaK.Morphological observations in normal primary palate and cleft lip embryos in the Kyoto collection.Teratology1990; 41: 663–667.
11.
GroveH.F., ChristensenL.V.Relationship of the first primary palatine rugae to the maxillary canines in man.J Oral Rehabil1988; 15: 133–139.
12.
HellquistR., PonténB., SkoogT.The influence of the cleft length and palatoplasty on the dental arch and deciduous occlusion in cases of clefts of the secondary palate.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg1978; 12: 45–54.
13.
HuddardA.G.The effect of form and dimension on the management of the maxillary arch in unilateral cleft lip and palate conditions.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg1987; 21: 53–56.
14.
KilpeläinenP.V.J., Laine-AlavaM.T., LammiS.Palatal morphology and the type of clefting.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1996; 33: 000–000.
15.
KilpeläinenP.V.J., LaineM.T., VäyrynenM.Reliability of the moiré method in study of tooth and palatal morphology.Proc Finn Dent Soc1990; 86: 89–97.
16.
KlamiO., HorowitzS.L.An analysis of the relationship between posterior dental cross-bite and vertical palatal asymmetry.Am J Orthod1979; 76: 51–58.
17.
KorkhausG.A new orthodontic symmetrograph.Int J Orthod1930; 16: 665–668.
18.
KurolJ., BerglundL.Longitudinal study and cost-benefit analysis of the effect of the early treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentitions.Eur J Orthod1992; 14: 173–179.
19.
LearC.S.C.Symmetry analysis of the palate and maxillary dental arch.Angle Orthod1968; 38: 56–60.
20.
LebretL.Growth changes of the palate.J Dent Res1962; 41: 1391–1404.
21.
LiliusG.P.Epidemiology of cleft lip and palate in Finland 1975–1985. Academic Dissertation, University of Helsinki1992, Yliopistopaino.
22.
LundströmA.Some asymmetries of the dental arches, jaws and skulls and their etiological significance.Am J Orthod1961; 47: 81–106.
23.
MazaheriM., HardingR.L., CooperJ.A., MeierJ.A., JonesT.S.Changes in arch form and dimensions of cleft patients.Am J Orthod1971; 60: 19–32.
24.
MarkovicM.The role of the orthodontist in the treatment of adolescents with orofacial clefts.Int Dent J1986; 36: 131–136.
25.
MølstedK., DahlE.Asymmetry of the palate in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate J1990; 27: 184–192.
26.
MølstedK., DahlE., BrattströmV., McWilliamJ., SembG.A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate; Evaluation of maxillary asymmetry.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1993; 30: 22–28.
27.
OkazakiK., KatoM., OnizukaT.Palate morphology in children with palatalized articulation.Ann Plast Surg1991; 26: 156–163.
RossR.B.Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.Part 7: An overview of treatment and facial growth, Cleft Palate J1987; 24: 71–77.
31.
RossR.B., JohnstonM.C.Cleft lip and palate.Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins,1972.
32.
SembG.A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP team.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1991; 28: 1–21.
33.
SmahelZ.Variations in craniofacial morphology with severity of isolated cleft palate.Cleft Palate J1984; 21: 140–158.
34.
SmahelZ., BreichaM.Differences in craniofacial morphology between complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip and palate in adults.Cleft Palate J1983; 20: 113–127.
35.
SugieM., OhbaH., MizuianiM., OhnoN.Hard palate shape in the Japanese and Indian children on moiré topography with lateral movement of a grating.Kaibogaku Zasshi1993; 68: 522–535.
36.
TakasakiH.The development and present status of moiré topography.Opt Acta1979; 26: 1009–1019.
37.
TakasakiH.Moiré topography from its birth to practical application.Optics and Lasers in Engineering1982; 3: 3–14.
38.
TownsendG.C., RichardsL.C., SekikawaM., BrownT., OzakiT.Variability of palatal dimensions in South Australian twins.J Forensic Odontostomatol1990; 8: 3–13.
