Recommendations are made for strengthening data description and analysis in craniofacial biology. Special emphasis is placed on longitudinal data, and PC programs for accomplishing appropriate analyses in this context are described and made available to interested readers. Some more general recommendations are treated in less detail. These include the effective description of data using stem-and-leaf displays and/or boxplots, the use of decision-analytic methods in the management of patients with dentofacial deformities, and the valid application of certain statistical methods in single-subject studies. Finally, it is conjectured that computer-intensive methods such as randomization tests and jackknifing will play an increasingly prominent role in craniofacial research.
CohenJ.. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Revised Ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 1987.
2.
CullisB.R., McGilchristC.A.. A model for the analysis of growth data from designed experiments.Biometrics1990; 46: 131–142.
3.
DallalG.E.. TRACK: A FORTRAN program for calculating the Foulkes-Davis tracking index.Comp Biol Med1989; 19: 367–371.
4.
DawsonD.V., TodorovA.B., ElstonR.C.. Confidence bands for the growth of head circumference in achondroplastic children during the first year of life.Am J Med Genet1980; 7: 529–536.
5.
Dawson-SaundersB.. The instruction of biostatistics in medical school.Am Stat1987; 21: 263–266.
FleissJ.L.. The design and analysis of clinical experiments.New York: John Wiley, 1986.
10.
FoulkesM.A., DavisC.E.. An index of tracking for longitudinal data.Biometrics1981; 37: 439–446.
11.
FreimanJ.A., ChalmersT.C., SmithH.Jr., KeuhlerR.R.. The importance of beta, the type II error and the sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial.N Engl J Med1978; 299: 690–694.
12.
FrommB.S., SnyderV.L.. Research design and statistical procedures used in The Journal of Family Practice.J Fam Pract1986; 23: 564–566.
13.
GardnerM.J., AltmanD.G.. Confidence intervals rather than P values: Estimation rather than hypothesis testing.BMJ1986; 292: 746–750.
14.
GoldsteinH.. The design and analysis of longitudinal studies.New York: Academic Press, 1979.
15.
GoldsteinH.. Measuring the stability of individual growth patterns.Ann Hum Biol1981; 8: 549–557.
16.
GuireK.E., KowalskiC.J.. Mathematical description and representation of developmental change functions on the intra- and interindividual levels. In: NesselroadeJ.R., BaltesP.B., eds. Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development.New York: Academic Press, 1979: 89–110.
17.
HealyM.J.R.. Is statistics a science?J R Stat Soc A1978; 141: 385–393.
18.
HoelP.G.. Methods for comparing growth type curves.Biometrics1964; 20: 859–872.
19.
HokansonJ.A., LuttmanD.J., WeissG.B.. Spectrum and frequency of use of statistical techniques in psychiatric journals.Psychiatry1986; 143: 1118–1125.
KassirerJ.P.. Decision analysis: a progress report.Ann Intern Med1987; 106: 270–291.
22.
KowalskiC.J.. Orthometrics. In: VigP.S., RibbensK.A., eds. Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics. Monograph 19, Craniofacial Growth Series.Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1986: 225–236.
23.
KowalskiC.J., GuireK.E.. Longitudinal data analysis.Growth1974; 38: 131–169.
24.
KowalskiC.J., SchneidermanE.D.. Tracking: concepts, methods and tools. In: van VarkG.N., SchaafsmaW., CorrucciniR.S., eds. Mullivariate methods in bioanthropology.Florence, Italy: II Sedecesimo (in press).
25.
KraemerH.C., ThiemannS.. How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research.Newwbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.
26.
MarksR.G.. Designing a research project.New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1982.
27.
McMahanC.A.. An index of tracking.Biometrics1981; 37: 447–455.
28.
McNamaraJ.A.. A method of cephalometric evaluation.Am J Orthod1984; 86: 449–469.
29.
MostellerF., TukeyJ.W.. Data analysis and regression.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
30.
NeufeldR.W.J.. Clinical quantitative methods.New York: Grune and Stratten, 1977.
31.
NoreenE.W.. Computer intensive methods for testing hypotheses.New York: John Wiley, 1989.
32.
OdehR.E., FoxM.. Sample size choice: charts for experiments with linear models.New York: Marcel Dekker, 1975.
33.
PotthoffR.F., RoyS.N.. A generalized mullivariate analysis of variance model useful especially for growth curve problems.Biometrika1964; 51: 313–326.
34.
RansohoffD.F.. Science and diagnosis. In: VigP.S., RibbensK.A.. eds. Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics. Monograph 19, Craniofacial Growth Series.Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1986: 61–73.
35.
RaoC.R.. Some statistical methods for the comparison of growth curves.Biometrics1958; 14: 1–17.
36.
RaoC.R.. Prediction of future observations with special reference to linear models. In: KrishnaiahP.R., ed. Mullivariate analysis IV.Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977: 193–208.
37.
RaoC.R.. Prediction of future observations in growth curve models.Stat Science1987; 2: 434–471.
38.
ReznickR.K., Dawson-SaundersE., FolseJ.R.. A rationale for the teaching of statistics to surgical residents.Surgery1987; 101: 611–617.
39.
SchneidermanE.D., KowalskiC.J.. Implementation of Rao's one-sample polynomial growth curve model using SAS.Am J Phys Anthrop1985; 67: 323–333.
40.
SchneidermanE.D., KowalskiC.J.. Implementation of Hills' growth curve analysis for unequal lime intervals using GAUSS.Am J Hum Biol1989; 1: 31–42.
41.
SchneidermanE.D., KowalskiC.J., Ten HaveT.R.. A GAUSS program for computing an index of tracking from longitudinal observations.Am J Hum Biol1990; 2: 475–490.
42.
SchneidermanE.D., KowalskiC.J., Ten HaveT.R., WillisS.M.. Computation of Foulkes and Davis' nonparametric tracking index using GAUSS.Am J Hum Biol1992a; 4: 417–420.
43.
SchneidermanE.D., KowalskiC.J., Ten HaveT.R., WillisS.M.. A PC program for computing the Foulkes-Davis tracking index for polynomial growth curves.Am J Hum Biol (in press).
44.
SchneidermanE.D., WillisS.M., KowalskiC.J., Ten HaveT.R.. A PC program for comparing tracking indices in several independent groups.Am J Hum Biol1992b; 4: 399–401.
45.
SchulhofR.J.. Consideration of airway in orthodontics.J Clin Orthod1978; 12: 440–444.
StanekE.J.. A two-step method for understanding and fitting growth curve models.Stat in Med1990; 9: 841–851.
48.
Ten HaveT.R., KowalskiC.J., SchneidermanE.D.. A PC program for analyzing one-sample longitudinal data sets which satisfy the two-stage polynomial growth curve model.Am J Hum Biol1991; 3: 269–279.
49.
Ten HaveT.R., KowalskiC.J., SchneidermanE.D.. A PC program for obtaining orthogonal polynomial regression coefficients for use in polynomial regression analysis.Am J Hum Biol1992; 4: 403–416.
50.
TukeyJ.W.. Exploratory data analysis.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
51.
VigP.S.. Reflections of the rationality of orthodontics: toward a new paradigm. In: VigP.S., RibbensK.A., eds. Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics. Monograph 19, Craniofacial Growth Series.Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1986: 15–59.
52.
VigP.S., SpaldingP.M., LintzR.R.. Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for impaired nasal respiration.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1991; 99: 354–360.
53.
VigP.S., RibbensK.A., eds. Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics. Monograph 19, Craniofacial Growth Series. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development, 1987.
54.
WareJ.H., WuM.C.. Tracking: prediction of future values from serial observations.Biometrics1981; 37: 424–437.
ZerbeG.O.. Randomization analysis of the completely randomized design extended to growth and response curves.J Am Stat Assn1979a; 74: 215–221.
57.
ZerbeG.O.. Randomization analysis of randomized blocks extended to growth and response curves.Comm in Stat A1979b; 8: 191–205.
58.
ZerbeG.O., WalkerS.H.. A randomization test for comparison of groups of growth curves with different polynomial design matrices.Biometrics1977; 33: 653–657.
