Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetric Method to Identify and Measure the Palatal Surface Area in Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online January, 2016
Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetric Method to Identify and Measure the Palatal Surface Area in Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
To assess a three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetric method for area delimitation and evaluation of the dental arches of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Obtained data were also used to assess the 3D changes occurring in the maxillary arch with the use of orthopedic therapy prior to rhinocheiloplasty and before the first year of life.
Design
Within the collaboration between the Università degli Studi di Milano (Italy) and the University CES of Medellin (Colombia), 96 palatal cast models obtained from neonatal patients with UCLP were analyzed using a 3D stereophotogrammetric imaging system.
Main Outcome Measures
The area of the minor and greater cleft segments on the digital dental cast surface were delineated by the visualization tool of the stereophotogrammetric software and then examined. “Trueness” of the measurements, as well as systematic and random errors between operators' tracings (“precision”) were calculated.
Results
The method gave area measurements close to true values (errors lower than 2%), without systematic measurement errors for tracings by both interoperators and intraoperators (P > .05). Statistically significant differences (P < .05) were noted for alveolar segment and time.
Conclusions
Maxillary segments have the potential for growth during presurgical orthopedic treatment in the early neonatal period. The cleft segment delimitation on digital dental casts and area measurements by the 3D stereophotogrammetric system revealed an accurate (true and precise) method for evaluating the stone casts of newborn patients with UCLP.
AynechiN., LarsonB.E., Leon-SalazarV., BeiraghiS.Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition. Angle Orthod.2011; 81: 245–252.
2.
BaekS.H., SonW.S.Difference in alveolar molding effect and growth in the cleft segments: 3-dimensional analysis of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2006; 102: 160–168.
3.
BerkowitzS., DuncanR., EvansC., FriedeH., Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M., Prahl-AndersonB., RosensteinS.Timing of cleft palate closure should be based on the ratio of the area of the cleft to that of the palatal segments and not on age alone. Plast Reconstr Surg.2005; 115: 1483–1499.
4.
BrescianiE.Validazione di uno Strumento di Sterofotogrammetria come Strumento di Misura ed Esempio di Applicazione in Campo Medico.Milano, Italy: Politecnico di Milano; 2010. Dissertation.
5.
DarvannT.A., HermannN.V., ErsbollB.K., KreiborgS., BerkowitzS.Palatal surface area of maxillary plaster casts—a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 381–390.
6.
de MenezesM., RosatiR., FerrarioV.F., SforzaC.Accuracy and reproducibility of a 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetric imaging system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2010; 68: 2129–2135.
7.
EderM., BrockmannG., ZimmermannA., PapadopoulosM.A., Schwenzer-ZimmererK., ZeilhoferH.F., SaderR., PapadopulosN.A., KovacsL.Evaluation of precision and accuracy assessment of different 3-D surface imaging systems for biomedical purposes. J Digit Imaging.2013; 26: 163–172.
8.
EichhornW., BlessmannM., VorwigO., GehrkeG., SchmelzleR., HeilandM.Influence of lip closure on alveolar cleft width in patients with cleft lip and palate. Head Face Med.2011; 7: 3.
9.
FourieZ., DamstraJ., GerritsP.O., RenY.Accuracy and repeatability of anthropometric facial measurements using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2011; 48: 623–630.
10.
GhoddousiH., EdlerR., HaersP., WertheimD., GreenhillD.Comparison of three methods of facial measurement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2007; 36: 250–258.
11.
GrabowskiR., KoppH., StahlF., GundlachK.K.Presurgical orthopaedic treatment of newborns with clefts–functional treatment with long-term effects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2006; 34(suppl 2): 34–44.
12.
GwilliamJ.R., CunninghamS.J., HuttonT.Reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on three-dimensional facial scans. Eur J Orthod.2006; 28: 408–115.
13.
HeX., ShiB., JiangS., LiS., ZhengQ., YanW.110 infants with unrepaired unilateral cleft lip: an anthropometric analysis of the lip and nasal deformities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2010; 39: 847–852.
14.
HeidbuchelK.L., Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M., Van't HofM.A., KramerG.J., Prahl-AndersenB.Effects of early treatment on maxillary arch development in BCLP. A study on dental casts between 0 and 4 years of age. J Craniomaxillofac Surg.1998; 26: 140–147.
15.
Huanca GhislanzoniL.T., LinebergerM., CevidanesL.H., MapelliA., SforzaC., McNamaraJ.A.Evaluation of tip and torque on virtual study models: a validation study. Prog Orthod.2013; 14: 19.
KimS.W., ParkS.O., ChoiT.H., Hai doT.Change in upper lip height and nostril sill after alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip alveolus patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.2012; 65: 558–563.
18.
KookM.S., JungS., ParkH.J., OhH.K., RyuS.Y., ChoJ.H., LeeJ.S., YoonS.J., KimM.S., ShinH.K.A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods. J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2014; 42: 648–656.
19.
López-PalacioA.M., Cerón-ZapataA.M., GómezD.F., Dátvila-CalleA.P., Ojalvo-AriasM.A.Nasal changes with nasoalveolar molding in Colombian patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Pediatr Dent.2012; 34: 239–244.
20.
MelloB.Z., FernandesV.M., CarraraC.F., MachadoM.A., GaribD.G., OliveiraT.M.Evaluation of the intercanine distance in newborns with cleft lip and palate using 3D digital casts. J Appl Oral Sci.2013; 21: 437–442.
21.
OteroL., BermudezL., LizarragaK., TangcoI., GannabanR., MelesD.A comparative study of facial asymmetry in Philippine, Colombian, and Ethiopian families with nonsyndromic cleft lip palate. Plast Surg Int.2012; 2012: 580769.
22.
ProffP., WeingartnerJ., RottnerK., BayerleinT., SchoebelS., KadukW., GedrangeT.Functional 3-D analysis of patients with unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus and palate (UCLAP) following lip repair. J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2006; 34(suppl 2): 26–30.
23.
RedlichM., WeinstockT., AbedY., SchneorR., HoldsteinY., FischerA.A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res.2008; 11: 90–95.
24.
RosatiR., De MenezesM., RossettiA., SforzaC., FerrarioV.F.Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2010; 138: 84–88.
25.
RosatiR., RossettiA., De MenezesM., FerrarioV.F., SforzaC.The occlusal plane in the facial context: inter-operator repeatability of a new three-dimensional method. Int J Oral Sci.2012; 4: 34–37.
26.
RousseauP., MetzgerM., FruchtS., SchuppW., HempelM., OttenJ.E.Effect of lip closure on early maxillary growth in patients with cleft lip and palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg.2013; 15: 369–373.
27.
SabarinathV.P., ThombareP., HazareyP.V., RadhakrishnanV., AgrekarS.Changes in maxillary alveolar morphology with nasoalveolar molding. J Clin Pediatr Dent.2010; 35: 207–212.
28.
SchimmelM., ChristouP., HoustisO., HerrmannF.R., KiliaridisS., MullerF.Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2010; 137: 580.e581–580.e510; discussion 580-581.
29.
SforzaC., De MenezesM., BrescianiE., Ceron-ZapataA.M., Lopez-PalacioA.M., Rodriguez-ArdilaM.J., Berrio-GutierrezL.M.Evaluation of a 3D stereophotogrammetric technique to measure the stone casts of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2012; 49: 477–483.
30.
SforzaC., de MenezesM., FerrarioV.Soft- and hard-tissue facial anthropometry in three dimensions: what's new. J Anthropol Sci.2013; 91: 159–184.
31.
SwennenG.R., GrimaldiH., BertenJ.L., KramerF.J., DempfR., Schwestka-PollyR., HausamenJ.E.Reliability and validity of a modified lateral cephalometric analysis for evaluation of craniofacial morphology and growth in patients with clefts. J Craniofac Surg.2004; 15: 399–112; discussion 413-414.
32.
UgoliniA., CerrutoC., Di VeceL., GhislanzoniL.H., SforzaC., DoldoT., Silvestrini-BiavatiA., CaprioglioA.Dental arch response to Haastype rapid maxillary expansion anchored to deciduous vs permanent molars: a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod.2015; 85: 570–576.
YangC.J., PanX.G., QianY.F., WangG.M.Impact of rapid maxillary expansion in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients after secondary alveolar bone grafting: review and case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol.2012; 114: e25–30.
35.
YeB., RuanC., HuJ., YangY., ThomasJ., ZhangG.A comparative study on the measurements of palatal shelf area and gradient for adult patients with unoperated cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2012; 49: 561–565.
