Adults with craniofacial conditions experience more psychosocial problems than adults in the general population, but little is known about the factors that render a person more or less susceptible to these problems. Guided by research on adults with other conditions that affect appearance, this study examined predictors of psychosocial outcome in adults with craniofacial conditions.
Design
Single-sample cross-sectional design.
Setting
The Australian Craniofacial Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, one of the main craniofacial treatment centers in Australia.
Participants
Adults (N = 93; 36.9% of the potential sample) with congenital craniofacial conditions (excluding cleft lip and/or cleft palate) who were treated in the Australian Craniofacial Unit.
Main Outcome Measures
All participants completed measures assessing anxiety, depression, and quality of life (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Short-Form Health Survey) and variables predicted to affect these outcomes (SF-36 Health Survey - Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Cleft Satisfaction Profile, Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, Derriford Appearance Scale).
Results
Multiple regression analyses revealed that anxiety was predicted by social support, self-esteem, and fear of negative evaluation, while depression was predicted by self-esteem and social support. Physical quality of life was not predicted by any of the measures. Satisfaction with appearance, gender, age, and education were not related to outcome.
Conclusions
Interventions designed to increase perceived social support and self-esteem and reduce fear of negative evaluation appear to be indicated and may assist in establishing a causal relationship between these variables.
Akhtar-DaneshN.LandeenJ.Relation between depression and sociodemographic factors. Int J Ment Health Syst.2007 Sep 4; 1(1): 4.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics.Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA), 2006, Table 2. Postal area (POA) index of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage, data cube; 2008. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2033.0.55.001/. Accessed August 21, 2008.
3.
BerkN.W.CooperM.E.LiuY.MarazitaM.L.Social anxiety in Chinese adults with oral-facial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 126–133.
4.
BessellA.MossT.P.Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature. Body Image.2007; 4: 227–238.
5.
BjellandI.DahlA.A.HaugT.T.NeckelmannD.The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res.2002; 52: 69–77.
6.
BodenJ.M.FergussonD.M.HorwoodL.J.Does adolescent self-esteem predict later life outcomes? A test of the causal role of self-esteem. Dev Psychopathol.2008; 20: 319–339.
7.
CarrT.HarrisD.JamesC.The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59): a new scale to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol.2000; 5: 201–215.
8.
CarrT.MossT.HarrisD.The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol.2005; 10: 285–298.
9.
ChuoB.SearleY.JeremyA.RichardB.M.SharpI.SlatorR.The continuing multidisciplinary needs of adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac.2008; 45: 633–638.
10.
CochraneV.M.SladeP.Appraisal and coping in adults with cleft lip: associations with well-being and social anxiety. Br J Med Psychol.1999; 72: 485–503.
11.
CohenJ.A power primer. Psychol Bull.1992; 112: 155–159.
12.
DalgardO.S.MykletunA.RognerudM.JohansenR.ZahlP.H.Education, sense of mastery and mental health: results from a nation wide health monitoring study in Norway. BMC Psychiatry.2007; 7: 20.
13.
EdwardsT.C.TopolskiT.D.Kapp-SimonK.A.AspinallC.L.PatrickD.L.What difference can a minute make? Social skills and first impressions of youth with craniofacial differences. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2011; 48: 91–97.
14.
EisermanW.Unique outcomes and positive contributions associated with facial difference: expanding research and practice. Cleft Palate Craniofac.2001; 38: 236–244.
15.
FieldA.P.Discovering Statistics Using SPSS.3rd ed.London: Sage;2009.
16.
FryersT.MelzerD.JenkinsR.BrughaT.The distribution of the common mental disorders: social inequalities in Europe. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health.2005 Sep 5; 1: 14.
17.
Kapp-SimonK.A.McGuireD.E.LongB.C.SimonD.J.Addressing quality of life issues in adolescents: social skills interventions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 45–50.
18.
KentG.KeohaneS.Social anxiety and disfigurement: the moderating effects of fear of negative evaluation and past experience. Br J Clin Psychol.2001; 40: 23–34.
19.
KishV.LansdownR.Meeting the psychosocial impact of facial disfigurement: developing a clinical service for children and families. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry.2000; 5: 497–511.
20.
KleveL.RumseyN.Wyn-WilliamsM.WhiteP.The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural interventions provided at Outlook: a disfigurement support unit. J Eval Clil Pract.2002; 8: 387–395.
21.
LansdownR.RumseyN.BradburyE.CarrT.PartridgeJ.Visibly Different: Coping with Disfigurement.Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann;1997.
22.
LearyM.R.A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull.1983; 9: 371–375.
23.
LiossiC.Appearance Related Concerns Across the General and Clinical Populations.London: City University;2003. Dissertation.
24.
ManiM.CarlssonM.MarcussonA.Quality of life varies with gender and age among adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2010 Sep;47(5): 491–498.
25.
MarcussonA.AkerlindI.PaulinG.Quality of life in adults with repaired complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 379–385.
26.
MartinC.R.NewellR.J.Factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychol Health Med.2004; 9: 327–336.
27.
MeyersonM.D.Resilience and success in adults with Moebius syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 231–230.
28.
MoosR.H.HolahanC.J.Adaptive tasks and methods of coping with illness and disability. In: MartzE.LivnehH., eds. Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects.New York: Springer;2007: 107–126.
29.
MossT.CarrT.Understanding adjustment to disfigurement: the role of the self-concept. Psychol Health.2004; 19: 737–748.
30.
MossT.RosserB.Psychosocial adjustment to visible difference. Psychologist.2008; 21: 492–495.
31.
MurphyH.MurphyE.K.Comparing quality of life using the World Health Organisation Quality of Life measure (WHOQOL-100) in a clinical and non clinical sample: exploring the role of self-esteem, self-efficacy and social functioning. J Ment Health.2006; 15: 289–300.
32.
PapadopolousL.BorR.LeggC.Coping with the disfiguring effects of vitiligo: a preliminary investigation into the effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Br J Med Psychol.1999; 72: 385–396.
33.
PatrickD.L.TopolskiT.D.EdwardsC.L.AspinallK.A.Kapp-SimonN.J.RumseyR.P.StraussR.P.ThomasC.R.Measuring the quality of life of youth with facial differences. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 538–547.
34.
PinquartM.SorensenS.Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging.2000; 15: 187–224.
35.
RamstadT.OttemE.ShawW.C.Psychosocial adjustment in Norwegian adults who had undergone standardised treatment of complete cleft lip and palate II: self-reported problems and concerns with appearance. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.1995; 29: 329–336.
36.
RobertsR.M.MathiasJ.L.Psychosocial functioning in adults with congenital craniofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2011 May 2. [Epub ahead of print]
37.
RobertsR.M.ShuteR.The experience of living with a craniofacial condition: perspectives of children, adolescents and parents. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry.2011; 16: 317–334.
38.
RobinsonE.RumseyN.PartridgeJ.An evaluation of the impact of social interaction skills training for facially disfigured people. Br J Plast Surg.1996; 9: 281–289.
39.
RosenbergM.Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Reprint edition. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press;1989.
40.
RumseyN.ClarkeA.WhiteP.Wyn-WilliamsM.GarlickW.Altered body image: appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. J Adv Nurs.2004; 48: 443–453.
41.
RumseyN.HarcourtD.The Psychology of Appearance.Maidenhead: Oxford University Press;2005.
42.
Sanson-FisherR.W.PerkinsJ.J.Adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Australia. J Clin Epidemiol.1998; 51: 961–967.
43.
SarwerD.WhitakerL.BartlettS.Psychological functioning of adolescents born with craniofacial anomalies. Craniofacial Surg.2001; 9: 224–226.
44.
SarwerD.B.BartlettS.P.WhitakerL.A.PaigeK.T.PertschukM.J.WaddenT.A.Adult psychological functioning of individuals born with craniofacial anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg.1999; 103: 412–418.
45.
SchroeversM.J.RanchorA.V.SandermanR.The role of social support and self-esteem in the presence and course of depressive symptoms: a comparison of cancer patients and individuals from the general population. Soc Sci Med.2003; 57: 375–385.
46.
SmithC.E.FernengelK.HolcroftC.GeraldK.Meta-analysis of the associations between social support and health outcomes. Ann Behav Med.1994; 16: 352–362.
47.
ThomasP.T.TurnerS.R.RumseyN.DowellT.SandyJ.R.Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1997; 34: 226–231.
48.
WareJ.E.KosinskiM.SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1.2nd ed.Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc;2001.
49.
WareJ.E.SherbourneC.D.The MOS 36-item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care.1992; 30: 473–483.
