BrewsterDCCronenwettJLHallettJW.
Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association
for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery.
J Vasc Surg.2003;37:1106–1117.
2.
ChaikofELBrewsterDCDalmanRL.
The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the
Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines. J
Vasc Surg.2009;50(4
Suppl):S2–49.
3.
Online survey: Clinical assessment of AAA
rupture risk. Are biomechanical predictors needed? VASCOPS Vascular
Diagnostics 2007. Available at http://www.vascops.com/files/survey2006.pdf. Accessed December
9, 2009.
4.
DarlingRCMessinaCRBrewsterDC.
Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The
case for early resection. Circulation.1977;56:161–164.
5.
WilsonKALeeAJHoskinsPR.
The relation between aortic wall distensibility and rupture
of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc
Surg.2003;37:112–117.
6.
FillingerMFRaghavanMLMarraSP.
In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal
aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg.2002;36:589–597.
7.
FillingerMFMarraSPRaghavanML.
Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm
during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J
Vasc Surg.2003;37:724–732.
McGloughlinTMDoyleBJ.
New approaches to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk
assessment: engineering insights with clinical gain.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.2010;
30:1687–1694.
10.
GeorgakarakosEIoannouCVPapaharilaouY.
Computational evaluation of aortic aneurysm rupture risk:
what have we learned so far?J Endovasc Ther.2011;18:214–225.
11.
VenkatasubramaniamAKFaganMJMehtaT.
A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite
element analysis for ruptured and nonruptured abdominal aortic
aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2004;28:
168–176.
12.
DoyleBJCoylePKavanaghEG.
A finite element analysis rupture index (FEARI) of electively
repaired and symptomatic/ruptured abdominal aortic
aneurysms. IFMBE Proc.2010;31:883–886.
13.
XenosMRambhiaSHAlemuY.
Patient-based abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk
prediction with fluid structure interaction modeling.
Ann Biomed Eng.2010;38:3323–3337.
14.
GasserTCAuerMLabrutoF.
Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic
aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element
simulations. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2010;40:176–185.
15.
DoyleBJCallananAMcGloughlinTM.
A comparison of modeling techniques for computing wall stress
in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomed Eng
Online.2007;6:38.
16.
SchurinkGWvan BaalenJMVisserMJ.
Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure
on the aneurysmal wall. J Vasc Surg.2000;31:501–506.
17.
RaghavanMLKratzbergJde
TolosaEM.
Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure
properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. J
Biomech.2006;39:3010–3016.
18.
ThubrikarMJAl-SoudiJRobicsekF.
Wall stress studies of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a
clinical model. Ann Vasc Surg.2001;15:355–366.
DoyleBJMcGloughlinTM.
Computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal aortic
aneurysms. In Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, McGloughlinTM,
ed, Düsseldorf, Germany:
Springer-Verlag; 2011; in
press.
21.
SpeelmanLBohraABosboomEM.
Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall
stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms. ASME
J Biomech Eng.2007;129:1–5.
22.
LiZYU-King-ImJTangTY.
Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the
computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
J Vasc Surg.2008;47:928–935.
23.
MaierAGeeMWReepsC.
Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress
analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomech
Model Mechanbiol.2010;9:511–521.
