GreenhalghRMBrownLCKwongGP. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364: 843–848.
2.
BlankensteijnJDde JongSEPrinssenM. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med.2005; 352: 2398–2405.
3.
LovegroveREJavidMMageeTR. A meta-analysis of 21,178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg.2008; 95: 677–684.
4.
SchermerhornMO'MalleyJJhaveriA. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med.2008; 358: 464–474.
5.
DiehmNDickFKatzenBT. Aortic neck dilatation after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A word of caution. J Vasc Surg.2008; 47: 886–892.
6.
DickFBrownLCPowellJT. Appraisal era for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Acta Chir Belg.2008; 108: 288–291.
7.
PrinssenMVerhoevenELVerhagenHJ. Decision-making in follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair based on diameter and volume measurements: A blinded comparison. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2003; 26: 184–187.
8.
WeverJJBlankensteijnJDMaliWP. Maximal aneurysm diameter follow-up is inadequate after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2000; 20: 177–182.
9.
KritprachaBBeebeHGComerotaAJ. Aortic diameter is an insensitive measurement of early aneurysm expansion after endografting. J Endovasc Ther.2004; 11: 184–190.
10.
BargelliniICioniRPetruzziP. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Analysis of aneurysm volumetric changes at mid-term follow up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.2005; 28: 426–433.
11.
CayneNVeithFLipsitzE. Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: Significance and methods to minimize. J Vasc Surg.2004; 39: 811–815.
12.
DiehmNKickuthRGahlB. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of 64-row computed tomography abdominal aortic aneurysm neck measurements. J Vasc Surg.2007; 45: 263–268.
13.
DiehmNKatzenBTSamuelsS. Sixty-four-detector CT angiography of infrarenal aortic neck length and angulation: Prospective analysis of interobserver variability. J Vasc Interv Radiol.2008; 19, in press.
14.
van PrehnJvan der WalMBVinckenK. Intra- and interobserver variability of aortic aneurysm volume measurement with fast CTA postprocessing software. J Endovasc Ther.2008; 15: 504–510.