We describe three cases of incidentally found lesions in the dural venous sinuses on magnetic resonance imaging, that other had erroneously considered pathological entities. We made the diagnosis of giant arachnoid granulations. The differential diagnosis with thrombosis or intrasinusal tumoral lesions was easily made on the basis of three typical radiological features of the granulations: the hyperintensity of the lesions on FLAIR, a blood vessel within the lesion and bone erosion.
KanPStevensEACouldwellWT. Incidental giant arachnoid granulation. Am J Neuroradiol.2006; 27: 1491–1492.
2.
LeachJLMeyerKJonesBV. A large arachnoid granulations involving the dorsal superior sagittal sinus: Findings on MR imaging and MR venography. Am J Neuroradiol.2008; 29: 1335–1339. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1093.
3.
MamourianACTowfighiJ. MR of giant arachnoid granulation, a normal variant presenting as a mass within the dural venous sinus. Am J Neuroradiol.1995; 16 (4 Suppl): 901–904.
4.
TrimbleCRHarnsbergerHRCastilloM. “Giant” arachnoid granulations just like CSF? Not. Am J Neuroradiol.2010; 31: 1724–1728. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2157.
5.
RocheJWarnerD. Arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: CT, MR, and MR angiographic appearance of a normal anatomic variation. Am J Neuroradiol.1996; 17 (4): 677–683.
6.
LeachJLJonesBVTomsickTA. Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: Differentiation from dural sinus disease. Am J Neuroradiol.1996; 17: 1523–1532.
7.
ChinSCChenCYLeeCC. Giant arachnoid granulation mimicking dural sinus thrombosis in a boy with headache: MRI. Neuroradiology.1998; 40 (3): 181–183. doi: 10.1007/s002340050564.
8.
ChoiHJChoCWKimYS. Giant arachnoid granulation misdiagnosed as transverse sinus thrombosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc.2008; 43: 48–50. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2008.43.1.48.
