Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Little research has been done to examine the cost-effectiveness of REC review, or the components of review that make the greatest contributions to the protection of human subjects. We describe a process used to obtain consensus on the important categories and outcomes of REC review using the Delphi method and an array of stakeholders in a limited domain of research (biomedical). Study participants recruited from the University of Michigan Medical School's RECs, REC council, and principal investigators identified the following six categories as being the most important aspects of REC review: (1) A favorable risk/benefit ratio; (2) minimization of risk to subjects; (3) clarity of consent; (4) protection of vulnerable populations; (5) protection of privacy and confidentiality; and (6) review time. We believe that this kind of information can be used to assist in the development of a metric to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of REC review in the various research domains.

Keywords

REC IRB ethical review REC review time Delphi method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. (1995). Final report: Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (Publication No. 061-000-00-848-9). Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Hsu

& Sandford

B. A.

(2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(10). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=10.

Ludwig

(1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology? Journal of Extension, 35(5), 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/1997october/tt2.html.

Meslin

E. M.

Lavery

J. V.

Sutherland

H. J.

, & Till

J. E.

(1994). Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: What criteria do research ethics board members use? REC: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 16(4), 6–10.

Powell

(2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advances Nursing, 41(4), 376–382. Retrieved from http://rachel.org/files/document/The_Delphi_Technique_Myths_and_Realities.pdf.

Taylor

H. A.

(2007). Moving beyond compliance: Measuring ethical quality to enhance the oversight of human subjects research. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 29(5), 9–14.

A Delphi Study to Establish Important Aspects of Ethics Review

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References