Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recent ethics guidelines and policies are changing the way health research is understood, governed, and practiced among Aboriginal communities in Canada. This provides a unique opportunity to examine the meanings and uses of such guidelines by Aboriginal communities themselves. This qualitative study, conducted in Labrador, Canada, with the Innu, Inuit, and Inuit-Metis, examined how communities and researchers collaborate in a co-learning environment whereby mutual interests and agendas are discussed and enacted throughout the entire research process—a process referred to an authentic research relationship. The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) Why are authentic research relationships important? (2) What is authenticity in research? (3) How do we achieve authenticity in research with Aboriginal peoples? This shift to more wholistic methodologies can be used in various contexts in Canada and internationally. This is the first study by an Aboriginal person to examine the perspectives of Aboriginal people, in an Aboriginal context, using Aboriginal methodologies.

Keywords

Aboriginal health research Aboriginal research ethics community-based research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brunger

(2006). Discrimination génétique et ethique de la recherche: Consentement et politque du risque. In Parizeau

M.H.

(Ed.), Néoracisme et Derives Généeetiques (pp. 231–246). Quebec City, Quebec: Presses de L'Université Laval.

Brunger

& Weijer

(2007). Politics, risk, and community in the Maya-ICBG case. In Lavery

Wahl

Grady

, & Emanuel

(Eds.), Ethical Issues in International Biomedical Research: A Casebook (pp. 35–42). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bull

J. R.

(2009). Authentic research relationships to improve Aboriginal health? Halifax, Nova Scotia: Atlantic Aboriginal Health Research Program.

Bull

J. R.

(2010). When multiple voices collide: Ethics realities in research involving Aboriginal peoples. Paper presented at the 21st Canadian Bioethics Society Annual Conference, Voices of Communities. Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). (2007). CIHR Guidelines for Health Research Involving Aboriginal Peoples: Draft for Consultation. Retrieved April 1, 2007 from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29134.html.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2009). Revised Draft 2nd Edition of the TCPS (December 2009). Retrieved March 10, 2010 from http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/revised-revisee/Default/.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (1993). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, edited by WHO Geneva. Retrieved April 2, 2008 from http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm.

Davis

S. M.

& Reid

(1999). Practicing participatory research in American Indian communities. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(4), 755–759.

Dei

G. J. S.

Hall

B. L.

, & Rosenberg

D. G.

(2000). Indigenous Knowledges in Global Contexts: Multiple Readings of Our World. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.

10.

Haig-Brown

& Dannenmann

(2000). Some thoughts on protocol in university/community partnership. Retrieved March 10, 2008 from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/depts/sese/csew/nall/res/16somethoughts.htm.

11.

Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. (1998). Tri-Council Policy Statement for Research Involving Humans. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/tcps-eptc/readtcps-lireeptc/.

12.

Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. (2009). Revised 2nd Edition of the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Research Involving Humans. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/revised-revisee/Default/.

13.

Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. (2010). Aboriginal Technical Advisory Committee. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/resources-ressources/reports-rapports/arei-iera/.

14.

National Aboriginal Health Organization (NAHO). (2000). Governance of Research Involving Human Subjects: Research Brief. Ottawa, Ontario.

15.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Retrieved March 1, 2008 from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm.

16.

Schnarch

(2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80–95.

17.

Smith

L. S.

(1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.

18.

Weaver

H.N.

(1997). The challenges of research in Native American communities: Incorporating principles of cultural competence. Journal of Social Service Research, 23(2), 1–15.

19.

Weijer

(1999). Protecting communities in research: Philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8(4), 501–513.

20.

Weijer

Goldsand

, & Emanuel

E.J.

(1999). Protecting communities in research: Current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nature Genetics, 23: 275–280.

21.

World Medical Association. (2000). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Retrieved March 2, 2008 from http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm.

Research with Aboriginal Peoples: Authentic Relationships as a Precursor to Ethical Research

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References