Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Bridget Pratt and Adrian Harper ( 2021) conducted a comparison of articles identified through six electronic literature searches. Their aim was to “identify ethics literature… that discussed combatting neo-colonial models of research”. They used manifest content analysis to compare the conceptual content of articles from the fields of global health (GH) and Australian Aboriginal health (AH). This innovative application of a literature review approach from literary and media studies, to health sciences in which literature reviews have traditionally focused on synthesizing evidence about intervention effectiveness, should be commended. It has potential to advance theoretical understandings of ethics in health research. However, I argue here that Pratt and Harper’s (2021) search strategy has several weaknesses, which suggests that their results must be interpreted with caution.

Keywords

literature review design research ethics theory neo-colonialism global health Aboriginal health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2007). The end of Aboriginal self-determination? Futures, 39(2), 137‐154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.01.002

Hemming

Others

(2007). Caring for Ngarrindjeri country: Collaborative research, community development and social justice. Indigenous Law Bulletin, 6(27), 6‐8. https://doi.org/10.3316/agispt.20072361

Kwaymullina

(2016). Research, ethics and indigenous peoples: An Australian indigenous perspective on three threshold considerations for respectful engagement. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 12(4), 437‐449. https://doi.org/10.20507/AlterNative.2016.12.4.8

McGowan

Sampson

Salzwedel

D. M.

Cogo

Foerster

Lefebvre

(2016). PRESS Peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 75, 40‐46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021

National Library of Australia (undated). ATSI health [electronic resource]: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health bibliography. Retrieved from https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1091858.

Pratt

Harper

(2021). Combatting neo-colonialism in health research: What can Aboriginal health research ethics and global health research ethics teach each other? Journal of Empirical Research on Research Ethics, Epub Ahead of print.

Sampson

McGowan

Cogo

Grimshaw

Moher

Lefebvre

(2009). An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(9), 944‐952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.012

Invited Commentary on “Combatting neo-Colonialism in Health Research: What can Aboriginal Health Research Ethics and Global Health Research Ethics Teach Each Other?”

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References