In this article I explore how paradigmatic polyphony can be enacted in a graduate-level qualitative research class through post-oppositional and contemplative approaches. Specifically, I use the notion of nepantlera, an Anzaldúan concept for a nomadic threshold traveler across multiple worlds, to explore ways of understanding and teaching paradigmatic polyphony. These approaches are enacted in a pedagogical narrative through arts-based activities that open up expansive spaces to explore onto-epistemological possibilities, tensions, contradictions, resistances, and a sense of interrelatedness of being.
AnzaldúaG. (1999). Borderlands la frontera: The new mestiza (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
2.
AnzaldúaG. (2002). Now let us shift… the path of conocimiento … inner work, public acts. In AnzaldúaG. E. & KeatingA. (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 540–577). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AnzaldúaG. (2009). Speaking across the divide. In KeatingA. (Ed.), The Gloria Anzaldúa reader (pp. 282–294). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BarbezatD., & BushM. (2014). Contemplative practices in higher education: Powerful methods to transform teaching and learning.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BhattacharyaK. (2009). Othering research, researching the Other: De/colonizing approaches to qualitative inquiry. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXIV, pp. 105–150). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
6.
DenzinN. K. (2008). The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 315–325. doi:10.1080/09518390802136995
7.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life.New York, NY: Anchor Books.
8.
HatchJ. A. (2006). Qualitative studies in the era of scientifically-based research: Musings of a former QSE editor. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 403–407. doi:10.1080/09518390600790308
9.
JacksonA. Y., & MazzeiL. A. (Eds.). (2009). Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research.London, England: Routledge.
10.
KeatingA. (2013). Transformation now! Toward a post-oppositional politics of change.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11.
KirbyV. (2008). Natural convers(at)ions: Or, what if culture was really nature all along?
12.
In AlaimoS. & HeckmanS. (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 214–236). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
MacLureM. (2007). “Clarity bordering on stupidity”: Where's the quality in systematic review? In SomekhB. & SchwandtT. A. (Eds.), Knowledge production: Research work in interesting times (pp. 45–70). Abdingdon, England: Routledge.
15.
MazzeiL. A. (2010). Thinking data with Deleuze. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 511–523. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.497176
16.
NorrisJ., SawyerR. D., & LundD. (Eds.). (2012). Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research.Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
17.
OhmerS. (2010). Gloria E. Anzaldúa's decolonizing ritual de conocimiento. Confluencia, 26(1), 141–153.
18.
PalmerP. J. (2014). Foreward. In BarbezatD. P. & BushM., Contemplative practices in higher education: Powerful methods to transform teaching and learning (pp. vii–x). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
PalmerP. J., & ZajoncA. (2010). The heart of higher education: A call to renewal.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
St. PierreE. A. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 13, 223–227. doi:10.1177/1532708613487862
22.
TangY.-Y., HölzelB. K., & PosnerM. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 213–225. doi:10.1038/nrn3916
23.
TurnerV. W. (1964). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. In HelmJ. (Ed.), American Ethnological Society (pp. 4–20). Seattle, WA: The Proceedings of the 1964 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society.
