This paper reports on the use of visual techniques and data as part of a multimethod investigation exploring the temporal and spatial contexts of social connections and community formation in an economically and socially heterogeneous inner city neighbourhood. The paper provides a reflective commentary on the use of two visually orientated methods (participatory mapping and walking interviews) and explores how working with the visual offers particular analytical insight. Discussion moves beyond existing debates about the benefits of using visual methods to suggest that understanding how visual methodologies illuminate social phenomena needs to take account of the participative and performative processes that underpin them.
AmsdenJ., & VanWynsbergheR. (2005). Community mapping as a research tool with youth. Action Research, 3, 357–381. doi:10.1177/1476750305058487
2.
BackL. (2007). The art of listening.Oxford, England: Berg.
3.
BackL. (2009). Researching community and its moral projects. 21st Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 4, 201–214. doi:10.1080/17450140903000316
4.
BallM., & SmithG. (2001). Technologies of realism? Ethnographic uses of photography and film. In AtkinsonP., CoffeyA., DelamontS., LoflandJ., & LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 302–320). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BergoldJ., & ThomasS. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 30.
6.
CookT. (2012). Where participatory approaches meet pragmatism in funded (health) research: The challenge of finding meaningful spaces. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 18.
7.
DayG. (2006). Community and everyday life, Abingdon, England: Routledge.
EmmelN. (2008, July). Participatory mapping: An innovative sociological method (Real Life Methods Toolkit No. 3), Manchester, England: University of Manchester.
10.
EmmelN., & ClarkA. (2008). User-engagement with community groups: The nature of engagement. Qualitative Researcher, 8, 5–8.
11.
EmmelN., & ClarkA. (2009, September). The methods used in connected lives: Investigating networks, neighbourhoods and communities (NCRM Working Paper Series 06/09). Southampton, England: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods:
12.
FelsteadA., JewsonN, & WaltersS. (2004). Images, interviews and interpretations: Making connections in visual research. In PoleC. J. (Ed.), Seeing is believing? Approaches to visual research (pp. 105–121). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
13.
FinkJ. (2012). Walking the neighbourhood, seeing the small details of community life: Reflections from a photography walking tour. Critical Social Policy, 32, 31–50. doi:10.1177/0261018311425198
14.
HeathS., FullerA., & JohnstonB. (2009). Chasing shadows: Defining network boundaries in qualitative social network analysis. Qualitative Research, 9, 645–661. doi:10.1177/1468794109343631
15.
HoganS. (2011). Images of Broomhall, Sheffield: Urban violence, and using the arts as a research aid. Visual Anthropology, 24, 266–280. doi:10.1080/08949468.2010.508996
16.
HolmG. (2008). Visual research methods: Where are we and where are we going? In Hesse-BiberS. N. & LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 325–342). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
LawJ. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3, 239–256. doi:10.1177/1749975509105533
19.
LetherbyG., ScottJ. P., & WilliamsM. (2013). Objectivity and subjectivity in social research.London, England; Sage.
20.
Moran-EllisJ., AlexanderV. D., CroninA., DickinsonM., FieldingJ., SleneyJ. & ThomasH. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6, 45–59. doi:10.1177/1468794106058870
21.
PainH. (2012). A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methodology, 11, 303–319.
22.
PauwelsL. (2012). Contemplating the state of visual research: An assessment of obstacles and opportunities. In PinkS. (Ed.), Advances in visual methodology (pp. 248–264). London, England: Sage.
23.
PinkS. (Ed.). (2012). Advances in visual methodology, London, England: Sage.
24.
ProsserJ. (2011). Visual methodology: Toward a more seeing research. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 479–495). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
SageJ., SmithD., & HubbardP. (2012). The diverse geographies of studentification: Living alongside people not like us. Housing Studies, 27, 1057–1078. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012. 728570
26.
SweetmanP. (2009). Revealing habitus, illuminating practice: Bourdieu, photography and visual methods. The Sociological Review, 57, 491–511. doi:10.1111/j.l467-954X.2009.01851.x
27.
WilesR., Bengry-HowellA., CrowG., & NindM. (2013). But is it innovation? The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research. Methodological Innovations, 8(1), 18–33. doi:10.4256/mio.2013.002
