In this article I describe data from my study about 11 family history genealogists and the objects they use to construct their ancestors as a Deleuzoguattarian assemblage, an entity that somehow functions together. In my study, I assembled object-interview data (Nordstrom 2013b), St. Pierre's (1997) dream and response data, weather data, spectral data (Nordstrom, 2013a), books written by participants, books recommended to me by participants, popular media about genealogy, my genealogy work, theories, and perhaps data—deconstructive data that problematize phenomenological certainty. Instead of thinking these data in discrete categories, the data functioned as lines that continuously moved and shifted together, thereby rendering the categories indistinguishable. The data assemblage is a dynamic onto-epistemological entity in which the constitutive lines open up new ideas of thinking about data in a study and what that data can do and become.
AldrichB. S. (1966). The rim of the prairie.Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1925)
2.
AldrichB. S. (1985). Spring came on forever.Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1935)
3.
BaughB. (2005). Experimentation. In ParrA. (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (pp. 91–93). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
4.
BishopR. (2008). In the grand scheme of things: An exploration of the meaning of genealogical research.The Journal of Popular Culture, 41, 393–411. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5931.2008.00527.x
5.
BogueR. (1989). Deleuze and Guattari.London, England: Routledge.
CatherW. (1989). Opioneers!New York, NY: Bantam Books. (Original work published 1913)
8.
CatherW. (1995). My Antonia.New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published 1918)
9.
ChamaretteJ. (2007). Flesh, folds and texturality: Thinking visual ellipsis via Merleau-Ponty, Hélène Cixous and Robert Frank.Paragraph, 30(2), 34–49. doi:10.3366/prg.2007.0018
10.
ChildersS. M. (2012). Against simplicity, against ethics: Analytics of disruption as quasimethodology.Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 752–761. doi:10.1177/1077800412453015
11.
ColebrookC. (2005). Introduction. In ParrA. (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (pp. 1–6). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
12.
DeleuzeG. (1990). The logic of sense (C. V. Boundas, Ed., M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
13.
DeleuzeG. (1991). The fold (J. Strauss, Trans.).Yale French Studies, 80, 227–247.
14.
DeleuzeG. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque (T. Conley, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
16.
DeleuzeG. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
17.
DeleuzeG. (2006). Two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 1975–1995 (LapoujadeD., Ed., A. Hodges & M. Taormina, Trans.). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
18.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20.
DeleuzeG., & ParnetC. (2002). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson, B. Habberjam, & E. R. Albert, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
21.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
DerridaJ. (1978). Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
DerridaJ. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning and the new international (P. Kamuf, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
DerridaJ. (1997). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
DuffW. M., & JohnsonC. A. (2003). Where is the list with all the names? Information-seeking behavior of genealogists.The American Archivist, 66, 79–95.
26.
FoucaultM. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (BouchardD. F., Ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
FoucaultM. (1988). Truth, power, self: An interview with Michel Foucault. In MartinL. H., GutmanH., & HuttonP. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Foucault (pp. 9–15). London, England: Tavistock.
28.
GatesH. L.Jr., GrantW. R., KunhardtP. W., & McGeeD. (Executive producers). (2010). Faces of America with Henry Louis Gates.New York, NY: WNET.ORG
29.
HackstaffK. B. (2009a). Who are we? Genealogists negotiating ethno-racial identities.Qualitative Sociology, 32, 173–194. doi:10.1007/s11133-009-9126-4
30.
HackstaffK. B. (2009b). “Turning points” for aging genealogists: Claiming identities and histories in time.Qualitative Sociology Review, 5(1), 130–151.
31.
HackstaffK. B. (2010). Family genealogy: A sociological imagination reveals intersectional relations.Sociology Compass, 4, 658–672. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00307,x
32.
HalewoodM. (2005). On Whitehead and Deleuze: The process of materiality.Configurations, 13, 57–76. doi:10.1353/con.2007.0009
33.
HarevanT. K. (1978). The search for generational memory: Tribal rites in industrial society.Daedalus, 107(4), 137–149.
34.
JacksonA. Y. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education26, 741–748. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788762
35.
Koro-LjungbergM., & MacLureM. (2013). Data [Special issue].Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 13(4).
36.
KudrowL. (Executive producer). (2010). Who do you think you are? New York, NY: NBC. Lambert, R. D. (1996). The family historian and temporal orientations towards the ancestral past.Journal of Time and Society, 5, 115–143. doi:10.1177/0961463X96005002001
37.
LambertR. D. (2002). Reclaiming the ancestral past: Narrative, rhetoric and the ‘convict stain.’Journal of Sociology, 38, 111–127. doi:10.1177/144078302128756534
38.
LambertR. D. (2003). Constructing symbolic ancestry: Befriending time, confronting death.Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 46, 303–321. doi:10.2190/EU0D-J1B0-JKJ0-GHMD
39.
MacLureM. (2012, May). Unholy mixtures: Language and materiality in qualitative methodology. Paper presented at the Eighth International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Urbana, IL.
40.
MacLureM. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 658–667. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
MayT. (1996). Gilles Deleuze and the politics of time.Man and World, 29, 293–304.
43.
MazzeiL. A. (2010). Thinking data with Deleuze.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 511–523. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.497176
44.
MazzeiL. A. (2013). . voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 732–740. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
45.
MazzeiL. A., & McCoyK. (2010). Thinking with Deleuze in qualitative research.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 503–509. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.500634
46.
NashC. (2002). Genealogical identities.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 27–52. doi:10.1068/d314
47.
NordstromS. N. (2013a). A conversation about spectral data.Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 13, 316–341. doi:10.1177/1532708613487879
48.
NordstromS. N. (2013b). Object-interviews: Folding, unfolding, and refolding perceptions of objects.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 237–257.
49.
NordstromS. N. (2015). Unifinished, fragmented, shifting, and folding slips toward the political possibilities of response data. In ReinerstenA. B., & OtterstadA. M. (Eds.), Metodefestival og øyeblikksrealisme - eksperimenterende kvalitative forskningspassasjer (pp. 200–213). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget
50.
ParhamA. A. (2008). Race, memory and family history.Social Identities, 14, 13–32. doi:10.1080/13504630701848465
SimondonG. (1992). The genesis of the individual. In CraryJ., & KwinterS. (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 297–319). New York, NY: Zone Books.
57.
SmolenyakM. (2009). Who do you think you are? The essential guide to tracing your family history: A companion to the NBC series.New York, NY: Viking.
58.
SpivakG. C. (1997). Translator's preface. In DerridaJ., Of grammatology (pp. ix–xc). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
59.
SteinJ. (2010, March 1). Reluctantly, Joel Stein discovers his roots.Time Magazine, 175(8), 64.
60.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175–189. doi:10.1080/095183997237278
61.
St. PierreE. A. (2001). Coming to theory: Finding Foucault and Deleuze. In WeilerK. (Ed.), Feminist engagements: Reading resisting and revisioning male theorists in education and cultural studies (pp. 141–163). New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
St. PierreE. A. (2007, April). Resisting “making meaning of silence.” Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
63.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
St. PierreE. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 646–657. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
65.
St. PierreE. A., & RichardsonL. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
SzucsL. D., & LuebkingS. H. (2006). The source: A guidebook to American genealogy (3rd ed.). Provo, UT: Ancestry.
67.
TaylorR. M.Jr. (1982). Summoning the wandering tribes: Genealogy and family reunions in American history.Journal of Social History, 16(2), 21–37.
68.
TuttonR. (2004). “They want to know where they came from”: Population genetics, identity, and family genealogy.New Genetics and Society, 23, 105–120. doi:10.1080/1463677042000189606
69.
TylerK. (2005). The genealogical imagination: The inheritance of interracial identities.The Sociological Review, S3, 476–494. doi:10.1111/j,1467-954X.2005.00562.x
