Troubling the Troublemakers: Three Challenges to Post-Qualitative Inquiry

Abstract

In recent years, a number of prominent scholars have criticized the current state of qualitative research and advocated a paradigm of post-qualitative inquiry (PQI). Incorporating insights from new materialism, PQI seeks to trouble what it calls conventional humanist qualitative methodology (CHQM). Although sympathetic to this overall project, the present article identifies and discusses three challenges in current PQI, namely the roles it ascribes to theory, to data, and to writing. It is argued that PQI risks succumbing to 1) theory-centrism, 2) researcher deletion, and 3) meta-reflexivity. By pinpointing these three challenges, the article hopes to nudge PQI one step further in its continuous theoretical “becoming.”

Keywords

meta-reflexivity new materialism post-qualitative inquiry researcher deletion theory-centrism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aagaard

(2017). Introducing Postphenomenological Research: A Brief and Selective Sketch of Phenomenological Research Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(6), 519-533.

Aagaard

(2019). Multitasking as Distraction: A Conceptual Analysis of Media Multitasking Research. Theory & Psychology, 29(1), 87-99.

Aagaard

Matthiesen

(2016). Methods of materiality: Participant observation and qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(1), 33-46.

Adams

Thompson

T. L.

(2016). Researching a posthuman world: Interviews with digital objects. Palgrave Macmillan.

Amatucci

K. B.

(2012). Writing “Teacher”. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5(2), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2012.5.2.271.

Austin

J.L.

(1962). Sense and sensibilia. Oxford University Press.

Barad

(2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801-831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.

Barad

(2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Biesta

(2016). Who's afraid of teaching? Heidegger and the question of education (‘Bildung'/‘Erziehung'). Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(8), 832-845. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1165017.

10.

Borchner

(2018). Unfurling rigor: On continuity and change in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(6), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727766.

11.

Brinkmann

(2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 720-725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530254.

12.

Charteris

Crinall

Etheredge

Honan

Koro-Ljungberg

(2020). Writing, haecceity, data, and maybe more. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 571-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419843558.

13.

Deleuze

Guattari

(1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

14.

Ellingson

L. L.

Sotirin

(2020). Data engagement: A critical materialist framework for making data in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 817-826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419846639.

15.

Gerrard

Rudolph

Sriprakash

(2017). The politics of post-qualitative inquiry: History and power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 384-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416672694.

16.

Gibson

J. J.

(1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

17.

Greene

J. C.

(2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788763.

18.

Gumbrecht

H. U.

(2006). 2. Presence achieved in language (with special attention given to the presence of the past). History and Theory, 45(3), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00367.x.

19.

Guttorm

H. E.

(2012). Becoming-(a)-paper, or an article undone. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(7), 595-605. https://orcid.org/10.1177/1077800412450157.

20.

Guttorm

H. E.

(2015). Assemblages and swing-arounds. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 353-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415615618.

21.

Haraway

(1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.

22.

Honan

Bright

(2016). Writing a thesis differently. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(5), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1145280.

23.

Jackson

A. Y.

(2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 741-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788762.

24.

Jackson

A. Y.

(2017). Thinking without method. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725355.

25.

Jackson

Mazzei

(2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203148037.

26.

Krause

S. R.

(2011). Bodies in action: Corporeal agency and democratic politics. Political Theory, 39(3), 299-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591711400025.

27.

Kuby

C. R.

(2017). Why a paradigm shift of 'more than human ontologies' is needed: putting to work poststructural and posthuman theories in writers' studio. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(9), 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1336803.

28.

Kuecker

(2020). Labors of reading in post qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 13(4), 540-554.

29.

Kuntz

A. M.

(2021). Standing at one's post: Post-qualitative inquiry as ethical enactment. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 215-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420932599.

30.

Lather

(1996). Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 525-546.

31.

Latour

(1988). The politics of explanation: An alternative. In Woolgar

(Ed), Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. Sage Publications.

32.

Latour

(1994). On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.

33.

Latour

(2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.

34.

Lenz Taguchi

(2013). Images of thinking in feminist materialisms: Ontological divergences and the production of researcher subjectivities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 706-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788759.

35.

Lester

J. N.

(2021). Relational engagements with post-qualitative inquiry: There are no blank pages. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 219-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420931133.

36.

MacLure

(2013). Researching without Representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755.

37.

MacLure

(2017). Qualitative methodology and the new materialisms: “A little of dionysus’s blood?”. In Denzin

Giardina

(Eds.), Qualitative Inquiry in Neoliberal Times (1st ed., pp. 204). Routledge.

38.

Mazzei

L. A.

(2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788761.

39.

Michael

(2004). On making data social: Heterogeneity in sociological practice. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104041105.

40.

Mol

(2008). I eat an apple. on theorizing subjectivities. Subjectivity, 22, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.2.

41.

Monforte

Smith

(2021). Conventional and Postqualitative Research: An Invitation to Dialogue. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(6), 650-660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420962469.

42.

Pedersen

(2013). Follow the judas sheep: Materializing post-qualitative methodology in zooethnographic space. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788760.

43.

Petersen

E. B.

(2018). ‘Data found us': A critique of some new materialist tropes in educational research. Research in Education, 101(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523718792161.

44.

Potter

Hepburn

(2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 281-307. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp045oa.

45.

Rautio

(2021). Post-qualitative inquiry: Four balancing acts in crafting alternative stories to live by. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 228-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420933297.

46.

Röhl

(2012). Disassembling the classroom - An ethnographic approach to the materiality of education. Ethnography and Education, 7(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2012.661591.

47.

Röhl

(2018). Inviting and Interacting: Postphenomenology and the Microsociology of Education. In Aagaard

Friis

Sorenson

Tafdrup

Hasse

(Eds.), Postphenomenological methodologies(p. 27-43). Lexington Books.

48.

Sørensen

(2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge University Press.

49.

Sørensen

(2013). Human presence: Towards a posthumanist approach to experience. Subjectivity, 6(1), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.31.

50.

St. Pierre

(2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In Denzin

Lincoln

(Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative inquiry (4^th ed.). Sage Publications.

51.

St. Pierre

E. A.

(2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487862.

52.

St. Pierre

(2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry”. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2-19. https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/521/stpierre.pdf.

53.

St. Pierre

E. A.

(2018). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417734567.

54.

Verbeek

P.P.

(2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State University Press.

55.

Wolgemuth

Marn

Barko

Weaver-Hightower

(2021). Radical uncertainty is not enough: (In)Justice matters of post-qualitative research. International Review of Qualitative Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447211012658.

56.

Woodward

(2020). Material methods: Researching and thinking with things. Sage Publications.