This article critically analyses the concept of space in generality and specifically the employment of safe space as an educational concept. In addition, by employing Derrida's notion of the arrivant, the article provides an account of the author's frustrations during his analysis of space and of his attempts to reorientate his quantitative writings to ones that are more autobiographical in nature. The argument emplaced in the article is that safe spaces are not safe but in reality are ‘warped spaces’ where landscapes reveal topographies of despair which mimic modern technological and capitalist development.
AgambenG. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AlgraK. (1994). Concepts of space in Greek thought.Leiden: Brill.
3.
AntonelliA. (2005). Grace under pressure. In Safe: Design takes on risk (pp. 8–15). New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
4.
ArmstrongF. (2003). Spaced out: Policy, difference and the challenge of inclusive education.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
5.
ArmstrongF. (2010). Disability, education, and space: Some critical reflections. In GulsonK. N., & SymesC. (Eds.), Spatial theories of education (pp. 95–110). Oxon: Taylor & Francis.
6.
Army Safety Program, Army Regulation 385-10 (2013).
7.
BachelardG. (1994). The poetics of space (M. Jolas, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
8.
BarrettB. J. (2010). Is ‘safety’ dangerous? A critical examination of the classroom as safe space.The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1). doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.9
9.
BettelheimB. (1967). The empty fortress: Infantile autism and the birth of the self.New York: Free Press.
10.
BoostromR. (1998). ‘Safe spaces’: Reflections on an educational metaphor.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30, 397–408. doi:10.1080/002202798183549
11.
BorgmannA. (2010). Orientation in technological space.First Monday, 15(6-7). doi:10.5210/fm.vl5i6.3037
12.
BryantW., TibbsA., & ClarkJ. (2011). Visualising a safe space: The perspective of people using mental health day services.Disability & Society, 26, 611–628. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.589194
13.
ButlerJ. (1995). For a careful reading. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser, Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 127–143). New York: Routledge.
14.
CaseyE. S. (1998). The fate of place: A philosophical history.Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
ColebrookC. (2008). Bourgeois thermodynamics. In BuchananI., & ThobornN. (Eds.), Deleuze and politics (pp. 121–138). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
16.
DeleuzeG. (2006). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque (T. Conley, Trans.). London: Continuum.
17.
DerridaJ. (1995). Points… interviews, 1974–1994 (E. Weber, Ed., P. Kamuf, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
EdwardsR., & UsherR. (2000). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity.London: Routledge.
19.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.
20.
FoucaultM. (2001). Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, Volume 3 (FaubionJ. D., Ed.). London: New Press.
21.
GaschéR. (1986). The tain of the mirror: Derrida and the philosophy of reflection.London: Harvard University Press.
22.
GolbergD. T. (2000). Heterogeneity and hybridity: Colonial legacy, postcolonial heresy. In SchwarzH., & RayS. (Eds.), A companion to postcolonial studies (pp. 72–86). London: Blackwell.
23.
HardenJ. (2000). There's no place like home: The public/private distinction in children's theorizing of risk and safety.Childhood, 7, 43–59. doi:10.1177/0907568200007001005
24.
HeideggerM. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). London: SCM Press.
25.
HodkinsonA. (2012). All present and correct?’ Exclusionary inclusion within the English educational system.Disability & Society, 27, 675–688. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.673078
26.
HodkinsonA. (2013). Colonization, disability, and the intranet: The ethnic cleansing of space?Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 461–469. doi:10.1177/1077800413482100
27.
HunterM. A. (2008). Cultivating the art of safe space.Research in Drama Education, 13, 5–21. doi:10.1080/13569780701825195
28.
JammerM. (1954). Concepts of space: The history of theories of space in physics.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
KaplinN, & MoulthropS. (1994). Where no mind has gone before: Ontological design for virtual spaces. In Proceedings of ECHT ‘94 the ACM European Conference on Hypermedia Technology (pp. 206–216).
KrellD. F. (1992). Daimon life: Heidegger and life-philosophy.London: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)
34.
LempertL. B., LaRoseC., FreemanL., & LissL. (2012). ‘What is it that these people want? Are we part of some kind of experiment?’: Mentoring in a women's prison.Humanity & Society, 36, 30–49. doi:10.1177/0160597611433272
35.
LinvilleD. (2009). Queer theory and teen sexuality: Unclear lines. In AnyonJ. (Ed.), Theory and educational research: Toward critical social explanation (pp. 153–174). New York: Routledge.
Pavlov-WestR. (2009). Space in theory: Kristeva, Foucault, Deleuze.Amsterdam: Rodopi.
39.
PeimN. (2001). The history of the present: Towards a contemporary phenomenology of the school.History of Education, 30, 177–190. doi:10.1080/00467600010012454
40.
PellingM., HighC., DearingJ., & SmithD. (2008). Shadow spaces for social learning: A relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations.Environment and Planning A, 40, 867–884. doi:10.1068/a39148
41.
PetersM. A., & KesslF. (2000). Space, time, history: The reassertion of space in social theory.Policy Futures in Education, 7, 20–30. doi:10.2304/pfie.2009.7.1.20
42.
RämöH. (2004). Moments of trust: Temporal and spatial factors of trust in organizations.Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 760–775.
43.
RancièreJ. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible (G. Rockhill, Trans.). London: Continuum.
44.
RickertT. J. (2007). Toward the chōra: Kristeva, Derrida, and Ulmer on emplaced invention.Philosophy and Rhetoric, 40, 251–273. doi:10.1353/par.2007.0030
SallisJ. (2004). Platonic legacies.Albany: State University of New York Press.
47.
SiegelE. (1946, December). The philosophy of stuttering.Aesthetic Realism Foundation. Lecture given at Steinway Hall. Retrieved from http://www.aestheticrealism.org/tro1751.html
48.
StronachI. (2012). (B)othering education: An autobiography of alternatives.Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 1(1), 171–174.
49.
SullivanD. J. (1991). Leadership and taking care of soldiers. What does it mean?Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.
ThomsonP. (2007). Working the in/visible geographies of school exclusion. In GulsonK. N., & SymesC. (Eds.), Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matters (pp. 111–130). London: Taylor & Francis.
52.
TuanY.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience.Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
53.
VidlerA. (2000). Warped space: Art, architecture, and anxiety in modern culture.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
WinterC. (2009). Places, spaces, holes for knowing and writing the Earth: The geography curriculum and Derrida's Khôra.Ethics and Education, 4, 57–68. doi:10.1080/17449640902816376
55.
YamashitaH. (2004). Humanitarian space and international politics: The creation of safe areas.Aldershot: Ashgate.
56.
YelavichS. (2005). Safety nests. In Safe: Design Takes on Risk (pp. 16–25). New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
57.
ŽiŽekS. (2009). In defense of lost causes.London: Verso.
