The aim of this study is to investigate the medicalising of gambling problems by comparing the political discussions on gambling in the Swedish Parliament in the early 1970s and the early 2010s.
Design
Against a theoretical background on medicalising processes in general, and medicalisation of gambling problems in particular, we have analysed discussion protocols and parliamentary bills in the Swedish Parliament from the years 1970–1975 and 2012–2013.
Results
The problem descriptions of the 1970s and 2010s are, in certain respects, strikingly similar, identifying proactive operators such as the gambling companies and highlighting an inadequate legal framework. But where the MPs of the 1970s put some effort into describing the drab society which fed the need for gambling, the elected representatives of the 2010s shortcut to individual dependence.
Conclusions
EU membership and the development of the Internet have made effective control and regulation impossible in the early 2010s and the political handling of the Swedish gambling problem is therefore a clear example of how market liberalisation can pave the way for individualisation, medicalisation and depoliticisation of social problems.
BerridgeV. (1997). Two tales of addiction – Opium and nicotine.Human Psychopharmacology, 12, S45–S52.
7.
BindeP. (2005a). Att sälja en dröm – om spelreklam och dess påverkan.Stockholm: Statens folkhälsoinstitut.
8.
BindeP. (2005b). Gambling across cultures: Mapping worldwide occurrence and learning from ethnographic comparison.International Gambling Studies,5(1), 1–27.
9.
BindeP. (2005c). Gambling, exchange systems, and moralities.Journal of Gambling Studies,21(4), 445–479.
10.
BindeP. (2007). Spelreklam och spelberoende: en intervjustudie.Stockholm: Statens folkhälsoinstitut.
11.
BindeP. (2013a). Gambling in Sweden: The cultural and socio-political context.Addiction,109(2), 193–198.
12.
BindeP. (2013b). “Spelberoende” och relaterade begrepp: vad betyder de egentligen?Lotteriinspektionens skriftserie, 4, 19–38.
13.
BonnaireC., BungenerC., & VaresconI. (2006). Pathological gambling and sensation seeking – How do gamblers playing games of chance in cafés differ from those who bet on horses at the racetrack?Addiction Research and Theory, 14(6), 619–629.
14.
BorchA. (2012). Perceptions of gambling in households – A case study from Norway.Addiction Research and Theory, 20(4), 317–328.
15.
BorchA. (2015). Problem gambling – A Lacanian Real.International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research,4(1), 71–76. doi: 10.7895/ijadr.vXiY.197
16.
BoudreauA., LabrieR., & ShafferH. J. (2009. Towards DSM-V: “Shadow Syndrome” symptom patterns among pathological gamblers.Addiction Research and Theory,17(4), 406–419.
17.
CampbellN. (2011). Metapharmacology of the addicted brain.History of the Present, 1(2), 194–218.
18.
CantinottiM., LadouceurR., & JaquesC. (2009). Lay and scientific conceptualizations of impaired control at electronic gambling machines.Addiction Research and Theory, 17(6), 650–667.
19.
CastellaniB. (2000). Pathological gambling: The making of a medical problem.Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
ChristieN., & BruunK. (1969). Alcohol problems: The conceptual framework. In KellerM., & CoffeyT. G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th international congress on alcohol and alcoholism. Vol. 2 (pp. 65–73). Highland Park.
21.
Cisneros ÖrnbergJ., & TammiT. (2011). Gambling problems as a political framing – Safeguarding the monopolies in Finland and Sweden.Journal of Gambling Issues, 26, 110–125.
22.
CohenP. (2000). Is the addiction doctor the voodoo priest of western man?Addiction Research, 8(6), 589–598.
23.
CohenS. A., HighamJ. E. S., & CavaliereC. T. (2011). Binge flying: Behavioural addiction and climate change.Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1070–1089.
24.
CollinsA. (1996). The pathological gambler and the government of gambling.History of the Human Sciences, 9(3), 69–100.
25.
CourtwrightD. (2010). The NIDA brain disease paradigm.BioSocieties, 5(1), 137–147.
26.
CusterR., & MiltH. (1985). When luck runs out: Help for compulsive gamblers and their families.New York: Facts on File.
27.
da Silva LoboD. S. (2007). Dopamine genes and pathological gambling in discordant sib-pairs.Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(4), 421–433.
28.
DaviesJ. B. (1997). The myth of addiction.Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
29.
De GeerH. (2011). Statens spel. Penninglotteriet, Tipstjänst, Svenska Spel.Stockholm: Atlantis.
30.
EconomopoulosA. (2006). Opposing the lottery in the United States: Forces behind individual attitudes towards legalisation in 1975.International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 267–291.
31.
EdmanJ. (2009). What's in a name? Alcohol and drug treatment and the politics of confusion.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 26(4), 339–353.
32.
EdmanJ. (2012). Swedish drug treatment and the political use of conceptual innovation 1882–1982.Contemporary Drug Problems, 29(3), 429–460.
33.
EdmanJ. (2013a). An all-embracing problem description: The Swedish drug issue as a political catalyst 1982–2000.International Journal of Drug Policy,24(6), 558–565.
34.
EdmanJ. (2013b). An ambiguous monolith – The Swedish drug issue as a political battleground 1965–1981.International Journal of Drug Policy,24(5), 464–470.
35.
EdmanJ. (2015). Temperance and modernity: Alcohol consumption as a collective problem 1885–1913.Journal of Social History,49(1), 20–52. doi: 10.1093/jsh/shv029
36.
EdmanJ., & OlssonB. (2014). The Swedish drug problem: Conceptual understanding and problem handling, 1839–2011.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 31(5-6), 503–526.
37.
EdmanJ., & SteniusK. (2014). Conceptual carpentry as problem handling: The case of drugs and coercive treatment in social democratic welfare regimes.International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(2), 320–328.
38.
EgererM. D., & MarionneauV. (2015). And that is where the fun ends – General practitioners' conceptualisation of the line between recreational and problem gambling.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 32(1), 31–47.
39.
EngelsF. (1887 [1845]). The condition of the working class in England.New York: J.W. Lovell Co.
40.
FosterA. C., ShorterG. W., & GriffithsM. D. (2015). Muscle dysmorphia: Could it be classified as an addiction to body image?Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(1), 1–5.
41.
FoxR., & OrfordJ. (2004). A qualitative study of the meaning of exercise for people who could be labelled as “addicted” to exercise – Can “addiction” be applied to high frequency exercising?Addiction Research and Theory, 12(2), 167–188.
42.
FranceC. J. (1902). The gambling impulse.The American Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 364–407.
43.
FrykmanJ. (1988). Dansbaneeländet: ungdomen, populärkulturen och opinionen.Stockholm: Natur & kultur.
44.
García-GarcíaI., HorstmannA., JuradoM. A., GaroleraM., ChaudhryS. J., MarguliesD. S., VillringerA., & NeumannJ. (2014). Reward processing in obesity, substance addiction and non-substance addiction.Obesity Reviews, 15(11), 1–17.
45.
GebauerL., LaBrieR., & ShafferH. J. (2010). Optimizing DSM-IV-TR classification accuracy: A brief biosocial screen for detecting current gambling disorders among gamblers in the general household population.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(2), 82–90.
46.
Grall-Bronnec (2015). Fortune telling addiction: Unfortunately a serious topic.Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(1), 27–31.
47.
GriffithsM. (2005). Workaholism is still a useful construct.Addiction Research and Theory, 13(2), 97–100.
48.
GriffithsM., WardleH., OrfordJ., SprostonK., & ErensB. (2010). Gambling, alcohol, consumption, cigarette smoking and health: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey.Addiction Research and Theory;18(2), 208–223.
49.
GustavssonA., & SvanellA. (2012). Spela lagom! Hur drömmen om snabba pengar gjorde Sverige spelberoende.Stockholm: Natur & kultur.
50.
HansenM., & RossowI. (2008). Adolescent gambling and problem gambling: Does the total consumption model apply?Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(2), 135–149.
51.
HellmanM., SchoenmakersT. M., NordstromB. R., & van HolstR. J. (2013). Is there such a thing as online video game addiction? A cross-disciplinary review.Addiction Research and Theory, 21(2), 102–112.
52.
HoltgravesT. (2009). Evaluating the Problem Gambling Severity Index.Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(1), 105–120.
53.
HuszO. (2004). Drömmars värde: varuhus och lotteri i svensk konsumtionskultur 1897–1939.Hedemora: Gidlund.
54.
IhrforsR. (2007). Spelfrossa: spelets makt och maktens spel.Stockholm: Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
55.
IngheG. (1960). Fattiga i folkhemmet: en studie av långvarigt understödda i Stockholm.Stockholm: Stadsarkivet.
56.
IngheG., & IngheM.-B. (1967). Den ofärdiga välfärden.Stockholm: Tiden/Folksam.
57.
JacobsD. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model.Journal of Gambling Behaviour, 2(1), 15–31.
58.
KaplanR. (1996). Carrot addiction.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 30(5), 698–700.
59.
Kautilya (1923). Arthaśastra.Mysore.
60.
KhairkarP., TipleP., & BangG. (2009). Cow dung ingestion and inhalation dependence: A case report.International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(3), 488–491.
61.
KeaneH. (2002). What's wrong with addiction?Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
62.
KingmaS. (2004). Gambling and the risk society: The liberalisation and legitimation crisis of gambling in the Netherlands.International Gambling Studies, 4(1), 47–67.
63.
KingmaS. (2008). The liberalization and (re)regulation of Dutch gambling markets: National consequences of the changing European context.Regulation & Governance, 2(4), 445–458.
64.
LesieurH., & RosenthalR. (1991). Pathological gambling: A review of the literature.Journal of Gambling Studies, 7(1), 5–39.
65.
LundI. (2008). The population mean and the proportion of frequent gamblers: Is the theory of total consumption valid for gambling?Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(2), 247–256.
66.
MarkhamF., & YoungM. (2015). “Big gambling”: The rise of the global industry-state gambling complex.Addiction Research and Theory, 23(1), 1–4.
67.
MarksI. (1990). Behavioural (non-chemical) addictions.British Journal of Addiction, 85(11), 1389–1394.
McmillenJ., & WenzelM. (2006). Measuring problem gambling: Assessment of three prevalence screens.International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 147–174.
70.
MercerK. B., & EastwoodJ. D. (2010). Is boredom associated with problem gambling behaviour? It depends on what you mean by “boredom”.International Gambling Studies, 10(1), 91–104.
71.
Müller-SpahnF., & MargrafJ. (2003). Wenn Spielen pathologisch wird.Basel: Karger.
72.
NorbergJ. (2004). Idrottens väg till folkhemmet: studier i statlig idrottspolitik 1913–1970.Stockholm: SISU idrottsböcker.
73.
OrfordJ. (2011). An unsafe bet? The dangerous rise of gambling and the debate we should be having.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
74.
PallantiS., DeCariaC. M., GrantJ. E., UrpeM., & HollanderE. (2005). Reliability and validity of the pathological gambling adaptation of the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (PG-YBOCS).Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 431–443.
75.
PB [Parliamentary Bill] 1970–1975/76; 2012/13.
76.
PR [Parliamentary Record] 1970–1975/76; 2012/13.
77.
RantalaV., & SulkunenP. (2012). Is pathological gambling just a big problem or also an addiction?Addiction Research and Theory, 20(1), 1–10.
78.
RayluN., & OeiT. P. S. (2004). The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): Development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties.Addiction, 99(6), 757–769.
79.
ReithG. (1999). The age of chance: Gambling in the western culture.London: Routledge.
80.
ReithG. (2007). Gambling and the contradictions of consumption: A genealogy of the “pathological” subject.American Behavioral Scientist, 51(1), 33–55.
81.
ReithG., & DobbieF. (2012). Lost in the game: Narratives of addiction and identity in recovery from problem gambling.Addiction Research and Theory, 20(6), 511–521.
82.
RoseI. N. (1988). Compulsive gambling and the law: From sin to vice to disease.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4(4), 240–260.
83.
RosecranceJ. (1985). Compulsive gambling and the medicalization of deviance.Social Problems, 32(3), 275–284.
84.
SchiebenerJ., LaierC., & BrandM. (2015). Getting stuck with pornography? Overuse or neglect of cybersex cues in a multitasking situation is related to symptoms of cybersex addiction.Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(1), 14–21.
85.
ScottS. (2006). The medicalisation of shyness: From social misfits to social fitness.Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(2), 133–153.
86.
ShafferH. J., StantonM. V., & NelsonS. E. (2006). Trends in gambling studies research: Quantifying, categorizing, and describing citations.Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(4), 427–442.
87.
SmithD. P., PolsR. G., BattersbyM. W., & HarveyP. W. (2013). The Gambling Urge Scale: Reliability and validity in a clinical population.Addiction Research and Theory, 21(2), 113–122.
88.
SpencerD. J. (2009). The oil dependence syndrome.Addiction Research and Theory, 17(4), 446–449.
89.
SGOR [Swedish Government Official Report] 2000:50. Från tombola till Internet – översyn av lotterilagstiftningen.Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
90.
SGOR2006:11. Spel i en föränderlig värld: slutbetänkande.Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
91.
SGOR2008:124. En framtida spelreglering: slutbetänkande.Stockholm: Fritze.
92.
SGOR2011:35. Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende: individen, kunskapen och ansvaret.Stockholm: Fritze.
93.
SSB [Swedish Statute Bok]1962–1999.
94.
SvenaeusF. (2013). Homo Patologicus: medicinska diagnoser i vår tid.Hägersten: Tankekraft.
95.
TaylorC. Z. (2002). Religious addiction: Obsession with spirituality.Pastoral Psychology, 50(4), 291–315.
Toce-GersteinM., GersteinD. R., & VolbergR. A. (2009). The NODS–CLiP: A rapid screen for adult pathological and problem gambling.Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(4), 541–555.
98.
VolbergR. A., & WrayM. (2007). Legal gambling and problem gambling as mechanisms of social domination? Some considerations for future research.American Behavioral Scientist, 51(1), 56–85.
99.
VreckoS. (2010). Birth of a brain disease.History of the Human Sciences, 23(4), 52–67.
100.
WessbergG. (2012). Om spel i svensk lagstiftning fram till år 1900.Lotteriinspektionens skriftserie, 1, 12–21.
101.
WohlM. J. A., StewartM. J., & YoungM. M. (2011). Personal Luck Usage Scale (PLUS): Psychometric validation of a measure of gambling-related belief in luck as a personal possession.International Gambling Studies, 11(1), 7–21.
102.
WuA. M., & TangC. S. (2011). Validation of the Chinese version of the gambling motivation scale (C-GMS).Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 709–724.
103.
YeY., GaoW., WangY., & LuoJ. (2012). Comparison of the addiction levels, sociodemographics and buying behaviours of three main types of lottery buyers in China.Addiction Research and Theory, 20(4), 307–316.
104.
YoungM. (2013). Statistics, scapegoats and social control: A critique of pathological gambling prevalence research.Addiction Research and Theory, 21(1), 1–11.
105.
YoungM. M., & WohlM. J. A. (2011). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: An evaluation of the scale and its accompanying profiler software in a clinical setting.Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(3), 467–485.
