While a time-based segmentation approach to customer segmentation for new products allows firms to identify consumers in the innovator and early adopter segments, this study adds a profitability-based perspective to generate new insights. Using six years of data on the adoption of technology services over three generations from a large technology manufacturer–service provider across seven countries, the authors provide empirical evidence that the short-term and long-term profitability per period of clients in the early majority segment is the highest, followed by the late majority, the innovators, the early adopters, and the laggards, respectively. While a time-based segmentation approach enables firms to identify consumers who are likely to adopt new products sooner than others, a profitability-based perspective can complement their targeting strategy and enhance overall profits. Managers can make informed decisions on investments required to develop new markets with better estimates of the profitability of consumers from later segments. Our study offers managers the necessary insights to develop a road map for identifying and targeting the most profitable clients.
AndersonErin W., FornellClaes, and LehmannDonald R. (1994), “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 53–66.
2.
BassFrank M. (1969), “A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables,”Management Science, 15 (5), 215–27.
3.
BoerHarry, and GertsenFrank (2003), “From Continuous Improvement to Continuous Innovation: A (Retro)(Per)spective,”International Journal of Technology Management, 26 (8), 805–27.
4.
BoltonRuth N., and LemonKatherine N. (1999), “A Dynamic Model of Customers’ Usage of Services: Usage as an Antecedent and Consequence of Satisfaction,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 171–86.
5.
BouldingWilliam, KalraAjay, StaelinRichard, and ZeithamlValarie A. (1993), “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (1), 7–27.
6.
DekimpeMarnik G., ParkerPhilip M., and SarvaryMiklos (2000), “Global Diffusion of Technological Innovations: A Coupled-Hazard Approach,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (1), 47–59.
7.
DesirajuRamarao, NairHarikesh, and ChintaguntaPradeep K. (2004), “Diffusion of New Pharmaceutical Drugs in Developing and Developed Nations,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (4), 341–57.
8.
FrattiniFederico, BianchiMattia, De MassisAlfredo, and SikimicUros (2013), “The Role of Early Adopters in the Diffusion of New Products: Differences Between Platform and Non-Platform Innovations,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31 (3), 466–88.
9.
GaneshJaishankar, KumarV., and SubramaniamVelavan (1997), “Learning Effect in Multinational Diffusion of Consumer Durables: An Exploratory Investigation,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (3), 214–28.
10.
GoldenbergJacob, and OregShaul (2007), “Laggards in Disguise: Resistance to Adopt and the Leapfrogging Effect,”Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74 (8), 1272–81.
11.
GolderPeter N., and TellisGerard J. (1997), “Will It Ever Fly? Modeling the Takeoff of Really New Consumer Durables,”Marketing Science, 16 (3), 256–70.
12.
GoldsmithRonald, and FlynnLeisa Reinecke (1992), “Identifying Innovators in Consumer Product Markets,”European Journal of Marketing, 26 (12), 42–55.
13.
GuptaSachin, JainDipak C., and SawhneyMohanbir S. (1999), “Modeling the Evolution of Markets with Indirect Network Externalities: Application to Digital Television,”Marketing Science, 18 (3), 396–416.
14.
HeideJan B., and WeissAllen M. (1995), “Vendor Consideration and Switching Behavior for Buyers in High-Technology Markets,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (3), 30–43.
15.
KalishShlomo, MahajanVijay, and MullerEitan (1995), “Waterfall and Sprinkler New-Product Strategies in Competitive Global Markets,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12 (2), 105–19.
16.
KauffmanRobert, and TechatassanasoontornAngsana (2005), “International Diffusion of Digital Mobile Technology: A Coupled-Hazard State-Based Approach,”Information Technology and Management, 6 (2/3), 253–92.
17.
KrishnanTrichy V., BassFrank M., and KumarV. (2000), “Impact of a Late Entrant on the Diffusion of a New Product/Service,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 269–78.
KumarV., and KrishnanTrichy V. (2002), “Multinational Diffusion Models: A New Framework,”Marketing Science, 21 (3), 318–30.
20.
KumarV., PetersenJ. Andrew, and LeoneRobert P. (2013), “Defining, Measuring, and Managing Business Reference Value,”Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 68–86.
21.
KumarV., ShahDenish (2009), “Expanding the Role of Marketing: From Customer Equity to Market Capitalization,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (6), 119–36.
22.
MaZhenfeng, YangZ., and MouraliMehdi (2014), “Consumer Adoption of New Products: Independent Versus Interdependent Self-Perspectives,”Journal of Marketing, 78 (2), 101–17.
23.
MahajanVijay, and MullerEitan (1996), “Timing, Diffusion, and Substitution of Successive Generations of Technological Innovations: The IBM Mainframe Case,”Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 51 (2), 109–32.
24.
MahajanVijay, MullerEitan, and SrivastavaRajendra K. (1990), “Determination of Adopter Categories Using Innovation Diffusion Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1), 37–50.
25.
NejadMohammad G., SherrellDaniel L., and BabakusEmin (2014), “Influentials and Influence Mechanisms in New Product Diffusion: An Integrative Review,”Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22 (2), 185–208.
26.
NortonJohn A., and BassFrank M. (1987), “A Diffusion Theory Model of Adoption and Substitution for Successive Generations of High-Technology Products,”Management Science, 33 (September), 1069–86.
27.
PeresRenana, MullerEitan, and MahajanVijay (2010), “Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models: A Critical Review and Research Directions,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (2), 91–106.
28.
PrinsRemco, VerhoefPeter C., and FransesPhilip Hans (2009), “The Impact of Adoption Timing on New Service Usage and Early Disadoption,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26 (4), 304–13.
29.
RamS., and JungHyung-Shik (1994), “Innovativeness in Product Usage: A Comparison of Early Adopters and Early Majority,”Psychology and Marketing, 11 (1), 57–67.
30.
RisseladaHans, VerhoefPeter C., and BijmoltTammo H.A. (2014), “Dynamic Effects of Social Influence and Direct Marketing on the Adoption of High-Technology Products,”Journal of Marketing, 78 (2), 52–68.
31.
RogersEverett M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
32.
RogersEverett M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed.New York: The Free Press.
33.
RosenEmanuel (2002), The Anatomy of Buzz: How to Create Word of Mouth Marketing. New York: Doubleday.
34.
SoodAshish, JamesGareth, and TellisGerard J. (2009), “Functional Regression: A New Model for Predicting Market Penetration of New Products,”Marketing Science, 28, 36–51.
35.
SoodAshish, JamesGareth, TellisGerard J., and ZhuJi (2012), “Predicting the Path of Technological Innovation: SAW vs. Moore, Bass, Gompertz, and Kryder,”Marketing Science, 31 (6), 964–79.
36.
SoodAshish, and TellisGerard J. (2005), “Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), 152–68.
37.
SoodAshish, and TellisGerard J. (2009), “Do Innovations Really Pay Off? Total Stock Market Returns to Innovation,”Marketing Science, 28 (3), 442–56.
38.
SrinivasanRaji, LilienGary L., and RangaswamyArvind (2004), “First In, First Out? The Effects of Network Externalities on Pioneer Survival,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 41–55.
39.
SrivastavaRajendra K., ShervaniTasadduq A., and FaheyLiam (1998), “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 62 (1), 2–18.
40.
StremerschStefan, MullerEitan, and PeresRenana (2010), “Does New Product Growth Accelerate Across Technology Generations?”Marketing Letters, 21 (2), 103–20.
41.
StremerschStefan, and TellisGerard J. (2004), “Managing International Growth of New Products,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (4), 421–38.
42.
SultanFareena, FarleyJohn H., and LehmannDonald R. (1990), “A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1), 70–77.
43.
TalukdarDebabrata, SudhirK., and AinslieAndrew (2002), “Investigating New Product Diffusion Across Products and Countries,”Marketing Science, 21 (1), 97–116.
44.
TellefsenThomas, and TakadaHirokazu (1999), “The Relationship Between Mass Media Availability and the Multicountry Diffusion of Consumer Products,”Journal of International Marketing, 7 (1), 77–96.
45.
TukeyJohn W. (1953), “The Problem of Multiple Comparisons,” unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
46.
TrusovMichael, BucklinRandolph E., and PauwelsKoen (2009), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 90–102.
47.
Van den BulteChristophe (2000), “New Product Diffusion Acceleration: Measurement and Analysis,”Marketing Science, 19 (4), 366–80.
48.
Van den BulteChristophe, and StremerschStefan (2004), “Social Contagion and Income Heterogeneity in New Product Diffusion: A Meta-Analytic Test,”Marketing Science, 23 (4), 530–44.
49.
Van EverdingenYvonne, FokDennis, and StremerschStefan (2009), “Modeling Global Spillover of New Product Takeoff,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (5), 637–52.
50.
VenkatesanRajkumar, and KumarV. (2004), “A Customer Lifetime Value Framework for Customer Selection and Resource Allocation Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 106–25.
51.
VillanuevaJulian, YooShijin, and HanssensDominique M. (2008), “The Impact of Marketing-Induced Versus Word-of-Mouth Customer Acquisition on Customer Equity Growth,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (1), 48–59.
52.
ZhangXiaoling, LiShibo, BurkeRaymond R., and LeykinAlex (2014), “An Examination of Social Influence on Shopper Behavior Using Video Tracking Data,”Journal of Marketing, 78 (5), 24–41.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
