In responding to customer questions or complaints, should marketing agents linguistically “put the customer first” by using certain personal pronouns? Customer orientation theory, managerial literature, and surveys of managers, customer service representatives, and consumers suggest that firm agents should emphasize how “we” (the firm) serve “you” (the customer), while de-emphasizing “I” (the agent) in these customer–firm interactions. The authors find evidence of this language pattern in use at over 40 firms. However, they theorize and demonstrate that these personal pronoun emphases are often suboptimal. Five studies using lab experiments and field data reveal that firm agents who refer to themselves using “I” rather than “we” pronouns increase customers’ perceptions that the agent feels and acts on their behalf. In turn, these positive perceptions of empathy and agency lead to increased customer satisfaction, purchase intentions, and purchase behavior. Furthermore, the authors find that customer-referencing “you” pronouns have little impact on these outcomes and can sometimes have negative consequences. These findings enhance understanding of how, when, and why language use affects social perception and behavior and provide valuable insights for marketers.
AhearnLaura M. (2001), “Language and Agency,”Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–37.
2.
AkitsukiYuko, and DecetyJean (2009), “Social Context and Perceived Agency Affects Empathy for Pain: An Event-Related fMRI Investigation,”NeuroImage, 47 (2), 722–34.
3.
AustinJohn L. (1975), How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BaraschAlixandra, and BergerJonah (2014), “Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share,”Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (3), 286–99.
6.
BoltonRuth N., and DrewJames H. (1991), “A Multi-Stage Model of Customer's Assessments of Service Quality and Value,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 375–84.
7.
BradyMichael K., and CroninJ. Joseph (2001), “Customer Orientation Effects on Customer Service Perceptions and Outcome Behaviors,”Journal of Service Research, 3 (3), 241–51.
8.
BullockJohn G., GreenDonald P., and HaShang E. (2010), “Yes, but What's the Mechanism? (Don't Expect an Easy Answer),”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (4), 550–58.
9.
BurnkrantRobert E., and UnnavaH. Rao (1995), “Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (1), 17–26.
10.
ChanElaine, and SenguptaJaideep (2010), “Insincere flattery actually works: A dual attitudes perspective,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (1), 122–33.
ChenZoey, and LurieNicholas H. (2013), “Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word-of-Mouth,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (4), 1–51.
13.
ChungCindy, and PennebakerJames W. (2007), “The Psychological Functions of Function Words,”Social CommunicationFiedlerK., ed. Chicago, IL: Psychology Press.
14.
CollinsAllan M., and LoftusElizabeth F. (1975), “A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing,”Psychological Review, 82 (6), 407–28.
15.
DavisMark H. (1994), Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
16.
DuncanTom, and MoriartySandra E. (1998), “A Communication-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), 1–13.
EscalasJennifer Edson (2007), “Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation Versus Analytical Elaboration,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (4), 421–29.
19.
FahnestockJeanne (2011), Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
FitzsimonsGráinne M., and KayAaron C. (2004), “Language and Interpersonal Cognition: Causal Effects of Variations in Pronoun Usage on Perceptions of Closeness,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (5), 547–57.
21.
FrijdaNico H., KuipersPeter, and Ter SchureElisabeth (1989), “Relations Among Emotion, Appraisal, and Emotional Action Readiness,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (2), 212–28.
22.
GoffmanErving (1981), Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23.
GordonPeter C., GroszBarbara J., and GilliomLaura A. (1993), “Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse,”Cognitive Science, 17 (3), 311–47.
24.
GreenwaldAnthony G. (1975), “Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis,”Psychological Bulletin, 82 (1), 1–20.
25.
GricePaul (1991), Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
HallidayM.A.K. (1985), Spoken and Written Language. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
27.
HamiltonRebecca W., SchlosserAnn, and ChenYu-Jen (2017), “Who's Driving This Conversation? Systematic Biases in the Content of Online Consumer Discussions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (5), 540–55.
HomburgChristian, HoyerWayne D., and FassnachtMartin (2002), “Service Orientation of a Retailer's Business Strategy: Dimensions, Antecedents, and Performance Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (4), 86–101.
31.
IckesWilliam, ReidheadSusan, and PattersonMiles (1986), “Machiavellianism and Self-Monitoring: As Different as ‘Me’ and ‘You’,”Social Cognition, 4 (1), 58–74.
32.
IckesWilliam, StinsonLinda, BissonnetteVictor, and GarciaStella (1990), “Naturalistic Social Cognition: Empathic Accuracy in Mixed-Sex Dyads,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (4), 730–42.
33.
Inigo-MoraIsabel (2004), “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities,”Journal of Language and Politics, 3 (1), 27–52.
34.
Johnson-LairdP.N. (1968), “The Interpretation of the Passive Voice,”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(1), 69–73.
35.
KashimaEmiko S., and KashimaYoshihisa (1998), “Culture and Language: The Case of Cultural Dimensions and Personal Pronoun Use,”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29 (3), 461–86.
36.
KassRobert E., and RafteryAdrian E. (1995), “Bayes Factors,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90 (430), 773–95.
37.
KatzJerrold J. (1989), Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
KirmaniAmna, and ZhuRui (Juliet) (2007), “Vigilant Against Manipulation: The Effect of Regulatory Focus on the Use of Persuasion Knowledge,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (4), 688–701.
39.
KogutTehila, and RitovIlana (2005), “The ‘Identified Victim’ Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual?”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18 (3), 157–67.
40.
KronrodAnn, GrinsteinAmir, and WathieuLuc (2011), “Enjoy! Hedonic Consumption and Compliance with Assertive Messages,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (1), 51–61.
KwakSonya S., KimYunkyung, KimEunho, ShinChristine, and ChoKwangsu (2013), “What Makes People Empathize with an Emotional Robot?: The Impact of Agency and Physical Embodiment on Human Empathy for a Robot,” in proceedings of RO-MAN, 2013 IEEE, 180–85.
43.
ManchandaPuneet, PackardGrant, and PattabhiramaiahAdithya (2013), “Social Dollars: The Economic Impact of Customer Participation in a Firm-Sponsored Online Customer Community,”Marketing Science, 34 (3), 367–87.
44.
MarinovaDetelina, YeJun, and SinghJagdip (2008), “Do Frontline Mechanisms Matter? Impact of Quality and Productivity Orientations on Unit Revenue, Efficiency, and Customer Satisfaction,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (2), 28–45.
45.
MaxhamJames G.III, and NetemeyerRichard G. (2002), “A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Customers’ Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (4), 57–71.
46.
Meyers-LevyJoan, and PeracchioLaura (1996), “Moderators of the Impact of Self-Reference on Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (4), 408–23.
47.
MooreSarah G. (2012), “Some Things Are Better Left Unsaid: How Word of Mouth Influences the Storyteller,”Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (6), 1140–54.
48.
MooreSarah G. (2015), “Attitude Predictability and Helpfulness in Online Reviews: The Role of Explained Actions and Reactions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (1), 30–44.
49.
MooreSarah G., and McFerranBrent (2017), “She Said, She Said: Linguistic Mimicry in Online Word of Mouth,”Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (2), 229–45.
50.
PackardGrant, and BergerJonah (2017), “How Language Shapes Word of Mouth's Impact,”Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (4), 572–88.
51.
PackardGrant, GershoffAndrew D., and WootenDavid B. (2016), “When Boastful Word of Mouth Helps Versus Hurts Social Perceptions and Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (1), 26–43.
52.
PackardGrant, and WootenDavid B. (2013), “Compensatory Knowledge Signaling in Consumer Word-of-Mouth,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23 (4), 434–50.
53.
PalmatierRobert W., ScheerLisa K., and SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2007), “Customer Loyalty to Whom? Managing the Benefits and Risks of Salesperson-Owned Loyalty,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 185–99.
54.
ParasuramanAnanthanarayanan, BerryLeonard L., and ZeithamlValarie A. (1988), “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality,”Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12–40.
55.
ParasuramanAnanthanarayanan, BerryLeonard L., and ZeithamlValarie A. (1991), “Understanding Customer Expectations of Service,”MIT Sloan Management Review, 32 (3), 39–48.
56.
PatrickVanessa M., and HagtvedtHenrik (2012), “‘I Don't’ Versus ‘I Can't’: When Empowered Refusal Motivates Goal-Directed Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 371–81.
57.
PenelopeJulia (1990), Speaking Freely. New York: Pergamon Press.
58.
PennebakerJames W. (2011), The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
59.
PennebakerJ.W., ChungC.K., IrelandM., GonzalesA., and BoothR.J. (2007). The Development and Psychometric Properties of 2007. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
60.
PinkerSteven (2007), The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. London: Viking.
61.
PreacherKristopher J., and HayesAndrew F. (2008), “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects In Multiple Mediator Models,”Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–91.
62.
RamaniGirish, and KumarVipin (2008), “Interaction Orientation And Firm Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (1), 27–45.
63.
RingbergTorsten, Odekerken-SchroderGaby, and ChristensenGlenn L. (2007), “A Cultural Models Approach to Service Recovery,”Journal of Marketing, 71 (3), 194–214.
64.
RudickMarilynne, and O'FlahavanLeslie (2002), Clear, Correct, Concise A Writing Workbook for Customer Service Agents. Silver Spring, MD: E-Write.
65.
RustRoland T., and ChungTuck Siong (2006), “Marketing Models of Service and Relationships,”Marketing Science, 25 (6), 560–80.
66.
SaxeRobert, and WeitzBarton A. (1982), “The SOCO Scale: A Measure of the Customer Orientation of Salespeople,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (3), 343–51.
67.
SchellekensGaby A.C., VerleghPeeter, and SmidtsAle (2010), “Language Abstraction in Word of Mouth,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 207–23.
68.
ScherwitzLarry, BertonKent, and LeventhalHoward (1978), “Type A Behavior, Self-Involvement, and Cardiovascular Response,”Psychosomatic Medicine, 40 (8), 593–609.
69.
SearleJohn R., KieferFerenc, and BierwischManfred (1980), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
70.
SeiderBenjamin H., HirschbergerGilad, NelsonKristin L., and LevensonRobert W. (2009), “We Can Work It Out: Age Differences in Relational Pronouns, Physiology, and Behavior in Marital Conflict,”Psychology and Aging, 24 (3), 604–13.
71.
SelaAner S., WheelerChristian, and Sarial-AbiGülen (2012), “We Are Not the Same as You and I: Causal Effects of Minor Language Variations on Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Brands,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 644–61.
72.
SenayIbrahim, AlbarracínDolores, and NoguchiKenji (2010), “Motivating Goal-Directed Behavior Through Introspective Self-Talk: The Role of the Interrogative Form of Simple Future Tense,”Psychological Science, 21 (4), 499–504.
73.
SinghJagdip, and SirdeshmukhDeepak (2000), “Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgments,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 150–67.
74.
SmallDeborah A., and VerrochiNicole M. (2009), “The Face of Need: Facial Emotion Expression on Charity Advertisements,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (6), 777–87.
75.
SmidtsAle, PruynAd Th. H., and Van RielCees B.M. (2001), “The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige on Organizational Identification,”Academy of Management Journal, 44 (5), 1051–62.
76.
SmithAmy K., BoltonRuth N., and WagnerJanet (1999), “A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (3), 356–72.
77.
SmithRobert W., ChandlerJesse J., and SchwarzNorbert (2017), “Uniformity: The Effects of Organizational Attire on Judgments and Attributions,” working paper, Ohio State University.
78.
SpencerSteven J., ZannaMark P., and FongGeoffrey T. (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analysis in Examining Psychological Processes,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 845–51.
79.
StreeckJurgen (1980), “Speech Acts in Interaction: A Critique of Searle,”Discourse Processes, 3, 133–54.
80.
VargoStephen L., and LuschRobert F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1–17.
81.
WalesKatie (1996), Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82.
YinDezhi, BondSamuel, and ZhangHan (2014), “Anxious or Angry? Effects of Discrete Emotions on the Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews,”Management Information Systems Quarterly, 38 (2), 539–60.
83.
ZeithamlValarie A., BerryLeonard L., and ParasuramanAnanthanarayanan (1996), “The Behavioural Consequences of Service Quality,”Journal of Marketing, 60 (2), 31–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
