To measure the effects of advertising, marketers must know how consumers would behave had they not seen the ads. The authors develop a methodology they call “ghost ads,” which facilitates this comparison by identifying the control group counterparts of the exposed consumers in a randomized experiment. The authors show that, relative to public service announcement and intent-to-treat A/B tests, ghost ads can reduce the cost of experimentation, improve measurement precision, deliver the relevant strategic baseline, and work with modern ad platforms that optimize ad delivery in real time. The authors also describe a variant, “predicted ghost ad” methodology, which is compatible with online display advertising platforms; their implementation records more than 100 million predicted ghost ads per day. The authors demonstrate the methodology with an online retailer's display retargeting campaign. They show novel evidence that retargeting can work: the ads lifted website visits by 17.2% and purchases by 10.5%. Compared with intent-to-treat and public service announcement experiments, advertisers can measure ad lift just as precisely while spending at least an order of magnitude less.
AdRoll (2014), “State of the Industry: A Close Look at Retargeting and the Programmatic Marketer,” technical report, AdRoll.
2.
BakshyEytan, EcklesDean, and BernsteinMichael S. (2014), “Designing and Deploying Online Field Experiments,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 283–92.
3.
BakshyEytan, EcklesDean, YanRong, and RosennItamar (2012), “Social Influence in Social Advertising: Evidence from Field Experiments,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 146–61.
4.
BarajasJoel, AkellaRam, HoltanMarius, and FloresAaron (2016), “Experimental Designs and Estimation for Online Display Advertising Attribution in Marketplaces,”Marketing Science, 35 (3), 465–83.
5.
BartYakov, StephenAndrew T., and SarvaryMiklos (2014), “Which Products Are Best Suited to Mobile Advertising? A Field Study of Mobile Display Advertising Effects on Consumer Attitudes and Intentions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (3), 270–85.
6.
BlakeThomas, NoskoChris, and TadelisSteven (2015), “Consumer Heterogeneity and Paid Search Effectiveness: A Large-Scale Field Experiment,”Econometrica, 83 (1), 155–74.
7.
BleierAlexander, and EisenbeissMaik (2015), “Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where,”Marketing Science, 34 (5), 669–88.
8.
CandelaJoaquin Q., BaileyMichael, and DominowskaEwa (2014), “Machine Learning and the Facebook Ads Auction,” presentation in Joint Session for EC, NBER and Decentralization on CS and Economics, EC14, Palo Alto, CA.
9.
CoeyDominic, and BaileyMichael (2016), “People and Cookies: Imperfect Treatment Assignment in Online Experiments,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: Association for Computing Machinery,
EfronBradley, and FeldmanD. (1991), “Compliance as an Explanatory Variable in Clinical Trials,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86 (413), 9–17.
12.
Facebook (2016), “How We're Making Ad Measurement More Insightful,” Facebook for Business News.
13.
GhoshArpita, McAfeePreston, PapineniKishore, and VassilvitskiiSergi (2009), “Bidding for Representative Allocations for Display Advertising,” in Internet and Network Economics. Berlin: Springer, 208–19.
14.
GluckM. (2011), “Best Practices for Conducting Online Ad Effectiveness Research,” technical report, Internet Advertising Bureau.
15.
GoldfarbAvi, and TuckerCatherine (2011), “Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness,”Marketing Science, 30 (3), 389–404.
16.
Google (2015), “Where Ads Might Appear in the Display Network,” Google Support.
17.
GordonBrett, ZettelmeyerFlorian, BhargavaNeha, and ChapskyDan (2017), “A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook,” white paper.
18.
HobanPaul R., and BucklinRandolph E. (2015), “Effects of Internet Display Advertising in the Purchase Funnel: Model-Based Insights from a Randomized Field Experiment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (3), 375–93.
19.
HuYe, LodishLeonard M., and KriegerAbba M. (2007), “An Analysis of Real World TV Advertising Tests: A 15-Year Update,”Journal of Advertising Research, 47 (3), 341–53.
ImbensGuido W., and AngristJoshua D. (1994), “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects,”Econometrica, 62 (2), 467–75.
23.
ImbensGuido W., and RubinDonald B. (2015), Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
JohnsonGarrett A., LewisRandall A., and NubbemeyerElmar I. (2017), “The Online Display Ad Effectiveness Funnel and Carryover: Lessons from 432 Field Experiments,” working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2701578.
25.
JohnsonGarrett A., LewisRandall A., and ReileyDavid (2017), “When Less Is More: Data and Power in Advertising Experiments,”Marketing Science, 36 (1), 43–53.
26.
KalyanamKirthi, McAteerJohn, MarekJonathan, HodgesJames A., and LinLifeng (2015), “Cross Channel Effects of Search Engine Advertising on Brick and Mortar Retail Sales: Insights from Multiple Large Scale Field Experiments on Google.com,” working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=268411.
27.
LambrechtAnja, and TuckerCatherine (2013), “When Does Retargeting Work? Information Specificity in Online Advertising,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (5), 561–76.
28.
LavrakasPaul J. (2010), “An Evaluation of Methods Used to Assess the Effectiveness of Advertising on the Internet,” technical report, Interactive Advertising Bureau.
29.
LewisRandall, RaoJustin M., and ReileyDavid H. (2015), “Measuring the Effects of Advertising: The Digital Frontier,” in Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy, GoldfarbAvi, GreensteinShane M., and TuckerCatherine E., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
LewisRandall A. (2014), “Worn-Out or Just Getting Started? The Impact of Frequency in Online Display Advertising,” working paper, Google.
31.
LewisRandall A., and NguyenDan (2015), “Display Advertising's Competitive Spillovers to Consumer Search,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 13 (2), 93–115.
32.
LewisRandall A., and RaoJustin M. (2015), “The Unfavorable Economics of Measuring the Returns to Advertising,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130 (4), 1941–73.
33.
LewisRandall A., and ReileyDavid H. (2014), “Online Ads and Offline Sales: Measuring the Effect of Retail Advertising via a Controlled Experiment on Yahoo,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 12 (3), 235–66.
34.
LodishLeonard, AbrahamMagid, KalmensonStuart, LivelsbergerJeanne, LubetkinBeth, RichardsonBruce, et al. (1995), “How TV Advertising Works: A Meta-Analysis of 389 Real World Split Cable TV Advertising Experiments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (2), 125–39.
35.
ManskiCharles F. (2007), Identification for Prediction and Decision. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
36.
MoriguchiTakeshi, XiongGuiyang, and LuoXueming (2016), “Retargeting Ads for Shopping Cart Recovery: Evidence from Online Field Experiments,” working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2847631.
37.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2011), “Measuring the Effectiveness of Online Advertising,” technical report, IAB France and SRI.
38.
SahniNavdeep (2015), “Effect of Temporal Spacing Between Advertising Exposures: Evidence from an Online Field Experiment,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 13 (3), 203–47.
39.
SahniNavdeep (2016), “Advertising Spillovers: Evidence from Online Field Experiments and Implications for Returns on Advertising,”Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (4), 459–78.
40.
SahniNavdeep S., and NairHarikesh (2016), “Does Advertising Serve as a Signal? Evidence from Field Experiments in Mobile Search,” working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2721468.
41.
SahniNavdeep S., NarayananS., and KalyanamK. (2016), “An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Retargeted Advertising: The Role of Frequency and Timing,” working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2852484.
42.
ShrivastavaA. (2015), “Understanding the Impact of Twitter Ads Through Conversion Lift Reports,” Twitter blog.
43.
SimesterD., HuJ., BrynjolfssonE., and AndersonE. (2009), “Dynamics of Retail Advertising: Evidence from a Field Experiment,”Economic Inquiry, 47 (3), 482–99.
44.
TuchmanA.E. (2016), “Advertising and Demand for Addictive Goods: The Effects of e-Cigarette Advertising,” working paper, Northwestern University.
45.
YildizT. and NarayananS. (2013), “Star Digital: Assessing the Effectiveness of Display Advertising,” Harvard Business Review Case Study.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
