In this study, the authors propose a flexible framework to assess customer lifetime value (CLV) in the consumer packaged goods (CPG) context. They address the substantive and modeling challenges that arise in this setting, namely, (1) multiple discreteness, (2) brand switching, and (3) budget-constrained consumption. Using a Bayesian estimation, the authors are also able to infer the consumer's latent budgetary constraint using only transaction information, thus enabling managers to understand the customer's budgetary constraint without having to survey or depend on aggregate measures of budget constraints. Using the proposed framework, CPG manufacturers can assess CLV at the focal brand level as well as at the category level, a departure from CLV literature, which has mostly been firm centric. The authors implement the proposed model on panel data in the carbonated beverages category and showcase the benefits of the proposed model over simpler heuristics and conventional CLV approaches. Finally, they conduct two policy simulations describing the role of the budget constraint on CLV, as well as the asymmetric effects of pricing in this setting, and develop managerial insights in this context.
AilawadiKusum L., NeslinScott A., and GedenkKaren (2001), “Pursuing the Value-Conscious Consumer: Store Brands Versus National Brand Promotions,”Journal of Marketing, 65 (January), 71–89.
2.
AilawadiKusum L., PauwelsKoen, and SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2008), “Private-Label Use and Store Loyalty,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (November), 19–30.
3.
AllenderWilliam J., RichardsTimothy J., ParkSungho, and HamiltonStephen F. (2013), “Demand for Variety Under Costly Consumer Search: A Multiple-Discrete/Continuous Approach,”working paper, [available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2309136].
4.
AntonidesGerrit, de GrootI. Manon, and van RaaijW. Fred (2011), “Mental Budgeting and the Management of Household Finance,”Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (4), 546–55.
5.
AssaelHenry (1974), “Product Classification and the Theory of Consumer Behavior,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2 (4), 539–52.
6.
BaxleyJohn V. and MoorhouseJohn C. (1984), “Lagrange Multiplier Problems in Economics,”American Mathematical Monthly, 91 (7), 404–12.
7.
BhatChandra R. (2008), “The Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model: Role of Utility Function Parameters, Identification Considerations, and Model Extensions,”Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42 (3), 274–303.
8.
CarlsonKurt A., WolfeJared, BlanchardSimon J., HuberJoel C., and ArielyDan (2015), “The Budget Contraction Effect: How Contracting Budgets Lead to Less Varied Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (June), 337–48.
9.
ChanTat Y. (2006), “Estimating a Continuous Hedonic-Choice Model with an Application to Demand for Soft Drinks,”Rand Journal of Economics, 37 (2), 466–82.
10.
CheemaAmar and SomanDilip (2006), “Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (1), 33–44.
11.
ChintaguntaPradeep K. and HaldarSudeep (1998), “Investigating Purchase Timing Behavior in Two Related Product Categories,”Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (February), 43–53.
12.
ChintaguntaPradeep K. and NairHarikesh S. (2011), “Structural Workshop Paper: Discrete-Choice Models of Consumer Demand in Marketing,”Marketing Science, 30 (6), 977–96.
13.
DuRex Y. and KamakuraWagner A. (2008), “Where Did All That Money Go? Understanding How Consumers Allocate Their Consumption Budget,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (November), 109–31.
14.
DubéJean-Pierre (2004), “Multiple Discreteness and Product Differentiation: Demand for Carbonated Soft Drinks,”Marketing Science, 23 (1), 66–81.
15.
DubéJean-Pierre, HitschGünter J., and RossiPeter E. (2010), “State Dependence and Alternative Explanations for Consumer Inertia,”Rand Journal of Economics, 41 (3), 417–45.
16.
FaderPeter S. and HardieBruce G.S. (1996), “Modeling Consumer Choice Among SKUs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (November), 442–52.
17.
GilboaItzhak, PostlewaiteAndrew, and SchmeidlerDavid (2010), “The Complexity of the Consumer Problem and Mental Accounting,”working paper, Tel Aviv University.
18.
GordonBrett R., GoldfarbAvi, and LiYang (2013), “Does Price Elasticity Vary with Economic Growth? A Cross-Category Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (February), 4–23.
19.
GuptaSunil, HanssensDominique, HardieBruce, KahnWiliam, KumarV., LinNathaniel, (2006), “Modeling Customer Lifetime Value,”Journal of Service Research, 9 (2), 139–55.
20.
GuptaSunil and LehmannDonald R. (2005), Managing Customers as Investments: The Strategic Value of Customers in the Long Run. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
21.
HeathChip and SollJack B. (1996), “Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (1), 40–52.
22.
HendelIgal (1999), “Estimating Multiple-Discrete Choice Models: An Application to Computerization Returns,”Review of Economic Studies, 66 (2), 423–46.
23.
HowellJohn R., LeeSanghak, and AllenbyGreg M. (2016), “Price Promotions in Choice Models,”Marketing Science, forthcoming [DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2015.0948].
24.
JainDipak C. and VilcassimNaufel J. (1991), “Investigating Household Purchase Timing Decisions: A Conditional Hazard Function Approach,”Marketing Science, 10 (1), 1–23.
25.
KimJaehwan, AllenbyGreg M., and RossiPeter E. (2002), “Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety,”Marketing Science, 21 (3), 229–50.
26.
KimJaehwan, AllenbyGreg M., and RossiPeter E. (2007), “Product Attributes and Models of Multiple Discreteness,”Journal of Econometrics, 138 (1), 208–30.
27.
KumarV. and LuoAnita (Man) (2008), “Integrating Purchase Timing, Choice, and Quantity Decisions Models: A Review of Model Specifications, Estimations, and Applications,” in Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 4, MalhotraNaresh K., ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 63–91.
28.
KumarV. and ShahDenish (2009), “Expanding the Role of Marketing: From Customer Equity to Market Capitalization,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (November), 119–36.
29.
LewisMichael (2004), “The Influence of Loyalty Programs and Short-Term Promotions on Customer Retention,”Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (August), 281–92.
30.
LiuHongju, PancrasJoseph, and HoutzMalcolm (2015), “Managing Customer Acquisition Risk Using Co-operative Databases,”Journal of Interactive Marketing, 29 (February), 39–56.
31.
MaYu, AilawadiKusum L., and GrewalDhruv (2013), “Soda Versus Cereal and Sugar Versus Fat: Drivers of Healthful Food Intake and the Impact of Diabetes Diagnosis,”Journal of Marketing, 77 (May), 101–20.
32.
ManchandaPuneet, AnsariAsim, and GuptaSunil (1999), “The ‘Shopping Basket’: A Model for Multicategory Purchase Incidence Decisions,”Marketing Science, 18 (2), 95–114.
33.
MilkmanKatherine L. and BeshearsJohn (2009), “Mental Accounting and Small Windfalls: Evidence from an Online Grocer,”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71 (2), 384–94.
34.
PancrasJoseph (2011), “The Nested Consideration Model: Investigating Dynamic Store Consideration Sets and Store Competition,”European Journal of Operational Research, 214 (2), 340–47.
35.
PrelecDrazen and LoewensteinGeorge (1998), “The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt,”Marketing Science, 17 (1), 4–28.
36.
RatneshwarS., PechmannCornelia, and ShockerAllan D. (1996), “Goal-Derived Categories and the Antecedents of Across-Category Consideration,”Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (3), 240–50.
37.
RichardsTimothy J., GómezMiguel I., and PofahlGeoffrey (2012), “A Multiple-Discrete/Continuous Model of Price Promotion,”Journal of Retailing, 88 (2), 206–25.
38.
RustRoland T., LemonKatherine N., and ZeithamlValarie A. (2004), “Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 109–27.
39.
SatomuraTakuya, KimJaehwan, and AllenbyGreg M. (2011), “Multiple-Constraint Choice Models with Corner and Interior Solutions,”Marketing Science, 30 (3), 481–90.
40.
SeetharamanP.B. (2004), “Modeling Multiple Sources of State Dependence in Random Utility Models: A Distributed Lag Approach,”Marketing Science, 23 (2), 263–71.
41.
SeetharamanP.B., AinslieAndrew, and ChintaguntaPradeep K. (1999), “Investigating Household State Dependence Effects Across Categories,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November), 488–500.
42.
SeetharamanP.B. and ChintaguntaPradeep (1998), “A Model of Inertia and Variety-Seeking with Marketing Variables,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15 (1), 1–17.
43.
ShahDenish, KumarV., and Hannah KimKihyun (2014), “Managing Customer Profits: The Power of Habits,”Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (December), 726–41.
44.
ShankarVenkatesh and KannanP.K. (2014), “An Across-Store Analysis of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cross-Category Effects,”Customer Needs and Solutions, 1 (2), 143–53.
45.
StilleyKaren M., InmanJ. Jeffrey, and WakefieldKirk L. (2010), “Planning to Make Unplanned Purchases? The Role of In-Store Slack in Budget Deviation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 264–78.
Van OestRutger (2005), “Which Brands Gain Share from Which Brands? Inference from Store-Level Scanner Data,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3 (3), 281–304.
48.
VenkatesanRajkumar and KumarV. (2004), “A Customer Lifetime Value Framework for Customer Selection and Resource Allocation Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 106–25.
49.
VenkatesanRajkumar, KumarV., and BohlingTimothy (2007), “Optimal Customer Relationship Management Using Bayesian Decision Theory: An Application for Customer Selection,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (November), 579–94.
50.
YooShijin, HanssensDominique M., and KimHo (2011), “Marketing and the Evolution of Customer Equity of Frequently Purchased Brands,”working paper, Korea University Business School.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
