The pervasive use of merchandise (i.e., noncash) incentives in sales compensation plans is an empirical and theoretical puzzle given the supposed superiority of cash incentives in the standard theory (i.e., principal–agent models) as well as the scant, and contradictory empirical evidence. The authors conducted a large-scale field intervention that switched 580 salespeople at a large frozen food manufacturer away from their cash plus “merchandise points” bonus to a commensurate all-cash bonus. After controlling for salesperson, seasonality, year, and target effects, the authors estimate that sales, on average, dropped by 4.36%. Furthermore, they estimated individual-level sales changes and effort changes to validate the incentive–effort–sales causal chain. The results show that the top salespeople experienced the largest drops in sales. A post-intervention survey of social and individual difference variables reveals that salespeople from households with more discretionary financial resources and those who think more abstractly about the uses of cash income exhibited smaller reductions in effort and sales. Although the absence of a control group prevents the authors from making strong causal inferences, this set of results nevertheless provides descriptive and suggestive evidence for separate mental accounts as the most promising explanation for the greater utility provided by merchandise incentives.
AkerlofGeorge (1982), “Labour Contracts as a Partial Gift Exchange,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97 (4), 543–69.
2.
AroraNeeraj and AllenbyGreg M. (1999), “Measuring the Influence of Individual Preference Structures in Group Decision Making,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (4), 476–87.
3.
AshrafNavaKarlanDean and YinWesley (2006), “Tying Odysseus to the Mast: Evidence from a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 (2), 635–72.
4.
BandieraOrianaRasulImran and BarankayIwan (2005), “Social Preferences and the Response to Incentives: Evidence from Personnel Data,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (3), 917–62.
5.
BandieraOrianaRasulImran and BarankayIwan (2011), “Field Experiments with Firms,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25 (3), 63–82.
6.
BatraRajeev and AhtolaOlli T. (1990), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes,”Marketing Letters, 2 (2), 159–70.
ChungDoug J.SteenburghThomas and SudhirK. (2014), “Do Bonuses Enhance Sales Productivity? A Dynamic Structural Analysis of Bonus-Based Compensation Plans,”Marketing Science, 33 (2), 165–87.
9.
ChurchillGilbert A.FordNeil M. and WalkerOrville C. (1985), “Differences in the Attractiveness of Alternative Rewards Among Industrial Salespeople: Additional Evidence,”Journal of Business Research, 13 (2), 123–28.
10.
DharRavi and KimEunice Y. (2007), “Seeing the Forest or the Trees: Implications of Construal Level Theory for Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (2), 96–100.
11.
DharRavi and WertenbrochKlaus (2000), “Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (1), 60–71.
12.
DoroticMatildaBijmoltTammo H.A., and VerhoefPeter C. (2012), “Loyalty Programmes: Current Knowledge and Research Directions,”International Journal of Management Reviews, 14 (3), 217–37.
13.
DrèzeJean, and NunesJoseph C. (2004), “Using Combined-Currency Prices to Lower Consumers’ Perceived Cost,”Journal of Marketing Research, 59 (1), 59–72.
14.
FiedlerKlaus (2007), “Construal Level Theory as an Integrative Framework for Behavioral Decision-Making Research and Consumer Psychology,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (2), 101–06.
15.
GneezyUri and ListJohn A (2006), “Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments,”Econometrica, 74 (5), 1365–84.
16.
GravalosTom K. and JackJohn M. (2007), “The Trouble with Money,”Business Insider Report.
17.
HarrisonGlen W. and ListJohn (2004), “Field Experiments,”Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (4), 1009–55.
18.
HolbrookMorris B. (1999), “Introduction to Consumer Value,” in Consumer Value: A Framework of Analysis and Research, BrownStephen and SternBarbara B., eds. New York: Routledge, 1–28.
19.
Incentive Federation (2013), “A Study Conducted Among Current User of Merchandise and Travel Items for Motivation/Incentive Applications,” research study.
20.
JeffreyScott A. (2009), “Justifiability and the Motivational Power of Tangible Noncash Incentives,”Human Performance, 22 (2), 143–55.
21.
KahnemanDaniel and TverskyAmos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica, 47 (2), 263–91.
22.
KardesFrank R.CronleyMaria L. and KimJohn (2006), “Construal-Level Effects on Preference Stability, Preference-Behavior Correspondence, and the Suppression of Competing Brands,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (2), 135–44.
23.
KehHaen T. and LeeYih H. (2006), “Do Reward Programs Build Loyalty for Services? The Moderating Effect of Satisfaction on Type and Timing of Rewards,”Journal of Retailing, 82 (2), 127–36.
24.
KivetzRan (2003), “The Effects of Effort and Intrinsic Motivation on Risky Choice,”Marketing Science, 22 (4), 477–502.
25.
KivetzRan (2005), “Promotion Reactance: The Role of Effort-Reward Congruity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 725–36.
26.
KubeSebastianMaréchalMichel André, and PuppeClemens (2012), “The Currency of Reciprocity: Gift Exchange in the Workplace,”American Economic Review, 102 (4), 1644–62.
27.
LaibsonDavid (2001), “A Cue-Theory of Consumption,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (1), 81–119.
28.
LazearEdward P. (1986), “Salaries and Piece Rates,”Journal of Business, 59 (3), 405–31.
29.
LazearEdward P. (2000), “The Power of Incentives,”American Economic Review, 90 (2), 410–14.
30.
ListJohn and RasulImran (2011), “Field Experiments in Labor Economics,”in Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A, AshenfelterOrley and CardDavid, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 103–228.
31.
LoDesmond (Ho-Fu), GhoshMrinal, and LafontaineFrancine (2011), “The Incentive and Selection Roles of Sales Force Compensation Contracts,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (4), 781–98.
32.
LoewensteinG.WeberElke U.HseeChristopher K. and WelchNed (2001), “Risk as Feelings,”Psychological Bulletin, 127 (2), 267–86.
33.
MarinoAnthony M. and ZabojnikJan (2008), “Work-Related Perks, Agency Problems, and Optimal Incentive Contracts,”Rand Journal of Economics, 39 (2), 565–85.
34.
MelanconJ. Phillips, NobleStephanie M., and NobleCharles H. (2011), “Managing Rewards to Enhance Relational Worth,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (3), 1–22.
35.
MisraSanjog and NairHarikesh (2011), “A Dynamic Structural Model of Sales-Force Compensation: Estimation and Field Implementation,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 9 (3), 211–25.
36.
NunesJoseph C. and ParkC. Whan (2003), “Incommensurate Resources: Not Just More of the Same,”Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (1), 26–38.
37.
OyerPaul (2008), “Salary or Benefits?” in Work, Earnings and Other Aspects of the Employment Relation Research in Labor Economics, Research in Labor Economics, Volume 28, PolachekSolomon W. and TatsiramosKonstantinos, eds. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 429–67.
38.
OyerPaul and SchaeferScott (2005), “Why Do Some Firms Give Stock Options to All Employees?: An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories,”Journal of Financial Economics, 76 (1), 99–133.
39.
RebitzerJames and TaylorL. (2011), “Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motives: Standard and Behavioral Approaches to Agency and Labor Markets,” in Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A, AshenfelterOrley and CardDavid, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 701–72.
40.
ShadishWilliam R.CookThomas D. and CampbellDonald T. (2002), Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
41.
ShafferVictoria A. and ArkesHal R. (2009), “Preference Reversals in the Evaluation of Cash Versus Noncash Incentives,”Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (6), 859–72.
42.
SmithAndrew and SparksLeigh (2009), “Reward Redemption Behaviour in Retail Loyalty Schemes,”British Journal of Management, 20 (2), 204–18.
43.
SteenburghThomas and AhearneMichael (2012), “Motivating Salespeople: What Really Works,”Harvard Business Review, 90 (July/August), 70–75.
44.
StourmValeriaBradlowEric T. and FaderPeter S. (2015), “Stockpiling Points in Linear Loyalty Programs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (2), 253–67.
45.
StrahilevitzMichal and MyersJoan G. (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentive: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 434–46.
46.
ThalerRichard H. (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,”Marketing Science, 4 (3), 199–214.
47.
ThalerRichard H. (1999), “Mental Accounting Matters,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12 (3), 183–206.
48.
TropeYaacov and LibermanNira (2000), “Temporal Construal and Time-Dependent Changes in Preference,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 876–89.
49.
YiYoujae and JeonHoseong (2003), “Effects of Loyalty Programs on Value Perception, Program Loyalty, and Brand Loyalty,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (3), 229–40.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
