Consumers frequently consume hedonic products together with other consumers and derive value from this shared experience. This article investigates the impact of shared consumption, a type of social influence that determines the enjoyment of joint experiences, in the context of a typical hedonic product: movies. The authors argue that this type of influence has important consequences for the diffusion curves of hedonic goods that are consumed together and the effectiveness of advertising in generating launch and postlaunch sales. An empirically validated agent-based model simulates the U.S. motion picture market, with new movies launching, competing, and exiting. The agent-based model serves as a means to demonstrate the essential role of shared consumption for explaining movie life cycles and tests how advertising expenditures accelerate and/or acquire movies’ demand in markets with varying levels of shared consumption. The results provide key theoretical insights for the new product diffusion of hedonic products and help managers predict the financial consequences of their strategic decisions.
AinslieAndrew, DrèzeXavier, and ZufrydenFred (2005), “Modeling Movie Life Cycles and Market Share,”Marketing Science, 24 (3), 508–17.
2.
AralSinan, MuchnikLev, and SundararajanArun (2009), “Distinguishing Influence-Based Contagion from Homophily-Driven Diffusion in Dynamic Networks,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (51), 21544–49.
3.
AralSinan and WalkerDylan (2012), “Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks,”Science, 337 (6092), 337–41.
4.
ArielyDan and LevavJonathan (2000), “Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (3), 279–90.
5.
AroraNeeraj and AllenbyGreg M. (1999), “Measuring the Influence of Individual Preference Structures in Group Decision Making,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November), 476–87.
6.
AssmusGert, FarleyJohn U., and LehmannDonald R. (1984), “How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (February), 65–74.
7.
BagozziRichard P. (2000), “On the Concept of Intentional Social Action in Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (3), 388–96.
8.
BarsadeSigal G. (2002), “The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and Its Influence on Group Behavior,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (4), 644–75.
9.
BassFrank M. (1969), “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables,”Management Science, 15 (5), 215–27.
10.
BasuroySuman, DesaiKalpesh K., and TalukdarDebabrata (2006), “An Empirical Investigation of Signaling in the Motion Picture Industry,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (April), 287–95.
11.
CaldarelliGuido (2007), Scale-Free Networks: Complex Webs in Nature and Technology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
ChenYubo, WangQi, and XieJinhong (2011), “Online Social Interactions: A Natural Experiment on Word of Mouth Versus Observational Learning,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (April), 238–54.
13.
ChintaguntaPradeep K., GopinathShyam, and VenkataramanSriram (2010), “The Effects of Online User Reviews on Movie Box Office Performance: Accounting for Sequential Rollout and Aggregation Across Local Markets,”Marketing Science, 29 (5), 944–57.
14.
DellarocasChrysanthos, ZhangXiaoquan M., and AwadNeveen F. (2007), “Exploring the Value of Online Product Reviews in Forecasting Sales: The Case of Motion Pictures,”Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (4), 23–45.
15.
DelreSebastiano A., JagerWander, BijmoltTammo H.A., and JanssenMarco A. (2007), “Targeting and Timing Promotional Activities: An Agent-Based Model for the Takeoff of New Products,”Journal of Business Research, 60 (8), 826–35.
16.
DelreSebastiano A., JagerWander, BijmoltTammo H.A., and JanssenMarco A. (2010), “Will It Spread or Not? The Effects of Social Influences and Network Topology on Innovation Diffusion,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (2), 267–82.
17.
DeutschMorton and GerardHarold B. (1955), “A Study of Normative and Informative Social Influences upon Individual Judgment,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51 (3), 629–36.
18.
DoverYaniv, GoldenbergJacob, and ShapiraDaniel (2012), “Network Traces on Penetration: Uncovering Degree Distribution from Adoption Data,”Marketing Science, 31 (4), 689–712.
19.
EinavLiran (2007), “Seasonality in the U.S. Motion Picture Industry,”RAND Journal of Economics, 38 (1), 127–45.
20.
ElberseAnita (2013), Blockbusters: Hit-Making, Risk-Taking, and the Big Business of Entertainment. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
21.
ElberseAnita and AnandBharat (2007), “Advertising and Expectations: the Effectiveness of Pre-Release Advertising for Motion Pictures: An Empirical Investigation Using a Simulated Market,”Information Economics and Policy, 19 (3/4), 319–43.
22.
ElberseAnita and EliashbergJehoshua (2003), “Demand and Supply Dynamics for Sequentially Released Products in International Markets: The Case of Motion Pictures,”Marketing Science, 22 (3), 329–54.
23.
EliashbergJehoshua, ElberseAnita, and LeendersMark A.A.M. (2006), “The Motion Picture Industry: Critical Issues in Practice, Current Research and New Research Directions,”Marketing Science, 25 (6), 638–61.
24.
EliashbergJehoshua, HegieQuintus, HoJason, HuismanDennis, MillerSteven J., SwamiSanjeev, (2009), “Demand-Driven Scheduling of Movies in a Multiplex,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26 (2), 75–88.
GemserGerda, Van OostrumMartine, and LeendersMark A.A.M. (2007), “The Impact of Film Reviews on the Box Office Performance of Art House Versus Mainstream Motion Pictures,”Journal of Cultural Economics, 31 (1), 43–63.
27.
GodesDavid and MayzlinDina (2009), “Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test,”Marketing Science, 28 (4), 721–39.
28.
GoldenbergJacob, LibaiBarak, MoldovanSarit, and MullerEitan (2007), “The NPV of Bad News,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (3), 186–200.
29.
GoldenbergJacob, LibaiBarak, and MullerEitan (2002), “Riding the Saddle: How Cross-Market Communications Can Create a Major Slump in Sales,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (March), 1–66.
30.
GoldenbergJacob, LibaiBarak, and MullerEitan (2010), “The Chilling Effects of Network Externalities,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (1), 4–15.
31.
GolubBenjamin and JacksonMatthew O. (2012), “How Homophily Affects the Speed of Learning and Best-Response Dynamics,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (3), 1287–338.
32.
HanssensDominique M., ParsonsLeonard J., and SchultzRandall L. (2001), Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis, 2nd ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
33.
HartmannWesley R. (2010), “Demand Estimation with Social Interactions and the Implications for Targeted Marketing,”Marketing Science, 29 (4), 585–601.
34.
Hennig-ThurauThorsten, HenningVictor, SattlerHenrik, EggersFelix, and HoustonMark B. (2007), “The Last Picture Show? Timing and Order of Movie Distribution Channels,”Journal of Marketing, 71 (October), 63–83.
35.
Hennig-ThurauThorsten, HoustonMark B., and SridharShrihari (2006), “Can Good Marketing Carry a Bad Product? Evidence from the Motion Picture Industry,”Marketing Letters, 17 (3), 205–19.
36.
Hennig-ThurauThorsten, MarchandAndré, and MarxPaul (2012), “Can Automated Group Recommender Systems Help Consumers Make Better Choices?”Journal of Marketing, 76 (September), 89–109.
37.
JedidiKamel, KriderRobert E., and WeinbergCharles B. (1998), “Clustering at the Movies,”Marketing Letters, 9 (4), 393–405.
38.
JoshiAmit M. and HanssensDominique M. (2009), “Movie Advertising and the Stock Market Valuation of Studios: A Case of ‘Great Expectations’?”Marketing Science, 28 (2), 239–50.
39.
KarniouchinaEkaterina V. (2011), “Impact of Star and Movie Buzz on Motion Picture Distribution and Box Office Revenue,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28 (1), 62–74.
40.
KriderRobert E., LiTieshan, LiuYong, and WeinbergCharles B. (2005), “The Lead-Lag Puzzle of Demand and Distribution: A Graphical Method Applied to Movies,”Marketing Science, 24 (4), 635–45.
41.
KriderRobert E. and WeinbergCharles B. (1997), “Spatial Competition and Bounded Rationality: Retailing at the Edge of Chaos,”Geographical Analysis, 29 (1), 16–34.
42.
LibaiBarak, MullerEitan, and PeresRenana (2005), “The Role of Seeding in Multi-Market Entry,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22 (4), 375–93.
43.
LibaiBarak, MullerEitan, and PeresRenana (2013), “Decomposing the Value of Word-of-Mouth Seeding Programs: Acceleration Versus Expansion,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (April), 161–76.
44.
LilienGary L., RangaswamyArvind, and De BruynArnaud (2007), Principles of Marketing Engineering. Bloomington, IN: Trafford.
45.
LiljerosFredrik, EdlingChristofer R., AmaralLuis A.N., StanleyH. Eugene, and ÅbergYvonne (2001), “The Web of Human Sexual Contacts,”Nature, 411, 907–08.
46.
LiuYong (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenues,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (July), 74–89.
47.
LovettMitchell, PeresRenana, and ShacharRon (2013), “On Brands and Word of Mouth,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (August), 427–44.
NitzanIrit and LibaiBarak (2011), “Social Effects on Customer Retention,”Journal of Marketing, 75 (November), 24–38.
52.
NorrisBruce I., FoutzNathasa Z., and KolsariciCeren (2012), “Dynamic Effectiveness of Advertising and Word of Mouth in Sequential Distribution of New Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (August), 469–86.
53.
PeresRenana, MullerEitan, and MahajanVijay (2010), “Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models: A Critical Review and Research Directions,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (2), 91–106.
54.
RaghunathanRajagopal and CorfmanKim (2006), “Is Happiness Shared Doubled and Sadness Shared Halved? Social Influence on Enjoyment of Hedonic Experiences,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (August), 386–94.
55.
RandWilliam and RustRoland T. (2011), “Agent-Based Modeling in Marketing: Guidelines for Rigor,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28 (3), 181–93.
56.
RatnerRebecca K. and HamiltonRebecca W. (2015), “Inhibited from Bowling Alone,”Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (2), 266–83.
57.
RisseladaHans, VerhoefPeter C., and BijmoltTammo H.A. (2014), “Dynamic Effects of Social Influence and Direct Marketing on the Adoption of High-Technology Products,”Journal of Marketing, 78 (March), 52–68.
58.
SawhneyMohanbir S. and EliashbergJehoshua (1996), “A Parsimonious Model for Forecasting Gross Box-Office Revenues of Motion Pictures,”Marketing Science, 15 (2), 113–31.
59.
TrusovMichael, RandWilliam, and JoshiYogesh V. (2013), “Improving Prelaunch Diffusion Forecasts: Using Synthetic Networks as Simulated Priors,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (December), 675–90.
60.
Ugander, Johan, Brian Karrer, Lars Backstrom, and Cameron Marlow (2011), “The Anatomy of the Facebook Social Graph,” (accessed February 23, 2016), [available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4503].
61.
Van den BulteChristophe and JoshiYogesh V. (2007), “New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators,”Marketing Science, 26 (3), 400–21.
62.
WattsDuncan J. and DoddsPeter S. (2007), “Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (4), 441–58.
63.
WeinbergCharles B. (2005), “Profits out of the Picture: Research Issues and Revenue Sources Beyond the North American Box Office,” in A Concise Handbook of Movie Industry Economics, MoulC.C., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 163–97.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
