People often brag about, or advertise, their good deeds to others. Seven studies investigate how bragging about prosocial behavior affects perceived generosity. The authors propose that bragging conveys information about an actor's good deeds, leading to an attribution of generosity. However, bragging also signals a selfish motivation (a desire for credit) that undermines the attribution of generosity. Thus, bragging has a positive effect when prosocial behavior is unknown because it informs others that an actor has behaved generously. However, bragging does not help—and often hurts—when prosocial behavior is already known, because it signals a selfish motive. In addition, the authors demonstrate that conspicuous cause marketing products have effects akin to bragging by signaling an impure motive for doing good deeds. Finally, the authors argue that bragging about prosocial behavior is unique because it undermines the precise information that the braggart is trying to convey (generosity). In contrast, bragging about personal achievements does not affect perceptions of the focal trait conveyed in the brag. These findings underscore the strategic considerations inherent in signaling altruism.
AmesDaniel R., RosePaul, and AndersonCameron P., (2006), “The NPI-16 as a Short Measure of Narcissism,”Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440–50.
2.
ArielyDan, BrachaAnat, and MeierStephan (2009), “Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially,”American Economic Review, 99(1), 544–55.
3.
BaraschAlixandra, LevineEmma, BermanJonathan Z., and SmallDeborah A. (2014), “Selfish or Selfless? On the Signal Value of Emotion in Prosocial Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 393–413.
4.
BaumeisterRoy F. (1982), “A Self-Presentational View of Social Phenomena,”Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3–26.
5.
BelkRussell W. (1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–67.
6.
BemDaryl J. (1972), “Self-Perception Theory,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6, BerkowitzLeonard, ed. New York: Academic Press, 1–62.
7.
BénabouRoland, and TiroleJean (2010), “Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility,”Economica, 77(305), 1–19.
8.
BergerJonah, and HeathChip (2007), “Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity-Signaling and Product Domains,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–34.
9.
BergerJonah, and WardMorgan (2010), “Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 555–69.
10.
BodnerRonit, and PrelecDrazen (2003), “The Diagnostic Value of Actions in a Self-Signaling Model,” in The Psychology of Economic Decisions, Vol. 1, BrocasIsabelle, and CarilloJuan D., eds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 105–123.
11.
BradleyGifford Weary (1978), “Self-Serving Biases in the Attribution Process: A Re-Examination of the Fact or Fiction Question,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 56–71.
12.
BrownJonathan D. (1986), “Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments,”Social Cognition, 4(4), 353–76.
13.
BrownThomas J., and DacinPeter (1997), “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses,”Journal of Marketing, 61(January), 68–84.
14.
CampbellMargaret C., and KirmaniAmna (2000), “Consumers’ Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83.
15.
ChanCindy, BergerJonah, and Van BovenLeif (2012), “Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 561–73.
16.
CritcherClayton R., and DunningDavid (2011), “No Good Deed Goes Unquestioned: Cynical Reconstruals Maintain Belief in the Power of Self-Interest,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1207–1213.
17.
DuShuili, BhattacharyaC.B., and SenSankar (2007), “Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–41.
18.
EllenPam Scholder, MohrLois A., and WebbDeborah J. (2006), “Charitable Programs and the Retailer: Do They Mix?”Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393–406.
19.
EllingsenTore, and JohannessonMagnus (2011), “Conspicuous Generosity,”Journal of Public Economics, 95(9/10), 1131–43.
20.
FeinSteven (1996), “Effects of Suspicion on Attributional Thinking and the Correspondence Bias,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1164–84.
21.
FeinSteven, HiltonJames L., and MillerDale T. (1990), “Suspicion of Ulterior Motivation and the Correspondence Bias,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 753–64.
22.
FennisBob M., JanssenLoes, and VohsKathleen D. (2009), “Acts of Benevolence: A Limited-Resource Account of Compliance with Charitable Requests,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 906–924.
23.
FlynnFrancis J. (2003), “How Much Should I Give and How Often? The Effects of Generosity and Frequency or Favor Exchange on Social Status and Productivity,”Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 539–53.
24.
FlynnFrancis J., ReagansRay E., AmanatullahEmily T., and AmesDaniel R. (2006), “Helping One's Way to the Top: Self-Monitors Achieve Status by Helping Others and Knowing Who Helps Whom,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1123–37.
25.
FriestadMarian, and WrightPeter (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.
26.
GneezyAyelet, GneezyUri, NelsonLeif D., and BrownAmber (2010), “Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving,”Science, 329(5989), 325–27.
27.
GodfreyDebra K., JonesEdward E., and LordCharles G. (1986), “Self-Promotion Is Not Ingratiating,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 106–115.
28.
GriskeviciusVladis, TyburJoshua M., and Van den BerghBram (2011), “Going Green to Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.
29.
HanYoung Jee, NunesJoseph C., and DrèzeXavier (2010), “Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence,”Journal of Marketing, 74(July), 15–30.
30.
HarbaughWilliam T. (1998a), “The Prestige Motive for Making Charitable Transfers,”American Economic Review, 88(2), 277–82.
31.
HarbaughWilliam T. (1998b), “What Do Donations Buy? A Model of Philanthropy Based on Prestige and Warm Glow,”Journal of Public Economy, 67(2), 269–84.
32.
HardyCharlie L., and Van VugtMark (2006), “Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402–1413.
33.
HayesAndrew F., and PreacherKristopher J. (2013), “Statistical Mediation Analysis with a Multicategorical Independent Variable,”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 1–20.
34.
HeymanGail, BarnerDavid, HeumannJennifer, and SchenckLauren (2014), “Children's Sensitivity to Ulterior Motives When Evaluating Prosocial Behavior,”Cognitive Science, 38(4), 683–700.
35.
HoltgravesThomas, and SrullThomas K. (1989), “The Effects of Positive Self-Descriptions on Impressions: General Principles and Individual Differences,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(3), 452–62.
JonesEdward E., and PittmanThane S. (1982), “Toward a General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation,” in Psychological Perspectives on the Self, Vol. 1, SulsJerry, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 231–62.
38.
JonesEdward E., and WortmanCamille (1973), Ingratiation: An Attributional Approach.Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
39.
KristoffersonKirk, WhiteKatherine, and PelozaJohn (2014), “The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action,”Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149–66.
40.
LacateraNicola, and MacisMario (2010), “Social Image Concerns and Prosocial Behavior: Field Evidence from a Nonlinear Incentive Scheme,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(2), 225–37.
41.
LearyMark R., and KowalskiRobin M. (1990), “Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model,”Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47.
42.
Lin-HealyFern, and SmallDeborah A. (2013), “Nice Guys Finish Last and Guys in Last Are Nice: The Clash Between Doing Well and Doing Good,”Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 685–91.
43.
LiuWendy, and AakerJennifer (2008), “The Happiness of Giving: The Time-Ask Effect,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543–57.
44.
MillerDale T. (1999), “The Norm of Self-Interest,”American Psychologist, 54(12), 1053–60.
45.
MillerDale T., and RatnerRebecca K. (1998), “The Disparity Between the Actual and Assumed Power of Self-Interest,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 53–62.
46.
MurrayKeith B., and VogelChristine M. (1997), “Using a Hierarchy-of-Effects Approach to Gauge the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility to Generate Goodwill Toward the Firm: Financial Versus Nonfinancial Impacts,”Journal of Business Research, 38(2), 141–59.
47.
NewmanGeorge E., and CainDaylian M. (2014), “Tainted Altruism: When Doing Some Good Is Evaluated Worse Than Doing No Good at All,”Psychological Science, 25(3), 648–55.
48.
OlivolaChristopher Y., and ShafirEldar (2013), “The Martyrdom Effect: When Pain and Effort Increase Prosocial Contributions,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(1), 91–105.
49.
PfefferJeffrey, FongChristina T., CialdiniRobert B., and PortnoyRebecca R. (2006), “Overcoming the Self-Promotion Dilemma: Interpersonal Attraction and Extra Help as a Consequence of Who Sings One's Praises,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1362–74.
50.
PreacherKristopher J., RuckerDerek D., and HayesAndrew (2007), “Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions,”Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
51.
ReederGlen D. (2009), “Mindreading: Judgments About Intentionality and Motives in Dispositional Inference,”Psychological Inquiry, 20(1), 1–18.
52.
ReederGlen D., and SporesJohn M. (1983), “The Attribution of Morality,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 736–45.
53.
SchembriSharon (2009), “Reframing Brand Experience: The Experiential Meaning of Harley-Davidson,”Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 1299–1310.
54.
SchlenkerBarry R., and LearyMark R. (1982), “Audiences’ Reactions to Self-Enhancing, Self-Denigrating, and Accurate Self-Presentations,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(1), 89–104.
55.
SenSankar, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2001), “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(May), 225–43.
56.
ShangJen, ReedAmericusII, and CrosonRachel (2008), “Identity Congruency Effects on Donations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(June), 351–61.
57.
SimmonsJoseph P., NelsonLeif D., and SimonsohnUri (2011), “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant,”Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–66.
58.
SingerPeter (2009), The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty.New York: Random House.
59.
SmallDeborah A., and SimonsohnUri (2008), “Friends of Victims: Personal Experience and Prosocial Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 532–42.
60.
SmallDeborah A., and VerrochiNicole (2009), “The Face of Need: Facial Emotion Expression on Charity Advertisements,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46(December), 777–87.
61.
SmithRobert W., FaroDavid, and BursonKatherine A. (2013), “More for the Many: The Influence of Entitativity on Charitable Giving,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 961–76.
62.
SolomonMichael R. (1983), “The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 319–29.
63.
Tal-OrNurit (2010), “Bragging in the Right Context: Impressions Formed of Self-Promoters Who Create a Context for Their Boasts,”Social Influence, 5(1), 23–39.
64.
TetlockPhilip E. (2002), “Social Functionalist Frameworks for Judgment and Choice: People as Intuitive Politicians, Theologians, and Prosecutors,”Psychological Review, 109(3), 451–71.
65.
TorelliCarlos J., MongaAlokparna Basu, and KaikatiAndrew M. (2012), “Doing Poorly by Doing Good: Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Concepts,”Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 948–63.
66.
VeblenThorstein (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class.New York: Penguin.
67.
WernerfeltBirger (1990), “Advertising Content When Brand Choice Is a Signal,”Journal of Business, 63(1), 91–98.
68.
WhiteKatherine, and PelozaJohn (2009), “Self-Benefit Versus Other-Benefit Marketing Appeals: Their Effectiveness in Generating Charitable Support,”Journal of Marketing, 7(July), 109–124.
69.
WinterichKaren Page, MittalVikas, and RossWilliam T.Jr., (2009), “Donation Behavior Toward In-Groups and Out-Groups: The Role of Gender and Moral Identity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 199–214.
70.
WojciskeBogdan, BazinskaRoza, and JaworskiMarcin (1998), “On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1251–64.
71.
YoonYeosun, Gürhan-CanliZeynep, and SchwarzNorbert (2006), “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies with Bad Reputations,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
