Given recent interest in social media, many brands now create content that they hope consumers will view and share with peers. While some campaigns indeed go “viral,” their value to the brand is limited if they do not boost brand evaluation or increase purchase. Consequently, a key question is how to create valuable virality, or content that is not only shared but also beneficial to the brand. Share data from hundreds of real online ads, as well as controlled laboratory experiments, demonstrate that compared with informative appeals (which focus on product features), emotional appeals (which use drama, mood, music, and other emotion-eliciting strategies) are more likely to be shared. Informative appeals, in contrast, boost brand evaluations and purchase because the brand is an integral part of the ad content. By combining the benefits of both approaches, emotional brand-integral ads boost sharing while also bolstering brand-related outcomes. The authors’ framework sheds light on how companies can generate valuable virality and the mechanisms underlying these effects.
AngSwee HoonLeeYih Hwai, and LeongSiew Meng (2007), “The Ad Creativity Cube: Conceptualization and Initial Validation,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (2), 220–32.
2.
AngSwee Hoon and LowSharon (2000), “Exploring the Dimensions of Ad Creativity,”Psychology and Marketing, 17 (10), 835–54.
3.
BabićAna, SotgiuFrancesca, de ValckKristine, and BijmoltTammo H.A. (2016), “The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors,”Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (June), 297–318.
4.
BagozziRichard P.Gürhan-CanliZeynep, and PriesterJoseph R. (2002), The Social Psychology of Consumer Behaviour.Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
5.
BergerJonah (2011), “Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information,”Psychological Science, 22 (7), 891–93.
6.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
7.
BergerJonah and MilkmanKatherine L. (2012), “What Makes Online Content Viral?”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (April), 192–205.
8.
BergerJonah and SchwartzEric (2011), “What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth?”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (October), 869–80.
9.
CacioppoJohn T. and PettyRichard E. (1981), “Social Psychological Procedures for Cognitive Response Assessment: The Thought-Listing Technique,” in Cognitive Assessment, MerluzziT.V., GlassC.R., and GenestM., eds. New York: Guilford Press, 309–42.
10.
CampbellMargaret C. (1995), “When Attention-Getting Advertising Tactics Elicit Consumer Inferences of Manipulative Intent: The Importance of Balancing Benefits and Investments,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4 (3), 225–54.
11.
CampbellMargaret C. and KirmaniAmna (2000), “Consumers’ Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (1), 69–83.
12.
ChaikenShelly and TropeYaacov (1999), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology.New York: Guilford Press.
13.
ChandyRajesh K.TellisGerard J.MacInnisDeborah J. and ThaivanichPattana (2001), “What to Say When: Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (November), 399–414.
14.
ChevalierJudith A. and MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (August), 345–54.
DarkePeter R. and RitchieRobin J.B. (2007), “The Defensive Consumer: Advertising Deception, Defensive Processing, and Distrust,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (February), 114–27.
17.
De AngelisMatteoBonezziAndreaPelusoAlessandro M.RuckerDerek D. and CostabileMichele (2012), “On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (August), 551–63.
18.
DisatnikDavid and SivanLiron (2014), “The Multicollinearity Illusion in Moderated Regression Analysis,”Marketing Letters, 27 (2), 403–08.
19.
FransenMarieke L.VerleghPeeter W.J., KirmaniAmna, and SmitEdith G. (2015), “A Typology of Consumer Strategies for Resisting Advertising, and a Review of Mechanisms for Countering Them,”International Journal of Advertising, 34 (1), 6–16.
20.
HeathChipBellChris and SternbergEmily (2001), “Emotional Selection in Memes: The Case of Urban Legends,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (6), 1028–41.
IyengarRaghuramBulteChristoph Van Den, and ValenteThomas W. (2011), “Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion,”Marketing Science, 30 (2), 195–212.
23.
LabandDavid N. (1986), “Advertising as Information: An Empirical Note,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 68 (3), 517–21.
LovettMitchell J.PeresRenana and ShacharRon (2013), “On Brands and Word of Mouth,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (August), 427–44.
26.
MacInnisDeborah J.RaoAmbar G. and WeissAllen M. (2002), “Assessing When Increased Media Weight of Real-World Advertisements Helps Sales,”Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (November), 391–407.
27.
MittalBanwari (1995), “A Comparative Analysis of Four Scales of Consumer Involvement,”Psychology and Marketing, 12 (7), 663–82.
28.
MoldovanSaritGoldenbergJacob and ChattopadhyayAmitava (2011), “The Different Roles of Product Originality and Usefulness in Generating Word of Mouth,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28 (2), 109–19.
29.
MorwitzVicki G.SteckelJoel H. and GuptaAlok (2007), “When Do Purchase Intentions Predict Sales?”International Journal of Forecasting, 23 (3), 347–64.
30.
NelsonPhillip (1974), “Advertising as Information,”Journal of Political Economy, 82 (July/August), 729–54.
31.
ObermillerCarlSpangenbergEric and MacLachlanDouglas L. (2005), “Ad Skepticism: The Consequences of Disbelief,”Journal of Advertising, 34 (3), 7–17.
PhamMichel TuanGeuensMaggie and De PelsmackerPatrick (2013), “The Influence of Ad-Evoked Feelings on Brand Evaluations: Empirical Generalizations from Consumer Responses to More Than 1000 TV Commercials,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30 (4), 383–94.
34.
PietersRikWarlopLuk and WedelMichel (2002), “Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory,”Management Science, 48 (6), 765–81.
35.
PietersRik and WedelMichel (2004), “Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (April), 36–50.
36.
PreacherKristopher J.RuckerDerek D. and HayesAndrew F. (2007), “Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions,”Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42 (1), 185–227.
37.
RiméBernand (2009), “Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review,”Emotion Review, 1 (1), 60–85.
38.
RossiterJohn R. and PercyLarry (1997), Advertising Communications and Promotion Management, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
RumboJoseph D. (2002), “Consumer Resistance in a World of Advertising Clutter: The Case of Adbusters,”Psychology and Marketing, 19 (2), 127–48.
40.
RussellCristel Antonia (2002), “Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (3), 306–18.
41.
SanbonmatsuDavid M. and KardesFrank R. (1988), “The Effects of Physiological Arousal on Information Processing and Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (3), 379–85.
42.
SpillerStephen A.FitzsimonsGavan J.LynchJohn G. and McClellandGary H. (2013), “Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (April), 277–88.
43.
SmithRobert E.MacKenzieScott B.YangXiaojingBuchholzLaura M. and DarleyWilliam K. (2007), “Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising,”Marketing Science, 26 (6), 819–33.
44.
StephenAndrew T.SciandraMichael R. and InmanJeffrey J. (2015), “The Effects of Content Characteristics on Consumer Engagement with Branded Social Media Content on Facebook,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, Report No. 15–110.
45.
TeixeiraThales (2012), “The New Science of Viral Ads,”Harvard Business Review (March), 25–27.
46.
TrusovMichaelBucklinRandolph E. and PauwelsKoen (2009), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (September), 90–102.
47.
TuckerCatherine E. (2015), “The Reach and Persuasiveness of Viral Video Ads,”Marketing Science, 34 (2), 281–96.
YooChangjo and MacInnisDeborah (2005), “The Brand Attitude Formation Process of Emotional and Informational Ads,”Journal of Business Research, 58 (10), 1397–406.
51.
ZaichkowskyJudith Lynne (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (3), 341–52.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
