It is becoming increasingly easier for researchers and practitioners to collect eye-tracking data during online preference measurement tasks. The authors develop a dynamic discrete choice model of information search and choice under bounded rationality, which they calibrate using a combination of eye-tracking and choice data. Their model extends Gabaix et al.'s (2006) directed cognition model by capturing fatigue, proximity effects, and imperfect memory encoding and by estimating individual-level parameters and partworths within a likelihood-based hierarchical Bayesian framework. The authors show that modeling eye movements as the outcome of forward-looking utility maximization improves out-of-sample predictions, enables researchers and practitioners to use shorter questionnaires, and allows better discrimination between attributes.
AllenbyGreg M., AroraNeeraj, and GinterJames L. (1995), “Incorporating Prior Knowledge into the Analysis of Conjoint Studies,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32(May), 152–62.
2.
AssunçãoJoão L., and MeyerRobert J. (1993), “The Rational Effect of Price Promotions on Sales and Consumption,”Management Science, 39(5), 517–35.
3.
AtchadéYves F., and RosenthalJeffrey S. (2005), “On Adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms,”Bernoulli, 11(5), 815–28.
4.
CamererColin F., HoTeck-Hua, and ChongJuin-Kuan (2004), “A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 861–98.
5.
CeleuxGilles, ForbesFlorence, RobertChristian P., and Michael TitteringtonD. (2006), “Deviance Information Criteria for Missing Data Models,”Bayesian Analysis, 1(4), 651–73.
6.
ChandonPierre, Wesley HutchinsonJ., BradlowEric T., and YoungScott H. (2009), “Does In-Store Marketing Work? Effects of the Number and Position of Shelf Facings on Brand Attention and Evaluation at the Point of Purchase,”Journal of Marketing, 73(November), 1–17.
7.
ChingAndrew T., ImaiSusumu, IshiharaMasakazu, and JainNeelam (2012), “A Practitioner's Guide to Bayesian Estimation of Discrete Choice Dynamic Programming Models,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10(2), 1–46.
8.
ChintaguntaPradeep K., GoettlerRonald L., and KimMinki (2012), “New Drug Diffusion When Forward-Looking Physicians Learn from Patient Feedback and Detailing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49(December), 807–821.
9.
DingMin (2007), “An Incentive-Aligned Mechanism for Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44(May), 214–23.
10.
DingMin, GrewalRajdeep, and LiechtyJohn (2005), “Incentive-Aligned Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(February), 67–82.
11.
DubéJean-Pierre H., HitschGünter J., and JindalPranav (2012), “The Joint Identification of Utility and Discount Functions from Stated Choice Data: An Application to Durable Goods Adoption,” working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
GabaixXavier, LaibsonDavid, MolocheGuillermo, and WeinbergStephen (2006), “Costly Information Acquisition: Experimental Analysis of a Boundedly Rational Model,”American Economic Review, 96(4), 1043–68.
13.
GelmanAndrew, MengXiao-Li, and SternHal (1996), “Posterior Predictive Assessment of Model Fitness via Realized Discrepancies,”Statistica Sinica, 6(4), 733–59.
14.
GilbrideTimothy J., and AllenbyGreg M. (2004), “A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules,”Marketing Science, 23(3), 391–406.
15.
GilbrideTimothy J., and AllenbyGreg M. (2006), “Estimating Heterogeneous EBA and Economic Screening Rule Choice Models,”Marketing Science, 25(5), 494–509.
16.
GittinsJohn C. (1979), “Bandit Processes and Dynamic Allocation Indices,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 41(2), 148–77.
17.
HagertyMichael R., and AakerDavid A. (1984), “A Normative Model of Consumer Information Processing,”Marketing Science, 3(3), 227–46.
18.
HartmannWesley R., and NairHarikesh S. (2010), “Retail Competition and the Dynamics of Demand for Tied Goods,”Marketing Science, 29(2), 366–86.
19.
HauserJohn R., UrbanGlen L., and WeinbergBruce D. (1993), “How Consumers Allocate Their Time When Searching for Information,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30(November), 452–66.
20.
HuangGuofang, KhwajaAhmed, and SudhirK. (2012), “Short Run Needs and Long Term Goals: A Dynamic Model of Thirst Management,” working paper, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
21.
HutchinsonJ. Wesley, and MeyerRobert J. (1994), “Dynamic Decision Making: Optimal Policies and Actual Behavior in Sequential Choice Problems,”Marketing Letters, 5(4), 369–82.
22.
JedidiKamel, and KohliRajeev (2005), “Probabilistic Subset-Conjunctive Models for Heterogeneous Consumers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(November), 483–94.
23.
JedidiKamel, and KohliRajeev (2008), “Inferring Latent Class Lexicographic Rules from Choice Data,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(4), 241–49.
24.
JohnsonEric J., MeyerRobert J., and GhoseSanjoy (1989), “When Choice Models Fail: Compensatory Models in Negatively Correlated Environments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 255–70.
25.
LiechtyJohn, PietersRik, and WedelMichel (2003), “Global and Local Covert Visual Attention: Evidence from a Bayesian Hidden Markov Model,”Psychometrika, 68(4), 519–41.
26.
MeyerRobert J. (1982), “A Descriptive Model of Consumer Information Search Behavior,”Marketing Science, 1(1), 93–121.
27.
MisraSanjog, and NairHarikesh S. (2011), “A Structural Model of Sales-Force Compensation Dynamics: Estimation and Field Implementation,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 9(3), 211–57.
28.
MusalemAndres, MeißnerMartin, and HuberJoel (2013), “Do Motivated and Incidental Processing Distort Conjoint Choices?” working paper, Duke University.
29.
PayneJohn W., BettmanJames R., and JohnsonEric J. (1988), “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534–52.
30.
PayneJohn W., BettmanJames R., and JohnsonEric J. (1992), “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective,”Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 87–131.
31.
PayneJohn W., BettmanJames R., and JohnsonEric J. (1993), The Adaptive Decision Maker.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PietersRik, RosbergenEdward, and WedelMichel (1999), “Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scan-path Theory,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(November), 424–38.
33.
PietersRik, and WarlopLuk (1999), “Visual Attention During Brand Choice: The Impact of Time Pressure and Task Motivation,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(1), 1–16.
34.
PietersRik, WarlopLuk, and WedelMichel (2002), “Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory,”Management Science, 48(6), 765–81.
35.
PietersRik, and WedelMichel (2004), “Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects,”Journal of Marketing, 68(April), 36–50.
RosbergenEdward, PietersRik, and WedelMichel (1997), “Visual Attention to Advertising: A Segment-Level Analysis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 305–314.
38.
RustJohn (1987), “Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold Zurcher,”Econometrica, 55(5), 999–1033.
39.
ShiSavannah Wei, WedelMichel, and (Rik) PietersF.G.M. (2013), “Information Acquisition During Online Decision Making: A Model-Based Exploration Using Eye-Tracking Data,”Management Science, 59(5), 1009–1026.
40.
SimonHerbert A. (1955), “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
41.
StüttgenPeter, BoatwrightPeter, and MonroeRobert T. (2012), “A Satisficing Choice Model,”Marketing Science, 31(6), 878–99.
42.
TeixeiraThales, WedelMichel, and PietersRik (2012), “Emotion-Induced Engagement in Internet Video Advertisements,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49(April), 144–59.
43.
ToubiaOlivier, de JongMartijn G., StiegerDaniel, and FüllerJohann (2012), “Measuring Consumer Preferences Using Conjoint Poker,”Marketing Science, 31(1), 138–56.
44.
ToubiaOlivier, and StephenAndrew T. (2013), “Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?”Marketing Science, 32(3), 368–92.
45.
TverskyAmos, SattathShmuel, and SlovicPaul (1988), “Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice,”Psychological Review, 95(3), 371–84.
46.
Van der LansRalf, PietersRik, and WedelMichel (2008a), “Competitive Brand Salience,”Marketing Science, 27(5), 922–31.
47.
Van der LansRalf, PietersRik, and WedelMichel (2008b), “Eye-Movement Analysis of Search Effectiveness,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(482), 452–61.
48.
Van der LansMichel Wedel, and PietersRik (2011), “Defining Eye-Fixation Sequences Across Individuals and Tasks: The Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) Algorithm,”Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 239–57.
49.
WedelMichel, and PietersRik (2000), “Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings,”Marketing Science, 19(4), 297–312.
50.
WedelMichel, and PietersRik (2008), Eye Tracking for Visual Marketing.Delft, The Netherlands: Now Publishers.
51.
WedelMichel, and PietersRik, and LiechtyJohn (2008), “Attention Switching During Scene Perception: How Goals Influence the Time Course of Eye Movements Across Advertisements,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(2), 129–38.
52.
WeitzmanMartin L. (1979), “Optimal Search for the Best Alternative,”Econometrica, 47(3), 641–54.
53.
YaoSong, and MelaCarl F. (2011), “A Dynamic Model of Sponsored Search Advertising,”Marketing Science, 30(3), 447–68.
54.
YeeMichael, DahanEly, HauserJohn R., and OrlinJames (2007), “Greedoid-Based Noncompensatory Inference,”Marketing Science, 26(4), 532–49.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
