People often use price as a proxy for quality, resulting in a positive correlation between prices and product liking, known as the “price– quality” (P–Q) heuristic. Using data from three experiments conducted at a winery, this article offers a more complex and complete reference-dependent model of the relationship between price and quality. The authors propose that higher prices set higher expectations, which serve as reference points. When expectations are met or exceeded, we observe the familiar P–Q relationship. However, when price is high and quality is relatively low, the product falls short of consumers’ reference point and the P–Q relationship is reversed; thus, people evaluate a low-quality product with a high price more negatively than a low-quality product with a low price. Using the results of a field experiment, the authors discuss implications for pricing considerations and profitability.
AakerDavid A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name.New York: The Free Press.
2.
AbdellaouiMohammed, BleichrodtHan, and ParaschivCorina (2007), “Measuring Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Approach,”Management Science, 53(10), 1659–74.
3.
AbelerJohannes, FalkArmin, GoetteLorenz, and HuffmanDavid (2011), “Reference Points and Effort Provision,”American Economic Review, 101(2), 470–92.
4.
AllisonRalph I., and UhlKenneth P. (1964), “Influence of Beer Brand Identification on Taste Perception,”Journal of Marketing Research, 1(August), 36–39.
5.
AlmenbergJohan, and DreberAnna (2011), “When Does the Price Affect the Taste? Results from a Wine Experiment,”Journal of Wine Economics, 6(1), 110–21.
6.
BellDavid E. (1985), “Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty,”Operations Research, 33(1), 1–27.
7.
BroniarczykSusan M., and AlbaJoseph W. (1994), “Theory Versus Data in Prediction and Correlation Tasks,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(1), 117–39.
8.
DiehlKristin, and PoynorCait (2010), “Great Expectations?! Assortment Size, Expectations and Satisfaction,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(April), 312–22.
9.
GerstnerEitan (1985), “Do Higher Prices Signal Higher Quality?”Journal of Marketing Research, 22(May), 209–215.
10.
GoldsteinRobin, AlmenbergJohan, DreberAnna, EmersonJohn W., HerschkowitschAlexis, and KatzJacob (2008), “Do More Expensive Wines Taste Better? Evidence from a Large Sample of Blind Tastings,”Journal of Wine Economics, 3(1), 1–9.
11.
GulFaruk (1991), “A Theory of Disappointment Aversion,”Econometrica, 59(3), 667–86.
12.
HeffetzOri, and ListJohn A. (2011), “Is the Endowment Effect a Reference Effect?” NBER Working Paper No. w16715.
13.
HeffetzOri, and ShayoMoses (2009), “How Large Are Non-Budget-Constraint Effects of Prices on Demand?”American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 170–99.
14.
HochSteve J., and DeightonJohn (1989), “Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience,”Journal of Marketing, 53(April), 1–20.
15.
HseeChristopher K. (1996), “The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 247–57.
16.
HseeChristopher K., LoewensteinGeorge, BlountSally, and BazermanMax (1999), “Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluation of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis,”Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 576–90.
17.
HuberJoel, and McCannJohn (1982), “The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19(August), 324–33.
18.
JaniszewskiChris, and Van OsselaerStijn M.J. (2000), “A Connectionist Model of Brand–Quality Associations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37(August), 331–50.
19.
KahnemanDaniel, and TverskyAmos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica, 47(2), 39–60.
20.
KoszegiBotond, and RabinMathew (2006), “A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1221(4), 1133–65.
21.
LeclercFrance, SchmittBernd H., and DubéLaurette (1994), “Foreign Branding and Its Effects on Product Perceptions and Attitudes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 31(May), 263–70.
22.
LoomesGraham, and SugdenRobert (1986), “Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice Under Uncertainty,”Review of Economic Studies, 53(2), 271–82.
23.
McClureSamuel M., LiJiam, TomlinDamon, CypertKim S., MontagueLatané M., and Read MontagueP. (2004), “Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks,”Neuron, 44(2), 379–87.
24.
OliverRichard L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 460–69.
25.
PechmannCornelia, and RatneshwarS. (1992), “Consumer Covariation Judgments: Theory or Data Driven?”Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 373–86.
26.
PlassmannHilke, O'DohertyJohn, ShivBaba, and RangelAntonio (2008), “Marketing Actions Can Modulate Neural Representations of Experienced Pleasantness,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, LeslieG. Ungerleider, ed. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1050–54.
27.
RaghubirPriya (1998), “Coupon Value: A Signal for Price?”Journal of Marketing Research, 35(August), 316–24.
28.
RaoAkashay R., and MonroeKent B. (1989), “The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(August), 351–57.
29.
RieszPeter C. (1979), “Price-Quality Correlations for Packaged Food Products,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 13(2), 236–47.
30.
SherifCarolyn W. (1963), “Social Categorization as a Function of Latitude of Acceptance and Series Range,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(2), 148–56.
31.
SherifMuzafer, and HovlandCarl (1961), Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
ShivBaba, CarmonZiv, and ArielyDan (2005), “Placebo Effects of Marketing Actions: Consumers May Get What They Pay For,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(November), 383–93.
33.
SprengRichard A., MacKenzieScott B., and OlshavskyRichard W. (1996), “A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction,”Journal of Marketing, 60(July), 15–32.
34.
SprengerCharles (2011), “An Endowment Effect for Risk: Experimental Tests of Stochastic Reference Points,” working paper, Stanford University.
35.
TverskyAmos, and KahnemanDaniel (1981), “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,”Science, 211(4481), 453–58.
36.
WouterVanhouche, and van OsselaerStijn M.J. (2009), “The Accuracy Enhancing Effect of Biasing Cues,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 317–27.
37.
WaberRebecca L., ShivBaba, CarmonZiv, and ArielyDan (2008), “Commercial Features of Placebo and Therapeutic Efficacy,”JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(9), 1016–17.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
