With the growing popularity of online social networks, it is becoming more important for marketing researchers to understand and measure social intercorrelations among consumers. The authors show that the estimation of consumers' social intercorrelations can be significantly affected by the sampling method used in the study and the topology of the social network. Through a series of simulation studies using a spatial model, the authors find that the magnitude of social intercorrelations in consumer networks tends to be underestimated if samples of the networks are used (rather than using the entire population of the network). The authors further demonstrate that sampling methods that better preserve the network structure perform best in recovering the social intercorrelations. However, this advantage decreases in networks characterized by the scale-free power-law distribution for the number of connections of each member. The authors discuss the insights they glean from these findings and propose a method to obtain unbiased estimation of the magnitude of social intercorrelations.
AndersonTed W., and DarlingD.A. (1952), “Asymptotic Theory of Certain ‘Goodness-of-Fit’ Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23 (2), 193–212.
2.
AravindakshanAshwin, PetersKay, and PrasadA. Naik (2012), “Spatiotemporal Allocation of Advertising Budgets,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (February), 1–14.
3.
BarabásiAlbert-László, and AlbertRéka (1999), “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks,”Science, 286 (5439), 509–512.
4.
BlumeLawrence E., and StevenN. Durlauf (2006), “Identifying Social Interactions: A Review,” in Methods in Social Epidemiology, OakesJ. Michael, and JayS. Kaufman, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 287–315.
BronnenbergBart J. (2005), “Spatial Models in Marketing Research and Practice,”Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 21 (4/5), 335–43.
7.
BronnenbergBart J., and MahajanVijay (2001), “Unobserved Retailer Behavior in Multimarket Data: Joint Spatial Dependence in Marketing Shares and Promotion Variables,”Marketing Science, 20 (3), 284–99.
8.
BronnenbergBart J., and SismeiroCatarina (2002), “Using Multimarket Data to Predict Brand Performance in Markets for Which No or Poor Data Exist,”Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (February), 1–17.
9.
CostenbaderElizabeth, and ThomasW. Valente (2003), “The Stability of Centrality Measures When Networks Are Sampled,”Social Networks, 25 (4), 283–307.
10.
De ChoudhuryMunmun, LinYu-Ru, Hari SundaramK., CandanSelcuk, XieLexing, and KelliherAisling (2010), “How Does the Data Sampling Strategy Impact the Discovery of Information Diffusion in Social Media?” in Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 34–41.
11.
EbbesPeter, HuangZan, and RangaswamyArvind (2011), “Subgraph Sampling Methods for Social Networks: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” working paper, Department of Marketing, HEC Paris.
12.
FrankOve (1978), “Sampling and Estimation in Large Social Networks,”Social Network, 1 (1), 91–101.
13.
FrankOve (2005), “Network Sampling and Model Fitting,” in Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, PeterJ. Carrington, ScottJohn, and WassermanStanley, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 31–56.
14.
FrenzenJonathan K., and HarryL. Davis (1990), “Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (June), 1–12.
15.
GalaskiewiczJoseph (1991), “Estimating Point Centrality Using Different Network Sampling Techniques,”Social Networks, 13 (4), 347–86.
16.
GoodmanLeo A. (1961), “Snowball Sampling,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32 (1), 148–70.
17.
GranovetterMark (1976), “Network Sampling: Some First Steps,”American Journal of Sociology, 81 (6), 1287–1303.
18.
HandcockMark S., and KristaJ. Gile (2010), “Modeling Networks from Sampled Data,”Annals of Applied Statistics, 4 (1), 5–25.
19.
HanssensDominique M., LeonardJ. Parsons, and RandallL. Schultz (2001), Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis, 2d ed. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20.
HartmannWesley R. (2010), “Demand Estimation with Social Interactions and the Implications for Targeted Marketing,”Marketing Science, 29 (4), 585–601.
21.
HartmannWesley R., ManchandaPuneet, NairHarikesh, BothnerMatthew, DoddsPeter, GodesDavid (2008), “Modeling Social Interactions: Identification, Empirical Methods, and Policy Implications,”Marketing Letters, 19 (3), 287–304.
22.
HenryPaul C. (2005), “Social Class, Market Situation, and Consumers' Metaphors of (Dis)Empowerment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (March), 766–78.
23.
HolmePetter, and KimBeom Jun (2002), “Growing Scale-Free Networks with Tunable Clustering,”Physical Review, 65 (2), 1–4.
24.
JohnsonJeffrey C, JamesS. Boster, and HolbertDonald (1989), “Estimating Relational Attributes from Snowball Samples Through Simulation,”Social Networks, 11 (2), 135–58.
25.
KatonaZsolt, and SarvaryMiklos (2007), “Network Formation and the Structure of the Commercial World Wide Web,”Marketing Science, 27 (5), 764–78.
26.
KossinetsGueorgi (2006), “Effects of Missing Data in Social Networks,”Social Networks, 28 (3), 247–68.
27.
LeSageJames P. (2000), “Bayesian Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Spatial Autoregressive Models,”Geographical Analysis, 32 (1), 19–35.
28.
LeskovecJure, and FaloutsosChristos (2006), “Sampling from Large Graphs,” in Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 631–36.
29.
LeskovecJure, KleinbergJon, and FaloutsosChristos (2005), “Graphs Over Time: Densification Laws, Shrinking Diameters and Possible Explanations,” in Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining.New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 177–87.
30.
ManskiCharles F. (1993), “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem,”Review of Economic Studies, 60 (3), 531–42.
31.
NairHarikesh S., ManchandaPuneet, and BhatiaTulikaa (2010), “Asymmetric Social Interactions in Physician Prescription Behavior: The Role of Opinion Leaders,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (October), 883–95.
32.
NarayanVishal, and YangSha (2007), “Modeling the Formation of Dyadic Relationships Between Consumers in Online Communities,” working paper, Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management, New York University.
33.
SalganikMatthew J., and DouglasD. Heckathorn (2004), “Sampling and Estimation in Hidden Populations Using Respondent-Driven Sampling,”Sociological Methodology, 34 (1), 193–239.
34.
ShaikhNazrul I., RangaswamyArvind, and BalakrishnanAnant (2005), “Modeling the Diffusion of Innovations Using Small-World Networks,” working paper, Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University.
35.
SnijdersTom A.B. (1992), “Estimation on the Basis of Snowball Samples: How to Weight,”Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 36 (September), 59–70.
36.
TepperKelly (1994), “The Role of Labeling Processes in Elderly Consumers' Responses to Age Segmentation Cues,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (March), 503–519.
37.
ThompsonSteven K., and LindaM. Collins (2002), “Adaptive Sampling in Research on Risk-Related Behaviors,”Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68 (November), S57–S67.
38.
ThompsonSteven K., and FrankOve (2000), “Model-Based Estimation with Link-Tracing Sampling Designs,”Survey Methodology, 26 (1), 87–98.
39.
Van Den BulteChristophe, and WuytsStefan (2007), Social Networks and Marketing.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
40.
WattsDuncan J., and StevenH. Strogatz (1998), “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks,”Nature, 393 (4 June), 440–42.
41.
YangSha, and GregM. Allenby (2003), “Modeling Interdependent Consumer Preferences,”Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (August), 282–94.
42.
YangSha, NarayanVishal, and AssaelHenry (2006), “Estimating the Interdependence of Television Program Viewership Between Spouses: A Bayesian Simultaneous Equation Model,”Marketing Science, 25 (4), 336–49.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
