Companies increasingly employ cause-related marketing to enhance customer goodwill and improve their image. However, because these efforts have major implications for pricing strategy and firm profitability, understanding the relationship between the company's donation amount and customers’ willingness to pay is important. In particular, little is known about the moderating effects that influence this relationship or their underlying mechanisms. Study 1 confirms that two types of customer predispositions moderate the link between donation amount and willingness to pay: donation-related and cause-related predispositions. Three additional studies focus on the negative moderating effect of company–cause fit and provide insights into the underlying moderation process. Specifically, the motives customers attribute to the company mediate the moderating impact of fit on the donation amount–WTP link (Study 2), which occurs particularly in cases of utilitarian (Study 3) and privately consumed products (Study 4).
AndreoniJames (1989), “Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence,”Journal of Political Economy, 97 (6), 1447–58.
2.
AndreoniJames, and MillerJohn (2002), “Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism,”Econometrica, 70 (2), 737–53.
3.
AroraNeeraj, and HendersonTy (2007), “Embedded Premium Promotion: Why It Works and How to Make It More Effective,”Marketing Science, 26 (4), 514–31.
4.
AtkinsonJohn W. (1964), An Introduction to Motivation.Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
5.
BaroneMichael J., AndrewT. Norman, and AnthonyD. Miyazaki (2007), “Consumer Response to Retailer Use of Cause-Related Marketing: Is More Fit Better?”Journal of Retailing, 83 (4), 437–45.
6.
BeardenWilliam O., RichardG. Netemeyer, and JesseE. Teel (1989), “Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (4), 473–81.
7.
BeckerGordon M., MorrisH. DeGroot, and MarschakJacob (1964), “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method,”Behavioral Science,9 (3), 226–32.
8.
Becker-OlsenKaren L., CudmoreB. Andrew, and RonaldP. Hill (2006), “The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Business Research, 59 (1), 46–53.
9.
BhattacharyaC.B., and SenSankar (2004), “Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives,”California Management Review, 47 (1), 9–24.
10.
ChangChun-Tuan (2008), “To Donate or Not to Donate? Product Characteristics and Framing Effects of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Purchase Behavior,”Psychology & Marketing, 25 (12), 1089–1110.
CrumplerHeidi, and PhilipJ. Grossman (2008), “An Experimental Test of Warm Glow Giving,”Journal of Public Economics, 92 (5/6), 1011–1021.
13.
DahlDarren W., and AnneM. Lavack (1995), “Cause-Related Marketing: Impact of Size of Corporate Donation and Size of Cause-Related Promotion on Consumer Perceptions and Participation,” in AMA Winter Educators’ Proceedings, Vol. 6, DavidW. Stewart, and NaufelJ. Vilcassim, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association,476–81.
14.
DharRavi, and WertenbrochKlaus (2000), “Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (February), 60–71.
15.
EcclesJacquelynne S., and WigfieldAllan (2002), “Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals,”Annual Review of Psychology, 53 (1), 109–132.
16.
ElfenbeinDaniel W., and McManusBrian (2010), “A Greater Price for a Greater Good? Evidence That Consumers Pay More for Charity-Linked Products,”American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2 (2), 28–60.
17.
EllenPam Scholder, DeborahJ. Webb, and LoisA. Mohr (2006), “Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 147–57.
18.
FolseJudith A. Garretson, RonaldW. Niedrich, and StacyL. Grau (2010), “Cause-Relating Marketing: The Effects of Purchase Quantity and Firm Donation Amount on Consumer Inferences and Participation Intentions,”Journal of Retailing, 86 (4), 295–309.
19.
GlazerAmihai, and KaiA. Konrad (1996), “A Signaling Explanation for Charity,”American Economic Review, 86 (4), 1019–1028.
20.
GrauStacy L., and JudithA., FolseGarretson (2007), “Cause-Related Marketing (CRM),”Journal of Advertising, 36 (4), 19–33.
21.
GuptaShruti, and PirschJulie (2006), “The Company-Cause-Customer Fit Decision in Cause-Related Marketing,”Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23 (6), 314–26.
22.
HarbaughWilliam T. (1998), “What Do Donations Buy? A Model of Philanthropy Based on Prestige and Warm Glow,”Journal of Public Economics, 67 (2), 269–84.
23.
HaruvyErnan, and PeterT., LeszczycPopkowski (2009), “Bidder Motives in Cause-Related Auctions,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26 (4), 324–31.
24.
HendersonTy, and AroraNeeraj (2010), “Promoting Brands Across Categories with a Social Cause: Implementing Effective Embedded Premium Programs,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (November), 41–60.
25.
HeusslerTobias, HuberFrank, MeyerFrederik, VollhardtKai, and AhlertDieter (2009), “Moderating Effects of Emotion on the Perceived Fairness of Price Increases,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 36, AnnL. McGill, and ShavittSharon, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research,332–38.
26.
HomburgChristian, KoschateNicole, and WayneD. Hoyer (2005), “Do Satisfied Customers Really Pay More? A Study of the Relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (April), 84–96.
27.
IEG (2009), “Cause Marketing Sponsorship Spending on Causes to Total $1.55 Billion This Year,” IEG Sponsorship Report, (accessed October 5, 2011), [available at http:/www.sponsorship.com/IEGSR].
28.
IsaacR. Mark, PevnitskayaSvetlana, and TimothyC. Salmon (2010), “Do Preferences for Charitable Giving Help Auctioneers?”Experimental Economics, 13 (1), 14–44.
29.
IsenAlice M. (2000), “Some Perspectives on Positive Affect and Self-Regulation,”Psychological Inquiry, 11 (3), 184–87.
30.
KrishnaAradhna (1991), “Effect of Dealing Patterns on Consumer Perceptions of Deal Frequency and Willingness to Pay,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (November), 441–51.
31.
KrishnaAradhna (2011), “Can Supporting a Cause Decrease Donations and Happiness? The Cause Marketing Paradox,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (July), 338–45.
32.
KrishnaAradhna, and RajanUday (2009), “Cause Marketing: Spillover Effects of Cause-Related Products in a Product Portfolio,”Marketing Science, 55 (9), 1469–85.
33.
KulviwatSongpol, GordonC. Bruner, and Al-ShuridahObaid (2009), “The Role of Social Influence on Adoption of High Tech Innovations: The Moderating Effect of Public/Private Consumption,”Journal of Business Research, 62 (7), 706–712.
34.
LaffertyBarbara A., RonaldE. Goldsmith, and HultG. Tomas M. (2004), “The Impact of the Alliance on the Partners: A Look at Cause-Brand Alliances,”Psychology & Marketing, 21 (7), 509–531.
35.
LearyMark R., and RobinM. Kowalski (1990), “Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model,”Psychological Bulletin, 107 (1), 34–47.
36.
LichtensteinDonald R., MinetteE. Drumwright, and BridgetteM. Braig (2004), “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 16–32.
37.
MayoJohn W., and CatherineH. Tinsley (2009), “Warm Glow and Charitable Giving: Why the Wealthy Do Not Give More to Charity,”Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (3), 490–99.
38.
MullerDominique, CharlesM. Judd, and VincentY. Yzerbyt (2005), “When Moderation Is Mediated and Mediation Is Moderated,”Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89 (6), 852–63.
39.
NanXiaoli, and HeoKwangjun (2007), “Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives,”Journal of Advertising, 36 (2), 63–74.
40.
NewtsonDarren (1974), “Dispositional Inference from Effects of Actions: Effects Chosen and Effects Foregone,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10 (5), 489–96.
41.
NunnallyJum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
OkadaErica M. (2005), “Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (February), 43–53.
43.
LeszczycPopkowski, PeterT., and MichaelH. Rothkopf (2010), “Charitable Motives and Bidding in Charity Auctions,”Management Science, 56 (3), 399–413.
44.
LeszczycPopkowski, PeterT., and LeoT. Wong (2010), “The Effectiveness of Donation Promises in Charity Auctions as a Cause-Related Marketing Strategy,” working paper, Department of Marketing, Business Economics & Law, University of Alberta.
45.
PracejusJohn W., and Douglas OlsenG. (2004), “The Role of Brand/Cause Fit in the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns,”Journal of Business Research, 57 (6), 635–40.
46.
PracejusJohn W., OlsenG. Douglas, and NormanR. Brown (2003), “On the Prevalence and Impact of Vague Quantifiers in the Advertising of Cause-Related Marketing (CRM),”Journal of Advertising, 32 (4), 19–28.
47.
RatnerRebecca K., and BarbaraE. Kahn (2002), “The Impact of Private Versus Public Consumption on Variety-Seeking Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2), 246–57.
48.
RomanoRichard, and YildirimHuseyin (2001), “Why Charities Announce Donations: A Positive Perspective,”Journal of Public Economics, 81 (3), 423–47.
49.
SimmonsCarolyn J., and KarenL. Becker-Olsen (2006), “Achieving Marketing Objectives Through Social Sponsorships,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (October), 154–69.
50.
SobelMichael E. (1982), “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models,” in Sociological Methodology, LeinhartSamuel, ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,290–312.
51.
StrahilevitzMichal (1999), “The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-Linked Brand,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8 (3), 215–41.
52.
StrahilevitzMichal, and JohnG. Myers (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 434–47.
53.
TauteHarry, and McQuittyShaun (2004), “Feeling Good! Doing Good! An Exploratory Look at the Impulsive Purchase of the Social Good,”Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 12 (2), 16–27.
54.
VaradarajanP. Rajan, and MenonAnil (1988), “Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy,”Journal of Marketing, 52 (July), 58–74.
55.
ViderasJulio R., and AnnL. Owen (2006), “Public Goods Provision and Weil-Being: Empirical Evidence Consistent with the Warm Glow Theory,”B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy: Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 5 (1), 1–40.
56.
WakefieldKirk L., and Jeffrey InmanJ. (2003), “Situational Price Sensitivity: The Role of Consumption Occasion, Social Context and Income,”Journal of Retailing, 79 (4), 199–212.
57.
WebbDeborah J., CorlissL. Green, and ThomasG. Brashear (2000), “Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 299–309.
58.
WertenbrochKlaus, and SkieraBernd (2002), “Measuring Consumers’ Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase,”Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (May), 228–41.
59.
WinterichKaren P., and MichaelJ. Barone (2011), “Warm Glow or Cold, Hard Cash? Social Identity Effects on Consumer Choice for Donation Versus Discount Promotion,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (October), 855–68.
60.
ZhaoMin, HoefflerSteve, and ZaubermanGal (2011), “Mental Simulation and Product Evaluation: The Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of Process versus Outcome Simulation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (October), 827–39.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
