How do consumers adjust their spending when their budget changes? A common view is that the allocation of one's current budget should not depend on previous budget allocations. Contrary to this, the authors find that when the budget contracts to a particular level, consumers select less variety (as measured by the number of different items with some of the budget allocated to them) than when their budget expands to that same level. This budget contraction effect stems from a reduction in variety under the contracting budget, not from variety expansion under the expanding budget. Evidence from five experiments indicates that the effect is driven by a desire to avoid feelings of loss associated with spreading allocation cuts (relative to reference quantities from previous allocations) across many items.
ArielyDan, HuberJoel, and WertenbrochKlaus (2005), “When Do Losses Loom Larger Than Gains?”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(May), 134–38.
2.
BanksJames, BlundellRichard, and TannerSarah (1998), “Is There a Retirement-Savings Puzzle?”American Economic Review, 88(4), 769–88.
3.
BarsalouLawrence W. (1983), “Ad Hoc Categories,”Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–27.
4.
BernheimB. Douglas, SkinnerJonathan, and WeinbergSteven (2001), “What Accounts for the Variation in Retirement Wealth Among U.S. Households?”American Economic Review, 91(4), 832–57.
5.
BlanchardSimon J., and DeSarboWayne S. (2013), “A New Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Methodology for Latent Category Identification,”Psychometrika, 78(2), 322–40.
6.
BowmanDavid, MinehartDebby, and RabinMatthew (1993), “Loss Aversion in a Savings Model,” Working Paper No. 93–212, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley.
7.
CoombsClyde H., DawesRobyn M., and TverskyAmos (1970), Mathematical Psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
DargayJoyce M. (2001), “The Effect of Income on Car Ownership: Evidence of Asymmetry,”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(9), 807–821.
9.
FaisonEdmund W.J. (1977), “The Neglected Variety Drive,”Journal of Consumer Research, 4(3), 172–75.
10.
GeierAndrew B., RozinPaul, and DorosGheorghe (2006), “Unit Bias a New Heuristic That Helps Explain the Effect of Portion Size on Food Intake,”Psychological Science, 17(6), 521–25.
11.
HallRobert E. (1979), “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence,” NBER Working Paper No. R0015.
12.
HallRobert E., and MishkinFrederic S. (1982), “The Sensitivity of Consumption to Transitory Income: Estimates from Panel Data on Households,” NBER Working Paper No. 505.
13.
HardieBruce G.S., JohnsonEric J., and FaderPeter S. (1993), “Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice,”Marketing Science, 12(4), 378–94.
14.
JappelliTullio, and PistaferriLuigi (2010), “The Consumption Response to Income Changes,” NBER Working Paper No. 15739.
15.
JohnsonEric J., and MeyerRobert J. (1984), “Compensatory Choice Models of Noncompensatory Processes: The Effect of Varying Context,”Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 528–41.
16.
KahnBarbara E., and RatnerRebecca (2005), “Variety for the Sake of Variety? Diversification Motives in Consumer Choice,” in Inside Consumption: Frontiers of Research on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires, RatneshwarS., and MickDavid Glen, eds. London: Routledge, 1–34.
17.
KahnemanDaniel, and ThalerRichard (2006), “Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 221–34.
18.
KahnemanDaniel, and TverskyAmos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica, 47(2), 263–91.
19.
KahnemanDaniel, and TverskyAmos (1984), “Choices, Values, and Frames,”American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–50.
20.
KalyanaramGurumurthy, and WinerRussell S. (1995), “Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research,”Marketing Science, 14(3), G161–69.
21.
KamakuraWagner A., and DuRex Yuxing (2012), “How Economic Contractions and Expansions Affect Expenditure Patterns,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 229–47.
22.
LattinJames M., and BucklinRandolph E. (1989), “Reference Effects of Price and Promotion on Brand Choice Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 299–310.
23.
LoewensteinGeorge, O'DonoghueTed, and RabinMatthew (2003), “Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1209–1248.
24.
LynchJohn G.Jr., NetemeyerRichard G., SpillerStephen A., and ZammitAlessandra (2010), “A Generalizable Scale of Propensity to Plan: The Long and the Short of Planning for Time and for Money,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 108–128.
25.
McAlisterLeigh (1982), “A Dynamic Attribute Satiation Model of Variety-Seeking Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 141–50.
26.
McGrawA. Peter, LarsenJeff T., KahnemanDaniel, and SchkadeDavid (2010), “Comparing Gains and Losses,”Psychological Science, 21(10), 1438–45.
27.
MellersBarbara A., and Peter McGrawA. (2001), “Anticipated Emotions as Guides to Choice,”Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 210–14.
28.
MitchellDeborah J., KahnBarbara E., and KnaskoSusan C. (1995), “There's Something in the Air: Effects of Congruent or Incongruent Ambient Odor on Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 229–38.
29.
MogilnerCassie, and AakerJennifer (2009), “The Time vs. Money Effect: Shifting Product Attitudes and Decisions Through Personal Connection,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 277–91.
30.
NovemskyNathan, and KahnemanDaniel (2005), “The Boundaries of Loss Aversion,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(May), 119–28.
31.
OkadaErica M., and HochStephen J. (2004), “Spending Time Versus Spending Money,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 313–23.
32.
OliverRichard L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 460–69.
33.
PayneJohn W., BettmanJames R., and JohnsonEric J. (1993), The Adaptive Decision Maker.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
RatneshwarS., and ChaikenShelly (1991), “Comprehension's Role in Persuasion: The Case of Its Moderating Effect on the Persuasive Impact of Source Cues,”Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 52–62.
35.
RatneshwarS., PechmannCornelia, and ShockerAllan D. (1996), “Goal-Derived Categories and the Antecedents of Across-Category Consideration,”Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 240–50.
36.
RuhmChristopher J. (1991), “Are Workers Permanently Scarred by Job Displacements?”American Economic Review, 81(1), 319–24.
37.
RussoJ. Edward, and CarlsonKurt A. (2002), “Individual Decision Making,” in Handbook of Marketing, BartonA. Weitz, and WensleyRobin, eds. London: Sage Publications, 371–408.
38.
SainiRitesh, and MongaAshwani (2008), “How I Decide Depends on What I Spend: Use of Heuristics Is Greater for Time Than for Money,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 914–22.
39.
SheaJohn (1995a), “Myopia, Liquidity Constraints, and Aggregate Consumption: A Simple Test,”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(3), 798–805.
40.
SheaJohn (1995b), “Union Contracts and the Life-Cycle/Permanent-Income Hypothesis,”American Economic Review, 85(1), 186–200.
41.
SimonsonItamar (1990), “The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27(May), 150–62.
42.
SlovicPaul, GriffinDale, and TverskyAmos (1990), “Compatibility Effects in Judgment and Choice,” in Insights in Decision Making, RobinM. Hogarth, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 5–27.
43.
SoulelesNicholas S. (2000), “College Tuition and Household Savings and Consumption,”Journal of Public Economics, 77(2), 185–207.
44.
StephensAnn H. (1997), “Persistent Effects of Job Displacement: The Importance of Multiple Job Losses,”Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), 165–88.
45.
StephensMelvin (2001), “The Long-Run Consumption Effects of Earnings Shocks,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(1), 28–36.
46.
TaylorPaul, MorinRich, KochharRakesh, ParkerKim, CohnD'Vera, LopezMark Hugo (2010), “A Balance Sheet at 30 Months: How the Great Recession Has Changed Life in America,” Pew Research Center, A Social and Demographic Trends Report (June 30).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
