Spending on political advertising has grown dramatically in recent years, and political campaigns have increasingly adopted the language and techniques of marketing. As such political marketing efforts proliferate, the factors that drive electoral success warrant greater attention and investigation. The authors employ a combination of laboratory studies and analysis of actual election results to reveal influences of candidate appearance and spending strategies in campaigns. They analyze how personality trait inferences based on candidate appearance interact with political party brand image, advertising spending, and negative advertising. The results indicate that appearance-based inferences about candidates influence election outcomes, but their impact is driven partially by trait associations at the party brand level. This interaction between appearance and party alters the effects of advertising spending, particularly the effects of negative advertising. The findings have implications for the marketing of political candidates in terms of their party's brand image.
AakerJennifer (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (August), 347–56.
2.
AlvarezMichael, and BrehmJohn (2002), Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information and American Public Opinion.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AnsolabehereStephen, and GerberAlan (1994), “The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections,”Journal of Politics, 56 (4), 1106–1118.
4.
AnsolabehereStephen, and IyengarShanto (1994), “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership Over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns,”The Public Opinion Quarterly, 58 (Autumn), 335–57.
5.
AschS. (1946), “Forming Impressions of Personality,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41 (3), 258–90.
6.
BaumerDonald, and GoldHoward (2007), “Party Images and Partisan Resurgence,”The Social Science Journal, 44 (3), 465–79.
7.
BrewerMark (2009), Party Image in the American Electorate.New York: Routledge.
DownsAnthony (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy.New York: HarperCollins.
14.
EkmanPaul (2004), “Happy, Sad, Angry, Disgusted,”New Scientist, 184 (2467), 4–5.
15.
EriksonRobert, and PalfreyThomas (1998), “Campaign Spending and Incumbency: An Alternative Simultaneous Equations Approach,”Journal of Politics, 60 (2), 355–73.
16.
FaberRonald A., TimsAlbert R., and SchmittKay G. (1993), “Negative Political Advertising and Voting Intent: The Role of Involvement and Alternative Information Sources,”Journal of Advertising, 22 (4), 67–76.
17.
FeldmanStanley (1988), “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values,”American Journal of Political Science, 32 (2), 416–40.
18.
FindlayChristie (2008), “Can This Brand Be Saved?”Politics, (September), 34–39.
19.
FiskeS., CuddyA., GlickP., and XuJ. (2002), “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Context: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (6), 878–902.
20.
FunkCarolyn L. (1996), “Understanding Trait Inferences in Candidate Images,”Research in Micropolitics, Vol. 5, Delli CarpiniMichael X., HuddyLeonie, Robert, and ShapiroY., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 97–123.
21.
FunkCarolyn L. (1999), “Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation,”Journal of Politics, 61 (3), 700–720.
22.
GelbBetsy D., and SorescuAlina B. (2000), “Republican Brands, Democrat Brands,”Journal of Advertising Research, 40 (1/2), 95–102.
23.
GoldsteinKenneth, FranzMichael, and RidoutTravis (2002), “Political Advertising in 2000,” combined file [data set], final release. Madison, WI: The Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin–Madison and the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.
24.
GoldsteinKenneth, and RivlinJoel (2005), “Political Advertising in 2002,” combined file [data set], final release. Madison, WI: The Wisconsin Advertising Project, The Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.
25.
GorenPaul (2005), “Party Identification and Core Political Values,”American Journal of Political Science, 49 (4), 881–96.
26.
GornGerald J., JiangYuwei, and JoharGita (2008), “Babyfaces, Trait Inferences, and Company Evaluations in a PR Crisis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (June), 36–49.
27.
HassinRan, and TropeYaacov (2000), “Facing Faces: Studies on the Cognitive Aspects of Physiognomy,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (5), 837–52.
28.
HofstadterRichard (1966), Anti-Intellectualism in American Life.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
29.
HomerP., and BatraRajeev (1994), “Attitudinal Effects of Character-Based Versus Competence-Based Negative Political Communications,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3 (2), 163–85.
30.
HuddyLeonie, and TerkildsenNayda (1993), “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates,”American Journal of Political Science, 37 (1), 119–47.
31.
JacobsonGary (1990), “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments,”American Journal of Political Science, 34 (2), 334–62.
32.
JuddCharles, James-HawkinsLaurie, YzerbytVincent, and KashimaYoshihisa (2005), “Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations Between Judgment of Competence and Warmth,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (December), 899–913.
33.
KahleL.R., and HomerPamela (1985), “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (March), 954–61.
34.
KleinJill, and AhluwaliaRohini (2005), “Negativity in the Evaluation of Political Candidates,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (January), 131–42.
35.
KoernigStephen K., and PageAlbert L. (2002), “What if Your Dentist Looked Like Tom Cruise? Applying the Match-Up Hypothesis to a Service Encounter,”Psychology and Marketing, 19 (1), 91–110.
36.
LangloisJudith H., KalakanisLisa E., RubensteinAdam J., LarsonAndrea D., HallamMonica J., and SmootMonica T. (2000), “Maxims or Myths of Beauty: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review,”Psychological Bulletin, 126 (May), 390–423.
37.
LauRichard, and PomperGerald (2004), Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
38.
LauRichard, SigelmanLee, HeldmanCaroline, and BabittPaul (1999), “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment,”American Political Science Review, 93 (4), 851–75.
39.
LeighAndrew, and SusiloT. (2009), “Is Voting Skin-Deep? Estimating the Effect of Candidate Ballot Photographs on Election Outcomes,”Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (1), 61–70.
40.
LevittSteven (1994), “Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House,”Journal of Political Economy, 102 (4), 777–98.
41.
LynchJames, and SchulerDrue (1994), “The Matchup Effect of Spokesperson and Product Category: A Schema Theory Interpretation,”Psychology and Marketing, 11 (5), 417–45.
42.
MarkDavid (2006), Going Dirty: The Art of Negative Campaigning.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
43.
MarkusGregory (1982), “Political Attitudes During an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study,”American Political Science Review, 76 (3), 538–60.
MuellerUlrich, and MazurAllan (1996), “Facial Dominance of West Point Cadets as a Predictor of Later Military Rank,”Social Forces, 74 (3), 823–50.
46.
NewmanBruce, and ShethJagdish (1985), “A Model of Primary Voter Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (2), 178–87.
47.
OlneyThomas, HolbrookMorris, and BatraRajeev (1991), “Consumer Responses to Advertising: The Effects of Ad Content, Emotions, and Attitude Toward the Ad on Viewing Time,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (4), 440–53.
48.
PetrocikJohn (1996), “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections with a 1980 Case Study,”American Journal of Political Science, 40 (3), 825–50.
49.
PinkletonBruce (1997), “The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations,”Journal of Advertising, 26 (1), 19–29.
50.
RosenbergSeymour, NelsonCarnot, and VivekananthanP.S. (1968), “A Multidimensional Approach to the Structure of Personality Impressions,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 (4), 283–94.
51.
RosenbergShawn W., and McCaffertyPatrick (1987), “The Image and the Vote: Manipulating Voters' Preferences,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 51 (1), 31–47.
52.
RuleNicholas, and AmbadyNalini (2008), “The Face of Success,”Psychological Science, 19 (2), 109–111.
53.
ShanksJ. Merill, and MillerWarren E. (1990), “Policy Direction and Performance Evaluation: Complementary Explanations of the Reagan Election,”British Journal of Political Science, 20 (April), 143–235.
54.
ShapiroBen (2008), Project President: Bad Hair and Botox on the Road to the White House.Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
55.
SorescuAlina, and GelbBetsy (2000), “Negative Comparative Advertising: Evidence Favoring Fine Tuning,”Journal of Advertising, 29 (4), 25–40.
56.
StantonFrank (2000), “The First Debate over Presidential Debates,”Newsweek, 136 (13), 11.
57.
TeinowitzIra (2004), “Election Ad Spending Hits Record 1.6 Billion,”Advertising Age, (October 25), 1.
58.
ThomsonMatthew (2006), “Human Brands: Investigating Antecedents to Consumers' Strong Attachments to Celebrities,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (July), 104–119.
59.
ThompsonSeth, and SteckenriderJanie (1997), “The Relative Irrelevance of Candidate Sex,”Women and Politics, 17 (4), 71–92.
TurnerJohn, OakesPenelope, Alexander HaslamS., and McGartyCraig (1994), “Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20 (5), 454–63.
64.
WelchWilliam (1974), “The Economics of Campaign Funds,”Public Choice, 20 (1), 83–97.
65.
WyerRobert, SrullT., and GordonS. (1984), “The Effects of Predicting a Person's Behavior on Subsequent Trait Judgments,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20 (1), 29–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
