Market structure analysis is a basic pillar of marketing research. Classic challenges in marketing such as pricing, campaign management, brand positioning, and new product development are rooted in an analysis of product substitutes and complements inferred from market structure. In this article, the authors present a method to support the analysis and visualization of market structure by automatically eliciting product attributes and brand's relative positions from online customer reviews. First, the method uncovers attributes and attribute dimensions using the “voice of the consumer,” as reflected in customer reviews, rather than that of manufacturers. Second, the approach runs automatically. Third, the process supports rather than supplants managerial judgment by reinforcing or augmenting attributes and dimensions found through traditional surveys and focus groups. The authors test the approach on six years of customer reviews for digital cameras during a period of rapid market evolution. They analyze and visualize results in several ways, including comparisons with expert buying guides, a laboratory survey, and correspondence analysis of automatically discovered product attributes. The authors evaluate managerial insights drawn from the analysis with respect to proprietary market research reports from the same period analyzing digital imaging products.
AllenbyGreg, FennellGeraldine, BemmaorAlbert, BhargavaVijay, ChristenFrancois, DawleyJackie (2002), “Market Segmentation Research: Beyond Within and Across Group Differences,”Marketing Letters, 13 (3), 233–44.
2.
ArchakNikolay, GhoseAnindya, Panagiotis, and IpeirotisG. (2007), “Show Me the Money! Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews,” in Proceedings of the ACM KDD 2007, San Jose, CA.New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
3.
BondJason, and MichailidisGeorge (1997), “Interactive Correspondence Analysis in a Dynamic Object-Oriented Environment,”Journal of Statistical Software, 2 (8), 1–31.
DellarocasChrysanthos (2003), “The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms,”Management Science49 (10), 1407–1424.
6.
DeSarboWayne S., HowardDaniel J., and JedidiKamel (1991), “Multiclus: A New Method for Simultaneously Performing Multidimensional Scaling and Cluster Analysis,”Psychometrika, 56 (1), 121–36.
7.
DhillonInderjit S., MallelaSubramanyam, and KumarRahul (2002), “Enhanced Word Clustering for Hierarchical Text Classification,” in Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 191–200.
8.
EliashbergJehoshua, Steven, and ShuganM. (1997), “Film Critics: Influencers or Predictors?”Journal of Marketing, 61 (April), 68–78.
9.
ElrodTerry (1988), “Choice Map: Inferring a Product-Market Map from Panel Data,”Marketing Science, 7 (1), 21–40.
10.
ElrodTerry (1991), “Internal Analysis of Market Structure: Recent Developments and Future Prospects,”Marketing Letters, 2 (3), 253–66.
11.
ElrodTerry, RussellGary J., ShockerAllan D., AndrewsRick L., BaconLynd, BayusBarry L. (2002), “Inferring Market Structure from Customer Response to Competing and Complementary Products,”Marketing Letters, 13 (3), 221–32.
12.
ErdemTülin, Michael, and KeaneP. (1996), “Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Good Markets,”Marketing Science15 (1), 1–20.
13.
EverittBrian S., and DunnGraham (2001), Applied Multivariate Data Analysis.New York: Oxford University Press.
FeldmanRonen, FreskoMoshe, GoldenbergJacob, NetzerOded, Lyle, and UngarH. (2007), “Extracting Product Comparisons from Discussion Boards,”Proceedings of the 2007 Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 469–74.
16.
FeldmanRonen, FreskoMoshe, GoldenbergJacob, NetzerOded, Lyle, and UngarH. (2008), “Using Text Mining to Analyze User Forums,” in Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management.New York: IEEE.
17.
GantiVenkatesh, GehrkeJohannes, and RamakrishnanRaghu (1999), CACTUS—Clustering Categorical Data Using Summaries.San Diego: ACM SIGKDD.
18.
GhoseAnindya, Panagiotis, and IpeirotisG. (2006), “The Dimensions of Reputation in Electronic Markets,” NYU Center for Digital Economy Research Working Paper No. CeDER-06-02, (accessed June 27, 2011), [available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=885568].
19.
GhoseAnindya, Panagiotis, and IpeirotisG. (2008), “Estimating the Socio-Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics,” NYU Stern Research Working Paper CeDER-08-06, Stern School of Business, New York University.
20.
GibsonD., KleinbergJ., and RaghavanP. (1998), “Clustering Categorical Data: An Approach Based on Dynamical Systems,” paper presented at 24th International Conference on Very Large Databases.
21.
GoldbergStephen M., GreenPaul E., and WindYoram (1984), “Conjoint Analysis of Price Premiums for Hotel Amenities,”Journal of Business, 57 (1), 111–32.
GreenPaul E., and KriegerAbba M. (1991), “Segmenting Markets with Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 55 (October), 20–31.
24.
GreenPaul E., and SrinivasanV. (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,”Journal of Consumer Research5 (September), 103–123.
25.
GreenacreMichael J. (1992), “Correspondence Analysis in Medical Research,”Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1 (1), 97–117.
26.
GriffinAbbie, John, and HauserR. (1993), “The Voice of the Customer,”Marketing Science12 (1), 1–27.
27.
HauserJohn R., and ClausingDon (1988), “The House of Quality,”Harvard Business Review, 3 (May/June), 63–73.
28.
HearstMarti (1992), “Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora,” in COLING ‘92 Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics, Vol. 2. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 539–45.
29.
HillShawndra, ProvostFoster, and VolinskyChris (2006), “Network-Based Marketing: Identifying Likely Adopters via Consumer Networks,”Statistical Science, 21, 21.
30.
HillierFrederick S., and LiebermanGerald J. (2001), Introduction to Operations Research.New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
HuMinqing, and LiuBing (2004), “Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews,” in KDD04.Seattle: Association for Computing Machinery.
32.
HuberJoel, and ZwerinaKlaus (1996), “The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (August), 307–317.
33.
KamakuraWagner A., and RussellGary J. (1989), “A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (November), 87–96.
34.
KrzanowskiWojtek J., and LaiY.T. (1988), “A Criterion for Determining the Number of Groups in a Data Set Using Sum-of-Squares Clustering,”Biometrics, 44 (1), 23–34.
35.
LeeThomas Y. (2005), “Ontology Induction for Mining Experiential Knowledge from Customer Reviews,” presentation at Utah Winter Information Systems Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, (March 11–12).
36.
LeeThomas Y. (2009), “Automatically Learning User Needs from Online Reviews for New Product Design,” in AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, (accessed June 29, 2011), [available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/22].
37.
LiuBing, HuMinqing, and ChengJunsheng (2005), “Opinion Observer: Analyzing and Comparing Opinions on the Web,” in www'05: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web.New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
38.
Lyra Research Inc. (2003), “The Digital Camera Market: Worldwide Trends and Forecast through 2006,” research report.
39.
Lyra Research Inc. (2005), “Inside the Mind of the Digital Photographer: A Complete Photo Behavior Profile by Gender, Age, Education and Income,” research report.
40.
MichalekJeremy J., FeinbergFred M., and PapalambrosPanos Y. (2005), “Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (1), 42–62.
41.
MooreWilliam L., Gray-LeeJason, and LouviereJordan J. (1998), “A Cross-Validity Comparison of Conjoint Analysis and Choice Models at Different Levels of Aggregation,”Marketing Letters, 9 (2), 195–207.
42.
MooreWilliam L., LouviereJordan J., and VermaRohit (1999), “Using Conjoint Analysis to Help Design Product Platforms,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16 (1), 27–39.
PantGautam, and ShengOlivia (2009), “Avoiding the Blind Spots: Competitor Identification Using Web Text and Linkage Structure,” in ICIS 2009 Proceedings, (accessed June 29, 2011), [available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/57].
45.
PopescuAna-Maria, YatesAlexander, and EtzioniOren (2004), “Class Extraction from the World Wide Web,” in Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining: Papers from the 2004 AAAI Workshop, MusleaIon, ed. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
46.
RandallTaylor, TerwieschChristian, Karl, and UlrichT. (2007), “User Design of Customized Products.”Marketing Science, 26 (2), 268–80.
47.
SaltonGerald, Michael, and McGillJ. (1983), Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval.New York: McGraw-Hill.
48.
SrivastavaRajendra K., AlpertMark I., and ShockerAllan D. (1984), “A Customer-Oriented Approach for Determining Market Structures,”Journal of Marketing48 (Spring), 32–45.
49.
TibshiraniRobert, and WaltherGuenther (2005), “Cluster Validation by Prediction Strength,”Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics, 14 (3), 511–28.
50.
ToubiaOlivier, SimesterDuncan I., and HauserJohn R. (2003), “Fast Polyhederal Adaptive Conjoint Estimation,”Marketing Science, 22 (3), 273–303.
51.
TurneyPeter D. (2002), “Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews,”Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 417–24.
52.
UlrichKarl T., and EppingerSteven D. (2003), Product Design and Development.New York: McGraw-Hill.
53.
UrbanGlen L., and HauserJohn R. (1993), Design and Marketing of New Products.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54.
UrbanGlen L., JohnsonPhilip L., and HauserJohn R. (1984), “Testing Competitive Market Structure,”Marketing Science, 3 (2), 83–112.
55.
WestPatricia M., BrownChristina L., and HochStephen J. (1996), “Consumption Vocabulary and Preference Formation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (2), 120–35.
56.
WittinkDick R., and CattinPhilippe (1989), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update.”Journal of Marketing, 53 (July), 91–96.
57.
WittinkDick R., KrishnamurthiLakshman, Julia, and NutterB. (1982), “Comparing Derived Importance Weights Across Attributes,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (1), 471–74.
58.
WorthingtonPaul (2003), “Digital Cameras: Strategies to Reach the Late Majority,”Future Image Inc.
59.
YangSha, AllenbyGreg M., and FennellGeraldine (2002), “Modeling Variation in Brand Preference: The Roles of Objective Environment and Motivating Conditions,”Marketing Science, 21 (1), 14–31.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
