Four studies demonstrate how consumers resolve the aesthetic incongruity that arises between a newly acquired product and the existing consumption environment. The novel insight on which this research is based is that the aesthetic incongruity involving products high in design salience is more likely than aesthetic incongruity involving products low in design salience to be resolved by accommodating the product within the consumption environment, often through additional purchases. Furthermore, the relative presence of frustration versus regret is shown to mediate the relationship between design salience and the decision to buy more.
AggarwalPankaj, and McGillAnn L., (2007), “Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(December), 468–79.
2.
AverillJames R., StanatPetra, and MoreThomas A., (1998), “Aesthetics and the Environment,”Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 153–74.
3.
BellengerDanny N., RobertsonDan H., and HirschmanElizabeth C., (1978), “Impulse Buying Varies by Product,”Journal of Advertising Research, 18(December), 15–18.
4.
BerlyneDaniel, E., (1974), Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation.Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
5.
BlochPeter, H., (1995), “Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response,”Journal of Marketing, 59(July), 16–29.
6.
BlochPeter H., BrunelFrédéric F., and ArnoldTodd J., (2003), “Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(March), 551–65.
7.
BrennerLyle, RottenstreichYuval, SoodSanjay, and BilginBaler, (2007), “On the Psychology of Loss Aversion: Possession, Valence, and Reversals of the Endowment Effect,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(October), 369–76.
8.
ColvinC. Randall, BlockJack, and FunderDavid C., (1996), “Psychometric Truths in the Absence of Psychological Meaning: A Reply to Zuckerman and Knee,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1252–55.
9.
DahlDarren W., ChattopadhyayAmitava, and GornGerald J., (1999), “The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(February), 18–28.
10.
DahlDarren W., and Page MoreauC., (2007), “Thinking Inside the Box: Why Consumers Enjoy Constrained Creative Experiences,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44(August), 357–369.
11.
DaviesStephen, HigginsKathleen Marie, HopkinsRobert, SteckerRobert, and CooperDavid E., (2009), A Companion to Aesthetics.Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons/Blackwell Publishing.
12.
DuttonDenis, (2002), “Aesthetic Universals,” in The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, GautBerys, and LopesDominic McIver, eds. London: Routledge, 279–92.
13.
EppAmber M., and PriceLinda L., (2010), “The Storied Life of Singularized Objects: Forces of Agency and Network Transformation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 820–37.
14.
FolkesValerie, S., (1988), “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(March), 548–65.
15.
HagtvedtHenrik, HagtvedtReidar, and PatrickVanessa M., (2008), “The Perception and Evaluation of Visual Art,”Empirical Studies of the Arts, 26(2), 197–218.
16.
HirschmanElizabeth, C., (1983), “Aesthetics, Ideologies, and the Limits of the Marketing Concept,”Journal of Marketing, 47(Summer), 45–55.
17.
HolbrookMorris B., and SchindlerRobert M., (1994), “Age, Sex, and Attitude Toward the Past as Predictors of Consumers’ Aesthetic Tastes for Cultural Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 31(August), 412–22.
18.
HossRebbecca A., and LangloisJudith H., (2003), “Infants Prefer Attractive Faces,” in The Development of Face Processing in Infancy and Early Childhood: Current Perspectives, PascalisO., and SlaterA., eds. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 27–38.
19.
InmanJ. Jeffrey, (2007), “Regret Regulation: Disentangling Self-Reproach from Learning,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 19–24.
20.
InmanJ. Jeffrey, and ZeelenbergMarcel, (2002), “Regret in Repeat Purchase Versus Switching Decisions: The Attenuating Role of Decision Justifiability,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 116–28.
21.
KahnemanDaniel, and TverskyAmos, (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica, 47(March), 263–91.
22.
KreitlerHans, and KreitlerShulamith, (1972), Psychology of the Arts.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23.
LazarusRichard, S., (2001), “Relational Meaning and Discrete Emotions,” in Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research, SchererKlaus R., and SchorrAngela, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 36–67.
24.
LindgaardGitte, and Allen WhitfieldT.W., (2004), “Integrating Aesthetics Within an Evolutionary and Psychological Framework,”Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5(1), 73–90.
25.
MandlerGeorge, (1982), “The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste,” in Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium, ClarkMargaret S., and FiskeSusan T., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3–36.
26.
McCrackenGrant, (1988), Culture and Consumption.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27.
McManusI. Christopher, and FurnhamAdrian, (2006), “Aesthetic Activities and Aesthetic Attitudes: Influences of Education, Background, and Personality on Interest and Involvement in the Arts,”British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 555–87.
28.
NenkovGergana, Jeffrey InmanJ., and HullandJohn, (2008), “Expectations About the Future: Elaboration of Potential Outcomes as a Determinant of Self-Regulation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(June), 126–41.
29.
PageChristine, and HerrPaul M., (2002), “An Investigation of the Processes by Which Product Design and Brand Strength Interact to Determine Initial Affect and Quality Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 133–47.
30.
PavlovaMarina, SokolovArseny A., and SokolovAlexander, (2005), “Perceived Dynamics of Static Images Enables Emotional Attribution,”Perception, 34(9), 1107–1116.
31.
PeracchioLaura A., and Meyers-LevyJoan, (1994), “How Ambiguous Cropped Objects in Ad Photos Can Affect Product Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 190–204.
32.
PickfordR.W., (1972), Psychology and Visual Aesthetics.London: Hutchinson Educational.
33.
PostrelVirginia, (2003), The Substance of Style: How the Rise of Aesthetic Value Is Remaking Commerce, Culture, and Consciousness.New York: HarperCollins.
34.
PreacherKristopher J., and HayesAndrew F., (2004), “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models,”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–31.
35.
SchmittBernd H., and SimonsonAlex, (1997), Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity, and Image.New York: The Free Press.
36.
SchrickelH.G., (1943), “On the Objectivity of Aesthetic Values,”Psychological Review, 50(6), 622–31.
37.
SherryJohn F.Jr., McGrathMary Ann, and LevySidney J., (1992), “The Distribution of the Gift and Many Unhappy Returns,”Journal of Retailing, 68(1), 40–65.
38.
StockJames, SpehThomas, and ShearHerbert, (2002), “Many Happy (Product) Returns,”Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 16–17.
39.
StraussAnselm, and CorbinJuliet, (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40.
TisakJohn, and SmithCarlla S., (1994), “Defending and Extending Difference Score Methods,”Journal of Management, 20(3), 675–82.
41.
VeryzerRobert W., and Wesley HutchinsonJ., (1998), “The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 374–94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
