Consumers’ attraction to a product can often be based on the subjective reactions that they imagine they would have if they personally used it. Three experiments examine the effects of self-focused attention on the use of this criterion and the conditions in which it is applied. When features of the judgment (social or nonsocial) context are similar to those of the situation in which the products are normally used, self-focused attention increases participants’ disposition to imagine themselves using the products they evaluate, and in turn, these imaginings increase both their evaluations of these products and their likelihood of choosing these products as a gift for taking part in the experiment. The effects occur when features of the judgment context are manipulated both by incidental background music and by the presence of others in the situation at hand. However, when either self-focused attention is low or features of the judgment context are dissimilar to those in which the products are normally used, these effects are not apparent.
AdavalRashmi, IsbellLinda M., and WyerRobert S.Jr., (2007), “The Impact of Pictures on Narrative-Based Impression Formation: A Process Interference Model,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(May), 352–64.
2.
AdavalRashmi, and WyerRobert S.Jr., (1998), “The Role of Narratives in Consumer Information Processing,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 207–245.
3.
AndersonNorman, H., (1971), “Integration Theory and Attitude Change,”Psychological Review, 78(3), 171–206.
4.
BaumgartnerHans, SujanMita, and BettmanJames R., (1992), “Autobiographical Memories, Affect, and Consumer Information Processing,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(1), 53–82.
5.
BrileyDonnel A., and WyerRobert S.Jr., (2002), “The Effects of Group Membership on the Avoidance of Negative Outcomes: Implications for Social and Consumer Decisions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 400–415.
6.
BurnkrantRobert E., and Rao UnnavaH., (1995), “Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26(June), 17–26.
7.
ChildersTerry L., HoustonMichael J., and HecklerSusan E., (1985), “Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 125–34.
8.
DahlDarren W., and HoefflerSteve, (2004), “Visualizing the Self: Exploring the Potential Benefits for New Product Evaluation,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(4), 259–67.
9.
DuvalShelley T., and WicklundRobert A., (1972), A Theory of Objective Self Awareness.Oxford: Academic Press.
10.
EscalasEdson, J., (2007), “Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation Versus Analytical Elaboration,”Journal of Consumer Research, 33(March), 421–29.
11.
FeldmanJack M., and LynchJohn G.Jr., (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421–35.
12.
FenigsteinAllan, ScheierMichael F., and BussArnold H., (1975), “Public and Private Self- Consciousness: Assessment and Theory,”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522–27.
13.
FörsterJens, and LibermanNira, (2006), “Knowledge Activation,” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2d ed., KruglanskiArie W., and Tory HigginsE., eds. New York: Guilford, 201–231.
14.
GasperKaren, and CloreGerald L., (2000), “Do You Have to Pay Attention to Your Feelings to Be Influenced by Them?”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(6), 698–711.
15.
GornGerald, J., (1982), “The Effects of Music in Advertising on Choice Behavior: A Classical Conditioning Approach,”Journal of Marketing, 46(Winter), 94–101.
16.
HigginsE. Tory, RholesWilliam S., and JonesCarl R., (1977), “Category Accessibility and Impression Formation,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 141–54.
17.
HungIris W., and WyerRobert S.Jr., (2009), “Differences in Perspective and the Influence of Charitable Appeals: When Imagining Oneself as the Victim Is Not Beneficial,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46(June), 421–34.
18.
HuttonDebra G., and BaumeisterRoy F., (1992), “Self-Awareness and Attitude Change: Seeing Oneself on the Central Route to Persuasion,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 68–75.
19.
JiangYuwei, and WyerRobert S.Jr., (2009), “The Role of Visual Perspective in Information Processing,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 486–95.
20.
KosslynSteven, M., (1976), “Can Imagery Be Distinguished from Other Forms of Internal Representation? Evidence from Studies of Information Retrieval Time,”Memory & Cognition, 4, 291–97.
21.
PetrovaPetia K., and CialdiniRobert B., (2005), “Fluency of Consumption Imagery and the Backfire Effects of Imagery Appeals,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 442–52.
22.
PhamMichel, T., (1998), “Representativeness, Relevance, and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 25(September), 167–88.
23.
PryorJohn B., GibbonsFrederick X., WicklundRobert A., FazioRussell H., and HoodRonald, (1977), “Self-Focused Attention and Self-Report Validity,”Journal of Personality, 45(4), 513–27.
24.
ScheierMichael F., and CarverCharles S., (1977), “Self-Focused Attention and the Experience of Emotion: Attraction, Repulsion, Elation, and Depression,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 625–36.
25.
ScheierMichael F., and CarverCharles S., (1980), “Private and Public Self-Attention, Resistance to Change, and Dissonance Reduction,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 390–405.
26.
SchwarzNorbert, (2004), “Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–48.
27.
SchwarzNorbert, and CloreGerald L., (1996), “Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences,” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, HigginsEdward Tory, and KruglanskiArie W., eds. New York: Guilford Press, 433–65.
28.
SujanMita, BettmanJames R., and BaumgartnerHans, (1993), “Influencing Consumer Judgments Using Autobiographical Memories: A Self-Referencing Perspective,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30(November), 422–36.
29.
WinkielmanPiotr, and CacioppoJohn T., (2001), “Mind at Ease Puts a Smile on the Face: Psychophysiological Evidence That Processing Facilitation Elicits Positive Affect,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000.
30.
WyerRobert, S., (2008), “The Role of Knowledge Accessibility in Cognition and Behavior: Implications for Consumer Information Processing,” in Handbook of Consumer Psychology, HaugtvedtCurtis P., HerrPaul, and KardesFrank, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 31–75.
31.
WyerRobert S., AdavalRashmi, and ColcombeStanley J., (2002), “Narrative-Based Representations of Social Knowledge: Their Construction and Use in Comprehension, Memory, and Judgment,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35, ZannaMark P., ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 133–97.
32.
WyerRobert S., HungIris W., and JiangYuwei, (2008), “Visual and Verbal Processing Strategies in Comprehension and Judgment,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(4), 244–57.
33.
YeungCatherine W.M., and WyerRobert S.Jr., (2004), “Affect, Appraisal, and Consumer Judgment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 412–24.
34.
ZhuRui (Juliet), and Meyers-LevyJoan, (2005), “Distinguishing Between the Meanings of Music: When Background Music Affects Product Perceptions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(August), 333–45.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
