Demonstrations of marketing effectiveness currently proceed along two parallel tracks: Quantitative researchers model the direct sales effects of the marketing mix, and advertising and branding experts trace customer mind-set metrics (e.g., awareness, affect). The authors merge the two tracks and analyze the added explanatory value of including customer mind-set metrics in a sales response model that already accounts for short- and long-term effects of advertising, price, distribution, and promotion. Vector autoregressive modeling of the metrics for more than 60 brands of four consumer goods shows that advertising awareness, brand consideration, and brand liking account for almost one-third of explained sales variance. Competitive and own mind-set metrics make a similar contribution. Wear-in times reveal that mind-set metrics can be used as advance warning signals that allow enough time for managerial action before market performance itself is affected. Specific marketing actions affect specific mind-set metrics, with the strongest overall impact for distribution. The findings suggest that modelers should include mind-set metrics in sales response models and branding experts should include competition in their tracking research.
AilawadiKusum L., LehmannDonald R., and NeslinScott A. (2001), “Market Response to a Major Policy Change in the Marketing Mix: Learning from Procter & Gamble's Value Pricing Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 65(January), 44–61.
2.
AlbaJoseph W., HutchinsonWes, and LynchJohn G. (1991), “Memory and Decision Making,” in Handbook of Consumer Theory and Research, KassarjianH.J., and RobertsonT.S., eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1–49.
3.
AmblerTim (2003), Marketing and the Bottom Line, 2d ed. London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
4.
AtamanBerk, van HeerdeHarald J., and CarlF. Mela (2008), “Building Brands,”Marketing Science, 27(6), 1036–1054.
5.
BatraRajeev, and VanhonackerWilfred (1988), “Falsifying Laboratory Results Through Fields Tests: A Time-Series Methodology and Some Results,”Journal of Business Research, 16(June), 281–300.
6.
BelchGeorge E., and BelchMichael A. (2004), Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
BenkwitzAlexander, LütkepohlHelmut, and WoltersJürgen (2001), “Comparison of Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Impulse Responses of German Monetary Systems,”Macroeconomic Dynamics, 5(1), 81–100.
8.
BijmoltTammo H.A., van HeerdeHarald J., and PietersRik G.M. (2005), “New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(May), 141–56.
9.
BlattbergRobert C., and NeslinScott A. (1990), Sales Promotion Concepts, Methods, and Strategies.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Boyd HarperW., RayMichael L., and StrongEdward C. (1972), “An Attitudinal Framework for Advertising Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 36(April), 27–33.
11.
BronnenbergBart, MahajanVijay, and VanhonackerWilfried (2000), “The Emergence of Market Structure in New Repeat-Purchase Categories: A Dynamic Approach and an Empirical Application,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37(February), 16–31.
12.
ChristenMarcus, GuptaSachin, PorterJohn C., StaelinRichard, and WittinkDick R. (1997), “Using Market-Level Data to Understand Nonlinear Promotion Effects,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(August), 322–34.
13.
ColleyRussell, H. (1961), Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results.New York: Association of National Advertisers.
14.
DavisJohn (2006), Measuring Marketing: 103 Key Metrics Every Marketer Needs.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
DekimpeMarnik G., and HanssensDominique M. (1995), “The Persistence of Marketing Effects on Sales,”Marketing Science, 14(1), 1–21.
16.
DekimpeMarnik G., and HanssensDominique M. (1999), “Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long-Term Marketing Profitability,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(November), 397–412.
17.
DekimpeMarnik G., and HanssensDominique M. (2007), “Advertising Response Models,” in Handbook of Advertising, TellisGerard J., and AmblerTim, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 247–63.
18.
EndersWalter (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
EvansLewis, and WellsGraeme (1983), “An Alternative Approach to Simulating VAR Models,”Economic Letters, 12(1), 23–29.
20.
FarrisPaul W., BendleNeil T., PfeiferPhillip E., and ReibsteinDavid J. (2006), 50+ Metrics Every Executive Should Master.Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing.
21.
FransesPhilip Hans, and VriensMarco (2004), “Advertising Effects on Awareness, Consideration and Brand Choice Using Tracking Data,” working paper, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University.
22.
GuadagniPeter M., and LittleJohn D.C. (1983), “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data,”Marketing Science, 1(2), 203–238.
23.
GuptaSunil, and ZeithamlValarie (2006), “Customer Metrics and Their Impact on Financial Performance,”Marketing Science, 25(6), 718–39.
24.
HamiltonJames (1994), Time Series Analysis.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
HanssensDominique, M. (1998), “Order Forecasts, Retail Sales and the Marketing Mix for Consumer Durables,”Journal of Forecasting, 17(3-4), 327–46.
26.
HanssensDominique M., ParsonsLeonard J., and SchultzRandall L. (2001), Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis, 2d ed. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27.
HorváthCsilla (2003), “Dynamic Analysis of a Competitive Marketing System,” doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
28.
KellerKevin Lane (2003), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1–22.
29.
KellerKevin Lane, and LehmannDonald R. (2006), “Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities,”Marketing Science, 25(November-December), 740–59.
30.
KotlerPhilip (2003), Marketing Insights from A to Z: 80 Concepts Every Manager Needs to Know.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
31.
KotlerPhilip, and KellerKevin Lane (2006), Framework for Marketing Management, 3d ed. New York: Pearson Education.
32.
LambinJean-Jacques (1976), Advertising, Competition and Market Conduct in Oligopoly over Time.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33.
LaPointePatrick (2005), Marketing by the Dashboard Light.New York: Association of National Advertisers Press.
34.
LehmannDonald, R. (2004), “Metrics for Making Marketing Matter,”Journal of Marketing, 68(October), 73–75.
35.
LehmannDonald, R. (2005), “The Metrics Imperative: Making Marketing Matter,” in Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 2, MalhotraNaresh, K., ed. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 177–202.
36.
LehmannDonald R., and ReibsteinDavid J. (2006), Marketing Metrics and Financial Performance.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
37.
LittleJohn, D. (1979), “Aggregate Advertising Models: The State of the Art,”Operations Research, 27(4), 629–67.
38.
LütkepohlHelmut (1993), Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
39.
Marketing Science Institute (2006), 2006–2008 Research Priorities: A Guide to MSI Research Programs and Procedures.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
40.
MorwitzVicky G., JohnsonEric, and SchmittleinDavid (1993), “Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior?”Journal of Consumer Research, 20(June), 41–61.
41.
NijsVincent R., DekimpeMarnik G., SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and HanssensDominique M. (2001), “The Category Demand Effects of Price Promotions,”Marketing Science, 20(1), 1–22.
42.
NijsVincent R., SrinivasanShuba, and PauwelsKoen H. (2007), “Retail-Price Drivers and Retailer Profits,”Marketing Science, 26(4), 473–87.
43.
PaldaKristian, S. (1966), “The Hypothesis of a Hierarchy of Effects: A Partial Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 3(February), 13–24.
44.
PauwelsKoen, H. (2004), “How Dynamic Consumer Response, Competitor Response, Company Support, and Company Inertia Shape Long-Term Marketing Effectiveness,”Marketing Science, 23(4), 596–610.
45.
PauwelsKoen H., AmblerTim, ClarkBruce, LaPointePat, ReibsteinDavid, SkieraBernd (2009), “Dashboards as a Service: Why, What, How, and What Research Is Needed?”Journal of Service Research, 12(2), 175–89.
46.
PauwelsKoen H., and HanssensDominique M. (2007), “Performance Regimes and Marketing Policy Shifts,”Marketing Science, 26(3), 293–311.
47.
PauwelsKoen H., HanssensDominique M., and SiddarthS. (2002), “The Long-Term Effects of Price Promotions on Category Incidence, Brand Choice, and Purchase Quantity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(November), 421–39.
48.
PauwelsKoen H., and JoshiAmit (2008), “Counting What Will Count: Does Your Dashboard Predict?” working paper, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College.
49.
PauwelsKoen H., Silva-RissoJorge M., SrinivasanShuba, and HanssensDominique M. (2004), “New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry,”Journal of Marketing, 68(October), 142–56.
50.
PauwelsKoen H., and SrinivasanShuba (2004), “Who Benefits from Store Brand Entry?”Marketing Science, 23(3), 364–90.
51.
PerronPierre (1989), “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis,”Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–1401.
52.
PerronPierre (1990), “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean,”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8(2), 153–62.
53.
PesaranHashem H., and ShinYongcheol (1998), “Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models,”Economic Letters, 58(1), 17–29.
54.
RustRoland T., AmblerTim, CarpenterGregory S., KumarV., and SrivastavaRajendra K. (2004), “Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions,”Journal of Marketing, 68(October), 76–89.
55.
SlotegraafRebecca J., and PauwelsKoen H. (2008), “The Impact of Brand Equity and Innovation on the Long-Term Effectiveness of Promotions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(August), 293–306.
56.
SrinivasanShuba, and HanssensDominique M. (2009), “Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46(June), 293–312.
57.
SrinivasanShuba, PauwelsKoen H., HanssensDominique M., and DekimpeMarnik G. (2004), “Do Promotions Benefit Manufacturers, Retailers, or Both?”Management Science, 50(5), 617–29.
58.
SrinivasanShuba, PauwelsKoen H., and NijsVincent (2008), “Demand-Based Pricing Versus Past-Price Dependence: A Cost–Benefit Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 72(March), 15–27.
59.
SrinivasanShuba, PopkowskiPeter T.L., and BassFrank M. (2000), “Market Share Response and Competitive Interaction: The Impact of Temporary, Evolving and Structural Changes in Prices,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(4), 281–305.
60.
TellisGerard, J. (1988), “The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15(August), 331–41.
61.
TellisGerard, J. (2004), Effective Advertising: Understanding When, How, and Why Advertising Works.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
62.
TellisGerard J., and AmblerTim (2007), Handbook of Advertising.London: Sage Publications.
63.
VakratsasDemetrios, and AmblerTim (1999), “How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know?”Journal of Marketing, 63(January), 26–43.
64.
Van HeerdeHarald J., LeeflangPeter S.H., and WittinkDick R. (2004), “Decomposing the Sales Promotion Bump with Store Data,”Marketing Science, 23(3), 317–34.
65.
Van HeerdeHarald J., SrinivasanShuba, and DekimpeMarnik G. (2010), “Estimating Cannibalization Rates for Pioneering Innovations,”Marketing Science, forthcoming.
66.
WebsterFredrick, MalterAlan, and GanesanShankar (2003), “Can Marketing Regain Its Seat at the Table?” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper No. 03–113, MSI Reports.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 29–48.
67.
ZinkhanGeorge M., and FornellClaes (1989), “A Test of the Learning Hierarchy in High- and Low-Involvement Situations,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 16, SrullThomas, K., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 152–59.
68.
ZivotEric, and AndrewsDonald W.K. (1992), “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis,”Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–70.
69.
ZufrydenFred (1996), “Linking Advertising to Box-Office Performance of New Film Releases: A Marketing Planning Model,”Journal of Advertising Research, 36(4), 29–41.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
