The authors review the implicit association test (IAT), its use in marketing, and the methodology and validity issues that surround it. They focus on a validity problem that has not been investigated previously, namely, the impact of cognitive inertia on IAT effects. Cognitive inertia refers to the difficulty in switching from one categorization rule to another, which causes IAT effects to depend on the order of administration of the two IAT blocks. In Study 1, the authors observe an IAT effect when the compatible block precedes the incompatible block but not when it follows the incompatible block. In Studies 2 and 3, the IAT effect changes its sign when the order of the blocks reverses. Cognitive inertia distorts individual IAT scores and diminishes the correlations between IAT scores and predictor variables when the block order is counterbalanced between subjects. Study 4 shows that counterbalancing the block order repeatedly within subjects can eliminate cognitive inertia effects on the individual level. The authors conclude that researchers should either interpret IAT scores at the aggregate level or, if individual IAT scores are of interest, counterbalance the block order repeatedly within subjects.
AllportAlan, and WylieGlenn, (1999), “Task-Switching: Positive and Negative Priming of Task-Set,” in Attention, Space, and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience, HumphreysGlyn W., DuncanJohn, TreismanAnne, and EdmondsEd M., eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 35–70.
2.
ArkesHal R., and TetlockPhilip E., (2004), “Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or ‘Would Jesse Jackson “Fail” the Implicit Association Test?'”Psychological Inquiry, 15(4), 257–78.
3.
AsendorpfJens B., BanseRainer, and MueckeDaniel, (2002), “Double Dissociation between Implicit and Explicit Personality Self-Concept: The Case of Shy Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 380–93.
4.
BlantonHart, JaccardJames, GonzalesPatricia M., and ChristieCharlene, (2006), “Decoding the Implicit Association Test: Implications for Criterion Prediction,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 192–212.
5.
BossonJennifer K., SwannWilliam B.Jr., and PennebakerJames W., (2000), “Stalking the Perfect Measure of Implicit Self-Esteem: The Blind Men and the Elephant Revisited?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 631–43.
6.
BrendlC. Miguel, MarkmanArthur B., and MessnerClaude, (2001), “How Do Indirect Measures of Evaluation Work? Evaluating the Inference of Prejudice in the Implicit Association Test,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 760–73.
7.
BrendlC. Miguel, MarkmanArthur B., and MessnerClaude, (2005), “Indirectly Measuring Evaluations of Several Attitude Objects in Relation to a Neutral Reference Point,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 346–68.
8.
BrunelFrédéric F., TietjeBrian C., and GreenwaldAnthony G., (2004), “Is the Implicit Association Test a Valid and Valuable Measure of Implicit Consumer Social Cognition?”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 385–404.
9.
BruyneelSabrina, DewitteSiegfried, VohsKathleen D., and WarlopLuk, (2006), “Repeated Choosing Increases Susceptibility to Affective Product Features,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(June), 215–25.
CohenJoel B., and ReedAmericusII, (2006), “A Multiple Pathway Anchoring and Adjustment (MPAA) Model of Attitude Generation and Recruitment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 1–15.
12.
CunninghamWilliam A., JohnsonMarcia K., RayeCarol L., Chris GatenbyJ., GoreJohn C., and BanajiMahzarin R., (2004), “Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White Faces,”Psychological Science, 15(12), 806–813.
13.
CunninghamWilliam A., PreacherKristopher J., and BanajiMahzarin R., (2001), “Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity,”Psychological Science, 121(2), 163–70.
14.
CzellarSandor, (2006), “Self-Presentational Effects in the Implicit Association Test,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 92–100.
15.
DasguptaNilanjana, McGheeDebbie E., GreenwaldAnthony G., and BanajiMahzarin R., (2000), “Automatic Preference for White Americans: Eliminating the Familiarity Explanation,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 316–28.
16.
De HouwerJan, (2001), “A Structural and Process Analysis of the Implicit Association Test,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 443–51.
17.
De LiverYaël, van der PligtJoop, and WigboldusDaniël, (2006), “Positive and Negative Associations Underlying Ambivalent Attitudes,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 319–26.
18.
DimofteClaudiu V., and YalchRichard F., (2007a), “Consumer Response to Polysemous Brand Slogans,”Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 515–22.
19.
DimofteClaudiu V., and YalchRichard F., (2007b), “The SMAART Scale: A Measure of Individuals’ Automatic Access to Secondary Meanings in Polysemous Statements,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 49–58.
20.
DulaneyCynthia L., and RogersWendy A., (1994), “Mechanisms Underlying Reduction in Stroop Interference with Practice for Young and Old Adults,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(2), 470–84.
21.
FazioRussell H., and OlsonMichael A., (2003), “Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Uses,”Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
22.
FiedlerKlaus, MessnerClaude, and BlümkeMatthias, (2006), “Unresolved Problems with the ‘I,’ the ‘A,’ and the ‘T’: Logical and Psychometric Critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT),”European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147.
23.
FitzsimonsGavan J., Wesley HutchinsonJ., WilliamsPatti, AlbaJoseph W., ChartrandTanya L., HuberJoel, (2002), “Non-Conscious Influences on Consumer Choice,”Marketing Letters, 13(3), 269–79.
24.
ForehandMark R., and PerkinsAndrew, (2005), “Implicit Assimilation and Explicit Contrast: A Set/Reset Model of Response to Celebrity Voiceovers,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 435–41.
25.
ForoniFrancesco, and MayrUlrich, (2005), “The Power of a Story: New, Automatic Associations from a Single Reading of a Short Scenario,”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 139–44.
26.
GibsonBryan, (2008), “Can Evaluative Conditioning Change Attitudes Toward Mature Brands? New Evidence from the Implicit Association Test,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 178–88.
27.
GladwellMalcolm, (2005), Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking.New York: Little, Brown and Company.
28.
GreenwaldAnthony G., and BanajiMahzarin R., (1995), “Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes,”Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.
29.
GreenwaldAnthony G., BanajiMahzarin R., RudmanLaurie A., FarnhamShelly D., NosekBrian A., and MellottDeborah S., (2002), “A Unified Theory of Implicit Attitudes, Stereotypes, Self-Esteem, and Self-Concept,”Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25.
30.
GreenwaldAnthony G., and FarnhamShelly D., (2000), “Using the Implicit Association Test to Measure Self-Esteem and Self-Concept,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022–38.
31.
GreenwaldAnthony G., McGheeDebbie E., and SchwartzJordan L.K., (1998), “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–80.
32.
GreenwaldAnthony G., and NosekBrian A., (2001), “Health of the Implicit Association Test at Age 3,”Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 85–93.
33.
GreenwaldAnthony G., NosekBrian A., and BanajiMahzarin R., (2003), “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.
34.
GreenwaldAnthony G., Andrew PoehlmanT., UhlmanEric Luis, and BanajiMahzarin R., (2009), “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(July), 17–41.
35.
HainesElizabeth L., and SumnerKenneth E., (2006), “Implicit Measurement of Attitudes, Stereotypes, and Self-Concepts in Organizations: Teaching Old Dogmas New Tricks,”Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 536–53.
36.
HofmannWilhelm, GawronskiBertram, GschwenderTobias, LeHuy, and SchmittManfred, (2005), “A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures,”Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–85.
37.
HofmannWilhelm, StrackFritz, and DeutschRoland, (2008), “Free to Buy? Explaining Self-Control and Impulse in Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(1), 22–26.
38.
HuangYanliu, and Wesley HutchinsonJ., (2008), “Counting Every Thought: Implicit Measures of Cognitive Responses to Advertising,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 98–118.
39.
KrayJutta, and LindenbergerUlman, (2000), “Adult Age Differences in Task Switching,”Psychology and Aging, 15(1), 126–47.
40.
MaisonDominika, GreenwaldAnthony G., and BruinRalph H., (2004), “Predictive Validity of the Implicit Association Test in Studies of Brands, Consumer Attitudes, and Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 405–415.
41.
MierkeJan, and KlauerKarl Christoph, (2003), “Method-Specific Variance in the Implicit Association Test,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1180–92.
42.
MitchellGregory, and TetlockPhilip E., (2006), “Antidiscrimination Law and the Perils of Mind-Reading,”Ohio State Law Journal, 67, 1023–1121.
43.
NosekBrian A., and BanajiMahzarin R., (2001), “The Go/No-Go Association Task,”Social Cognition, 19(6), 625–66.
44.
NosekBrian A., GreenwaldAnthony G., and BanajiMahzarin R., (2005), “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity,”Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–80.
45.
OlsonMichael A., and FazioRussell H., (2003), “Relations Between Implicit Measures of Prejudice: What Are We Measuring?”Psychological Science, 14(6), 636–39.
OttawayScott A., HaydenDavis C., and OakesMark A., (2001), “Implicit Attitudes and Racism: Effects of Word Familiarity and Frequency on the Implicit Association Test,”Social Cognition. Special Issue, 19(2), 97–144.
48.
PeracchioLaura A., and LunaDavid, (2006), “The Role of Thin-Slice Judgments in Consumer Psychology,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 25–32.
49.
PerkinsAndrew, ForehandMark R., GreenwaldAnthony G., and MaisonDominika, (2007), “Measuring the Non-Conscious: Implicit Social Cognition on Consumer Behavior,” in Handbook of Consumer Psychology, HaugtvedtCurtis P., HerrPaul, and KardesFrank R., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 461–75.
50.
PocheptsovaAnastasiya, AmirOn, DharRavi, and BaumeisterRoy F., (2009), “Deciding Without Resources: Resource Depletion and Choice in Context,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46(June), 344–55.
51.
RaghunathanRajagopal, NaylorRebecca Walker, and HoyerWayne D., (2006), “The Unhealthy Equal Tasty Intuition and Its Effects on Taste Inferences, Enjoyment, and Choice of Food Products,”Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 170–84.
52.
RothermundKlaus, and WenturaDirk, (2004), “Underlying Processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating Salience from Associations,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 139–65.
53.
SheltonJ. Nicole, RichesonJennifer A., SalvatoreJessica, and TrawalterSophie, (2005), “Ironic Effects of Racial Bias During Interracial Interactions,”Psychological Science, 16(5), 397–402.
54.
SteffensMelanie C., and PleweInga, (2001), “Items’ Cross-Category Associations as a Confounding Factor in the Implicit Association Test,”Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 123–34.
55.
StüttgenPeter, VosgerauJoachim, BoatwrightPeter, and MessnerClaude, (2009), “Adding Significance to the Implicit Association Test,” working paper, David A. Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University.
56.
TeachmanBethany A., WilsonJoel G., and KomarovskayaIrina, (2006), “Implicit and Explicit Stigma of Mental Illness in Diagnosed and Healthy Samples,”Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 75–95.
57.
Walker NaylorRebecca, RaghunathanRajagopal, and RamanathanSuresh, (2006), “Promotions Spontaneously Induce a Positive Evaluative Response,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 295–305.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
