Consumers desire products that provide meaningful experiences. Therefore, a marketer's success often depends on familiarizing consumers with the unique experience a product offers. Marketers recognize the value in communicating about a product experience through analogy, but little research has investigated if and why these analogies are persuasive. By comparing a product to a familiar but disparate experience, an analogy has the power to focus consumers on the evaluative, emotional, and multisensory information associated with the product experience. This focus on subjective product experience enables the identification of base preference (i.e., a consumer's liking for the comparison experience) as an important moderator of analogical persuasiveness. In addition, the emotional knowledge transfer perspective applied in this research contributes to a better understanding of the role of emotional knowledge and experienced emotion in analogical thinking.
AndersonStephen J., and ConwayMartin A., (1993), “Investigating the Structure of Autobiographical Memories,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1178–96.
2.
BowdleBrian F., and GentnerDedre, (2005), “The Career of Metaphor,”Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216.
3.
CohenJacob, CohenPatricia, WestStephen G., and AikenLeona S., (2003), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3d ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
ComblainChristine, D'ArgembeauArnaud, and Van der LindenMartial, (2005), “Phenomenal Characteristics of Autobiographical Memories for Emotional and Neutral Events in Older and Younger Adults,”Experimental Aging Research, 31(2), 173–89.
5.
GentnerDedre, (1989), “The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning,” in Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, VosniadouStella, and OrtonyAndrew, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 210–202.
6.
GentnerDedre, BowdleBrian F., WolffPhillip, and BoronatConsuelo, (2001), “Metaphor Is Like Analogy,” in The Analogical Mind, Dedre GentnerKeith, HolyoakJ., and KokinovBoicho N., eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 199–253.
7.
GentnerDedre, and MarkmanArthur B., (1997), “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity,”American Psychologist, 52(1), 45–56.
8.
GentnerDedre, RattermannMary Jo, and ForbusKenneth, (1993), “The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability from Inferential Soundness,”Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 524–75.
9.
GornGerald J., GoldbergMarvin E., and BasuKunal, (1993), “Mood, Awareness, and Product Evaluation,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 237–56.
10.
Gregan-PaxtonJennifer, HibbardJonathan D., BrunelFrederic, and AzarP., (2002), “‘So That's What That Is’: Examining the Impact of Analogy on Consumers’ Knowledge Development for Really New Products,”Psychology and Marketing, 19(6), 533–50.
11.
Gregan-PaxtonJennifer, and JohnDeborah Roedder, (1997), “Consumer Learning by Analogy: A Model of Internal Knowledge Transfer,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24(December), 266–84.
12.
Gregan-PaxtonJennifer, and Page MoreauC., (2003), “How Do Consumers Transfer Existing Knowledge? A Comparison of Analogy and Categorization Effects,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 422–30.
13.
HavlenaWilliam J., and HolbrookMorris B., (1986), “The Varieties of Consumption Experience: Comparing Two Typologies of Emotion in Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(December), 394–404.
14.
HirschmanElizabeth C., and HolbrookMorris B., (1985), “Expanding the Ontology and Methodology of Research on the Consumption Experience,” in Philosophies and Methods for Research on Experiential Consumer Behaviour, BrinbergDavid, and LutzRichard, eds. New York: Springer-Verlag, 213–51.
15.
HoefflerSteve, (2003), “Measuring Preferences for Really New Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 40(November), 406–420.
16.
HolbrookMorris B., and HirschmanElizabeth C., (1982), “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings and Fun,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9(September), 132–40.
17.
KeinanAnat, and KivetzRan, (2008), “Productivity Mindset and the Consumption of Collectable Experiences,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 35, LeeAngela, and SomanDilip, eds. Memphis, TN: Association for Consumer Research, 103.
18.
KuboseTate T., HolyoakKeith J., and HummelJohn E., (2002), “The Role of Textual Coherence in Incremental Analogical Mapping,”Journal of Memory and Language, 47(3), 407–435.
19.
LofmanBrian, (1991), “Elements of Experiential Consumption: An Exploratory Study,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 18, HolmanRebecca H., and SolomonMichael R., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 729–35.
20.
MarkmanArthur B., and GentnerDedre, (1993), “Structural Alignment During Similarity Comparisons,”Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 431–67.
21.
McQuarrieEdward F., and MickDavid G., (1996), “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–39.
22.
McQuarrieEdward F., and MickDavid G., (1999), “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, Reader-Response Analyses,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 37–54.
23.
MoreauC. Page, MarkmanArthur B., and LehmannDonald R., (2001), “‘What Is It?’ Categorization Flexibility and Consumers’ Responses to Really New Products,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27(March), 489–98.
24.
PerrottDavid A., GentnerDedre, and BodenhausenGalen V., (2005), “Resistance Is Futile: The Unwitting Insertion of Analogical Inferences in Memory,”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 696–702.
25.
PhamMichel Tuan, (1998), “Representativeness, Relevance, and Use of Feelings in Decision-Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 144–59.
26.
PineJoseph B., and GilmoreJames H., (1998), “Welcome to the Experience Economy,”Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 97–105.
27.
PreacherKristopher J., CurranPatrick J., and BauerDaniel. J., (2006), “Computational Tools for Probing Interaction Effects in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis,”Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–48.
28.
RichinsMarsha, (1997), “Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24(September), 127–46.
29.
RoehmMichelle L., and SternthalBrian, (2001), “The Moderating Effect of Knowledge and Resources on the Persuasive Impact of Analogies,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(September), 257–72.
30.
RuthJulie, A., (2001), “Promoting a Brand's Emotion Benefits: The Influence of Emotion Categorization Processes on Consumer Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 99–113.
31.
SaloveyPeter, BedellBrian T., DetweilerJerusha B., and MayerJohn D., (2000), “Current Directions in Emotional Intelligence Research,” in Handbook of Emotions, Vol. 2, LewisMichael, and Haviland-JonesJeannette, eds. New York: Guilford Press, 543–47.
32.
ShaverPhillip, SchwartzJudith, KirsonDonald, and O'ConnorCary, (1987), “Emotion Knowledge: Further Exploration of a Prototype Approach,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1061–1086.
33.
ShivBaba, and FedorikhinAlexander, (2002), “Spontaneous Versus Controlled Influences of Stimulus-Based Affect on Choice Behavior,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision-Making Processes, 87(March), 342–70.
34.
ThagardPaul, and ShelleyCameron, (2001), “Emotional Analogies and Analogical Inference,” in The Analogical Mind, Dedre GentnerKeith, HolyoakJ., and KokinovBoicho N., eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 335–62.
35.
WatsonDavid, ClarkLee A., and TellegenAuke, (1988), “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
36.
WestStephen G., AikenLeona S., and KrullJennifer L., (1996), “Experimental Personality Designs: Analyzing Categorical by Continuous Variable Interactions,”Journal of Personality, 64(1), 1–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
